What's new

US giant Walmart quits India after venture ends

For all the retailers in the world they have to give a lot of respect to this indian culture which tops the world for the 5th time in a row:

India tops retail theft study for fifth year in a row


link

I cant find the latest report but the trend shows the cheerleaders should be on the way to their 6th crown. It is indeed a shining regime on top of their other culture which hits the headlines across the world consistenly nowadays.

india - EXPOSED! Block XX!

In India loss prevention is not at par with other countries because the processes that are employed in the west is only now being studied and implemented by some big retailers. Using surveillance cameras is becoming more prevalent in stores. Retailers rely more on employees to oversee their customers which is not always very efficient because they can be easily distracted. In years to come this will change when some of the best practices that are practiced in the west for loss prevention are implemented here widely.
 
.
In India loss prevention is not at par with other countries because the processes that are employed in the west is only now being studied and implemented by some big retailers. Using surveillance cameras is becoming more prevalent in stores. Retailers rely more on employees to oversee their customers which is not always very efficient because they can be easily distracted. In years to come this will change when some of the best practices that are practiced in the west for loss prevention are implemented here widely.

In years to come ..

a natioal slogan of the cheerleading country!
 
. .
along the same vein here is another report:

Buffett's Berkshire shuts insurance broking biz in India
PTI New Delhi Last Updated: July 18, 2013 | 00:41 IST

At a time when Posco and Arcelor Mittal have shelved their mega steel projects in India, another global player, US billionaire Warren Buffett-led investment firm Berkshire Hathaway Inc has decided to close its online insurance broking business in the country.
 
. .
Wal-Mart's India departure, a sign of things to come?


Wal-Mart's decision this week to end a six-year joint venture with Indian conglomerate Bharti Enterprises is a blow to the government's drive to attract foreign investment and could force other global retailers to re-think their expansion plans into the country, analysts say.
As the world's largest retailer, Wal-Mart's foray into India's $500 billion retail segment has been closely watched by other global players looking to crack the promising yet challenging market.

The companies, which jointly operate 20 wholesale stores, sought to open full retail outlets in the country but ultimately decided to relinquish that plan. Wal-Mart will buy out Bharti's 50 percent stake in the venture.

(Read more: Wal-Mart to go solo in India, calls off JV with Bharti)
"The Indian government has acquired a very poor reputation among global multinationals for creating considerable uncertainty regarding the approval processes and also the taxation framework for FDI [foreign direct investment] into India," said Rajiv Biswas, senior director and Asia chief economist at IHS.

"We are seeing a retreat by foreign multinationals from their investment plans in India," he added, citing South Korean steelmaker Posco's decision in July to scrap a proposed steel project in the India state of Karnataka due to long approval delays.

Following Wal-Mart's announcement, Tesco—Britain's biggest grocer—told CNBC TV-18 on Thursday that it is awaiting further policy clarity before making a decision regarding investing in the country.

While the Indian government has taken several steps to ease foreign investment rules in the past year and a half—such as allowing foreign supermarket chains to enter the country and own up to 51 percent in their local operations—there are many strings attached to its policies.

(Read more: Raghuram Rajan: India's deficit is under control)
For example, it's mandatory for companies to bring in at least $100 million worth of investment, split between the front and back end, and source at least 30 percent of their products from local companies. This creates problems for multinational firms that have global quality standards to adhere to.

Arvind Singhal, chairman of consultancy firm Technopak Advisors says foreign players' limited interest in investing in India isn't a surprise given the government's restrictive policies.

"It's not about the lack of desire to invest; it's the practicality of implementing investment plans with government conditions. For example, if you're a Walgreens or Foot Locker, you don't need to put that kind of investment into the back end. This condition is onerous," he said. "Hopefully, this will put pressure on the government to relook at its policies."

Singhal, however, sees Wal-Mart's decision to continue its wholesale venture in the country despite its challenges as a positive signal. India allows full foreign ownership in cash-and-carry or wholesale operations.

"Macro indicators of the world are such that India does offer some kind of promise. Frustration is there, but the opportunity is still attractive enough," he said.
(Read more: India urged to allow greater foreign access to bond markets)
Despite the allure of some 1.2 billion consumers and growth levels that are superior to that of developed nations, many India watchers say it will take some time before the country sees a pickup in FDI, particularly with the uncertainty of the 2014 general elections looming.

"The nearer we get to the election, the more likelihood any investment plans will be on the back burner," said Radhika Rao, economist at DBS.

Three key reforms are urgently needed, Biswas said, noting that tax law for foreign investment should be rewritten to remove uncertainty regarding taxation of FDI, the approval process needs to be streamlined, and the restrictions on key sectors like retail should to be changed to make the regulations workable for foreign firms.
"Unfortunately the current Indian government seems to be in a state of denial about the need for such far-reaching reforms," he said.

Has Wal-Mart killed India
 
. . .
Good for Walmart. Doing retail in the land of shoplifting thieves is not going to be easy.

Good for India too.

BTW Walmart has a history of beating chinese shoplifters to death :cheesy: ....... do you shop at walmart too ? Go live your american dream, just make sure they don't recognize you as chinese at walmat.

Wal-Mart thugs beat Chinese shoplifter to death | National Union of Public and General Employees

A woman in China's eastern Jiangxi province was beaten to death by five Wal-Mart employees who accused her of shoplifting, says a police report as well as a report on state media. Police say two of the workers have been arrested and the other three are being investigated.

According to police, the woman was beaten Aug. 30 outside her home, which is located close to the Wal-Mart outlet. She died of her injuries four days later.
 
.
yawn, come back to the thread when you find any major accomplishment of Huawei in US. I'm sure a high IQ would not have trouble finding it, if it exists.

I said the world, not US. Look, playing dumb ain't going to work here. This is not India, I'm not Indian. :laughcry:

Come back when you can back up what you said.
 
.
And besides the Walmart and others detesting of operations in india, here is more:



India and Nokia in Tax Dispute Before Microsoft Deal

Other Western companies have faced tax issues in India. Vodafone, the British telecommunications company, is fighting efforts by the Indian authorities to require it to pay as much as $3 billion related to its acquisition of a majority stake in a local cellphone operator in 2007.

General Electric, Royal Dutch Shell and others companies have had similar disputes with Indian tax officials.


why don't you shuttle away if you have nothing to contribute?? :pissed:

I am telling the dire mentality of the cheerleaders. the days of hiding dirts under the rugs are getting shorter

It was not only the matters of "all indian future tenses" that matters. Look around you: Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Bhutan, Nepal, Maldives ..are not doing those crimes which will impact on a companies profits. I am should companies like Walmart and other retail stores will budget in the factor of "loss on shoptheft" while operating in india
 
.
And besides the Walmart and others detesting of operations in india, here is more:

I am telling the dire mentality of the cheerleaders. the days of hiding dirts under the rugs are getting shorter

It was not only the matters of "all indian future tenses" that matters. Look around you: Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Bhutan, Nepal, Maldives ..are not doing those crimes which will impact on a companies profits. I am should companies like Walmart and other retail stores will budget in the factor of "loss on shoptheft" while operating in india

Please come to the point if you have one. Just ranting for sake of ranting will not get you brownie points.

I am trying to understand your ranting but your English is so bad I am having difficulty to comprehend you.

Every market has its pluses and minuses. In some countries like in Pakistan which has most liberal business climate but having difficulty attracting FDI because of their security issues. Regarding other countries you have mentioned they are smaller markets except for Bangladesh which has sizable population but their middle class buying power is limited. In case of India we have sizable middle class but our business climate is not conducive for multi brand retail like Walmart. It is because of our protectionist policies. We do not want our mom and pop stores to suffer unnecessarily. Also because we are a democracy our politicians are cautiously treading into unknown territories and do not want to lose their vote bank.
 
.
Indians are very anti-business people. I believe it's part of their corrupt and indisciplined culture. That's why the west chose us instead of India to do business. India is a 3rd world country and dirt corrupt, businessmen don't like that.
 
.
Indians are very anti-business people. I believe it's part of their corrupt and indisciplined culture. That's why the west chose us instead of India to do business. India is a 3rd world country and dirt corrupt, businessmen don't like that.

Chinaman complaining about Indian corruption is kind of like the pot calling the kettle black.

Corruption Perceptions Index 2012 from Transparency International - YouTube

China is 80th India 84.

Russia is pretty bad. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/business/global/24ruble.html?_r=0
 
.
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom