'US didn't see any reason for India to have 5,500-km range missiles'

[punit]

Pakistan should invite Indian soldiers to cross the border to get some food. Indian soldiers are human beings as well and someone need to treat them as humans.

seems new jokes are in short supply at CPC !

 

[RealNapster]

Use as many excuses as you can but it still means hiding failures.

OK. so ?

 

[Riz]

That was a US missile. lol

Country of origin.. Pakistan and USA, it means Co developed by pak & USA

 

[Gregor Clegane]

When you have lost an argument, just fiddle about with words to hide your sorry backside.

Good to see you talking about yourself.

We tested sounding rocket in 1962, now u Google when India teated its first sounding rocket?

That was not your sounding rocket it was NASA's.

Country of origin.. Pakistan and USA, it means Co developed by pak & USA

Not a single Pakistani input in whole rocket.

 

[Riz]

No country can hie missile tests, everyone have to declare NAVAREA. Pakistan is the only country in the world which never had a test failure. Even alien technologies fails! Not Pakistani!

India is the only country which claimes there everything is superior even before it develops, billions of fekus rejoicing themselves comparing there Nirbhy missile (which failed to fly even a one meter) with a well matured 12 years old Babur missile, for themTeja is there 5g stealth fighter which is rejected even by there own airforce

 

[schoolboy]

The report is relevant even today. Except China I see no other security concern and it's pointless to waste money on longer range missiles. Far better that the existing missiles be tested sufficiently to iron out bugs, deployment proceed well, an effective C&C system be set up and proper training imparted to those in charge of these missiles.

 

[Great Sachin]

I am sure..US wont mind if India test fire 10K missile also

 

[Pseudonym]

. Even alien technologies fails!

Did goswami tell you that or jee newj?

 

[jaydee]

Its not just HATF but Ghauri too:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/01/28/asia-pacific/norths-missiles-tied-to-musharraf-blunder/

All these incidents show Pakistan covers up its failed missile tests.

It doesn't say failed missile test.It only says that Hatf lacked guidance system in 90's and if you are in slumber since 90's then someone needs to wake you up.Pakistani missile program has surpassed Indian missile program in its complexity now.

 

[kṣamā]

It doesn't say failed missile test.It only says that Hatf lacked guidance system in 90's and if you are in slumber since 90's then someone needs to wake you up.Pakistani missile program has surpassed Indian missile program in its complexity now.

Ok come on you guys need to teach us how you guys deduce that "MIRV CAPABLE" in ISPR press release means "We are world leader in MIRV tech, India's BMD neutralized" but a Nuclear capable missile without sound guidance doesn't mean Failure.

 

[Ram Mahadev]

US should prepare herself for Agni-6. 8000+ KM SLBM. Full composite stages, thrust vectoring, MARV.

That could be for 2T playload what about 750 kg playload with 3 250 kg MIRV s??? Chinese are nervous for a reason . Agni 6 and probably Agni 7 which could be known as Agni 5C will literally cripple Chinese BMD systems.

India can't waste time in these bitching. Our Aim will be to fine tune Agni 5 , Upgraded Agni 3 , MIRV Agni 6 , K 4 fine tuning ,K5 which is Naval variant of Agni 6 in respect to Range 5000 km out of no where from the depths of the ocean 500kg * 4 independent warheads .

All are Chinese specific . Arihant class subs with 6-8 K5 will send any country to the Stone age of required. Now thats we called Check Mate.

Pakistan can't get all the advanced technology from China. As Chinese will be caught for selling technologies which cannot be developed in Short terms by Pakistan. That's why they started selling MIRV and only God know if they also sold some hydrogen bombs secretly . One thing is sure . I never seen China pissing it's pants like they do with India. India is just nextdoor. Not some 10,000, km away . And a Huge land Mass with huge population with robust global support

 

[Gregor Clegane]

It doesn't say failed missile test.It only says that Hatf lacked guidance system in 90's and if you are in slumber since 90's then someone needs to wake you up.Pakistani missile program has surpassed Indian missile program in its complexity now.

Not at all
Pakistani ballistic missiles still use stabilising fins like 50s era Scuds.
None of Pakistan's ballistic missiles like S-3/Ababeel are even canisterised.

 

[DesiWarrior]

Not at all
Pakistani ballistic missiles still use stabilising fins like 50s era Scuds.
None of Pakistan's ballistic missiles like S-3/Ababeel are even canisterised.

Why all our missiles need to be canisterised? Just to show you that we can do it? Our experts know the operational requirements for each missile and our R&D works building capabilities towards that end.

By the way, have you ever seen Nasr and Babur's launch videos? Please tell me how they are launched? Do some research before churning out your expert opinion.

I am sure you'll have a very high opinion of your Prithvi missile; why is it not canisterised?

 

[Gregor Clegane]

Why all our missiles need to be canisterised? Just to show you that we can do it? Our experts know what's operational requirement for each missile and our R&D works building capabilities towards that end.

By the way, how you ever seen Nasr and Babur's launch videos? Please tell me how they are launched? Do some research before churning out your expert opinion.

I am sure you'll have a very high opinion of your Prithvi missile; why is it not canisterised?

Canisterisation significantly improves life of a ballistic missiles and more reliable.nasr is more of an artillery rocket and Babur is a cruise missile.
Prithvi was developed in 90s where as S-3/Abl were developed recently just like A-5.

Why on a thread that is about Indian missiles range are you spewing venom about Pakistan? Feeling insecure about something? When you are lacking in something, it's better to just stay quiet.

Just paying Windjammer in same coin.

 

[DesiWarrior]

Canisterisation significantly improves life of a ballistic missiles and more reliable.nasr is more of an artillery rocket and Babur is a cruise missile.
Prithvi was developed in 90s where as S-3/Abl were developed recently just like A-5.


Just paying Windjammer in same coin.

There are recent versions of Prithvi that were tested in the last couple of years, so they could have been canisterised. My point here is not all missiles need to be canisterised; it's the the way those missiles are going to be deployed that warrant such capability.