What's new

US has been exposed for funding last year’s Hong Kong protests

Nan Yang

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
5,269
Reaction score
1
Country
Malaysia
Location
Malaysia
US has been exposed for funding last year’s Hong Kong protests
  • The little-known but powerful US Agency for Global Media has financed protesters in the city and helped them with technical support

Alex Lo

Published: 1:14am, 2 Jul, 2020

Imagine how the American government would react if multiple Chinese state agencies such as Xinhua were exposed secretly helping protest groups across the United States to evade surveillance and crackdowns by law enforcement agencies.

Washington would probably threaten China with war. Roughly, though, the little-known but powerful US Agency for Global Media has been doing just that in Hong Kong. It oversees funding for various news and information operations around the world, including Voice of America and Radio Free Asia.

About US$2 million was earmarked for the protest movement in Hong Kong, but has now been frozen as part of a general overhaul and restructuring by a new agency boss. An ally of President Donald Trump, CEO Michael Pack didn’t specifically target the Hong Kong funding, which was apparently caught up in his management overhaul.

The restructuring, though, has inadvertently exposed the US funding long denied by local protesters and pan-democrats.

bdc147ca-bbbc-11ea-b64b-070a892763db_1320x770_014436.jpg

Protesters at a December 2019 rally in Hong Kong appealed to US President Donald Trump for help. Photo: AP

According to Time magazine, the held-up funds were to have been distributed by the Washington-based Open Technology Fund (OTF), supposedly an independent non-profit, but financed by the US Congress. One cancelled project was to set up “a cybersecurity incident response team” to provide protesters with “secure communications apps” after analysing “Chinese surveillance techniques”.

According to Time, OTF “was a key early funder of Signal, the encrypted messaging app of choice for many Hong Kong protesters. Between 2012 and 2016, it donated nearly US$3 million to the development of the encryption protocol the app is built on”.

Another suspended project was “a rapid response fund”, which “has made several payouts to groups in Hong Kong since unrest began” in June last year. “The freeze,” reported Time, “has so far prevented at least one Hong Kong-related payout from the rapid response fund.”

Libby Liu, the former CEO of OTF who resigned over the funding freeze, acknowledged the operations. “We have several projects housed in Hong Kong,” Liu told Time. “We can’t help [people in Hong Kong] get ready if we can’t be in business.”

The agency and OTF are not the only ones. The National Endowment for Democracy, another Congress-funded entity, spent US$643,000 in Hong Kong last year. In 2013, according to its own records, it was US$695,031. Those amounts seem roughly to be recurrent annual spending in the city, at least until December when Beijing imposed sanctions against it.

They are probably just the tip of the iceberg.
 
Last edited:
. . . . . .
Here's a little tidbit from my neck of the woods in the US.

We have ongoing BLM protests and there have been clashes between protesters and law enforcement, with videos showing that police instigated peaceful protesters by resorting to tear gas and pellet guns without provocation in the early days of the protests. Local media, however, has been primarily reporting out the official narrative of the police department, despite citizen videos in several cases showing the police department to be outright lying.

Several people have called out local channels for promoting a one-sided view of the issue, something that is extremely troubling because police is one of the parties to the conflict and accused of excesses. At the least you would expect the local media to offer a caveat that they are trying to get the point of view of the protesters. Instead, the local media in a statement said that it was the responsibility of the protesters and others with video or other recordings to provide that information to the TV stations in order for them to provide their view.

My point here is, how is the behavior of this particular section of the US media (not necessarily all media nationally), where they are essentially providing the 'State supported narrative' any different from the same behavior Chinese media is criticized for, that is, providing only 'State authorized narratives'?
 
.
Just seeing the protesters on the street...

They are all well organized and funded.

No need to be smart to know this.


Black is Matter protest is more true and honest about what is the real protest looks like.

Rather than the HK protest BS.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom