What's new

'US didn't see any reason for India to have 5,500-km range missiles'

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
The US always felt India had no reason to pursue a missile programme with a range beyond 5,500 km because it would be enough to target China and anything more than that would be useless, according to a declassified 1990 CIA document.

The US assessment is borne out by India not yet deciding to go ahead with a missile beyond 5,000-km range of Agni V that was test fired recently even as reports suggest that a version of Agni V with Multiple Independently Targetable Re-entry Warheads (MIRV) is being developed.

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in the partially declassified top secret intelligence assessment dated June 1, 1990, on the "Ballistic Missiles in India and Pakistan" said: "We see little benefit to India of developing ICBM-class (more than 5,500 km range) missile. A missile with considerable less range would be able to strike any target in China."

Any Indian ballistic missile with beyond 6,000 km range would be able to reach parts of Europe -- a target India never considered in its strategic defence programmes.

Most of the report has not been declassified.

Talking about Pakistan's ballistic missiles, the report says: "Both Hatf (I-II) are flawed by the lack of a guidance system and, hence, have very poor accuracy... Pakistan is attempting to obtain Scud missiles technology from North Korea and is developing LD - a probably longer range system."

"Pakistani officials have also been in contact with representatives of the European consortium that supervised the development of the 750-1,000 km range Condor II in Argentina. Production of the Condor II or another missile with a range longer than the Hatf II is likely in Pakistan by the mid-to-late 1990s."

The report clearly shows the US did not make any serious effort in restricting Pakistan from violating the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR). Pakistan went on to develop Shaheen III with range beyond 2,500 km.

India, on June 27, 2016, became 35th full member of the MTCR -- an informal and voluntary partnership among 35 countries, which prevent proliferation of missile technology over more than 300 km.


http://www.business-standard.com/ar...e-5-500-km-range-missiles-117013001173_1.html
 
. .
If we can then why not!
Agni 6 will clear up their rest of confusion
 
.
Talking about Pakistan's ballistic missiles, the report says: "Both Hatf (I-II) are flawed by the lack of a guidance system and, hence, have very poor accuracy... Pakistan is attempting to obtain Scud missiles technology from North Korea and is developing LD - a probably longer range system."

"Pakistani officials have also been in contact with representatives of the European consortium that supervised the development of the 750-1,000 km range Condor II in Argentina. Production of the Condor II or another missile with a range longer than the Hatf II is likely in Pakistan by the mid-to-late 1990s."
More proof that Pakistan covers up it's missile Failures.
 
.
Go go India, keep testing long range missiles so that we can also test our Icbm too
 
.
More proof that Pakistan covers up it's missile Failures.

bhai it's a well known fact. nothing new. also to remind you this report is from 1990s. by that time Hatf 1-2 were indeed without a credible guidance system. but these problems have been solved in Hatf-1A and Hatf-1B which came inline in 1995 and 2001 respectively .

Now go back and again start search of "more proof's" ...
 
. . . . .
Its not just HATF but Ghauri too:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/01/28/asia-pacific/norths-missiles-tied-to-musharraf-blunder/

All these incidents show Pakistan covers up its failed missile tests.


Really ? A news quoting an incident from 1999 ? You can do better then this. Please try hard.

According to the Pakistani military reports, the original design of the missile was flawed and the missile's frontal conic nose section material burned up due to generated shock waves and hypersonic effect on re-entry during its first test flight in 1998.[12] High stress and high temperature shift caused the material to melt during the re-entry while its vintage electronic systems, engine system, and propellant had to be replaced.[12] Eventually, the conic nose section was redesigned by rounding the cone which allowed the missile to travel from subsonic flow to supersonic flow.[12] The KRL, with assistance from the NESCOM, DESTO, and NDC, engaged in heavy reengineering of much of the missile electronic system
 
.
Really ? A news quoting an incident from 1999 ? You can do better then this. Please try hard.

According to the Pakistani military reports, the original design of the missile was flawed and the missile's frontal conic nose section material burned up due to generated shock waves and hypersonic effect on re-entry during its first test flight in 1998.[12] High stress and high temperature shift caused the material to melt during the re-entry while its vintage electronic systems, engine system, and propellant had to be replaced.[12] Eventually, the conic nose section was redesigned by rounding the cone which allowed the missile to travel from subsonic flow to supersonic flow.[12] The KRL, with assistance from the NESCOM, DESTO, and NDC, engaged in heavy reengineering of much of the missile electronic system
Thecfact that Pakistan did not publicize this failures then is proof that Pakistan hides missile Failures.
 
.
Its not just HATF but Ghauri too:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/01/28/asia-pacific/norths-missiles-tied-to-musharraf-blunder/

All these incidents show Pakistan covers up its failed missile tests.
Yea yea India invented the wheel, ,,, your Pakistan obsession is driving you insane, now when your excitement wears down then talk to yourself and ask even if the anonymous source is to be believed, when did Kargil happen.....almost 20 years earlier, it may have had some CEP issues but unlike some Indian missiles, it didn't head for Mars.
 
. .
Yea yea India invented the wheel, ,,, your Pakistan obsession is driving you insane, now when your excitement wears down then talk to yourself and ask even if the anonymous source is to be believed, when did Kargil happen.....almost 20 years earlier, it may have had some CEP issues but unlike some Indian missiles, it didn't head for Mars.
Look who is talking about Mars.
Your country should first launch a 50 kg satellite first.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom