vishwambhar
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2020
- Messages
- 2,094
- Reaction score
- -19
- Country
- Location
Chinese DF41 is no match to USA MINUTEMAN....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
spoke like a true loyal house slave subservient to everything his master has!Chinese DF41 is no match to USA MINUTEMAN....
I hope you do know that both of these wont go head to head and slug it out in a fist fight, both of these are developed for different roles with different ideologies of war in mind.Chinese DF41 is no match to USA MINUTEMAN....
1) you might not but millions dono body considers him as a prophet, even the average budhist doesn't consider him as anything but a politician & at most, representative of Bubudhism, nothing more.
2. alternative? lol...look at China.. you can't deny the fact that their system works & works very effectively.
why ask them when you can see for yourself...even China's arch rivals admit that they have indeed created a system that works. in contrast, when one takes a look at dismal state india is in which is the biggest democracy in the world, the case against democracy becomes that much stronger. and there is no concept of a prophet in buddhism.1) you might not but millions do
2) you can show the effectiveness of Chinese system by asking any Chinese living in China post the picture in my DP.you will get your answer
B-1 Lancer readiness is in the toilet, here’s why
Only 6 of 61 US Air Force B-1B Strategic Bombers Are Fully Combat-Ready
B1B sucks, even US air force dislike it. B1B is not supersonic, nor stealthy. Variable-sweep wing is an outdated design, not reliable, maintenance is very expensive.
US would rather go with grandpa era B-52 instead of junk B1B. or maybe B21 which need at least more than a decade to start produce.
It's very outdated design and tactic. Low latitude penetration is suicidal when AWACS are widely adopted.
B1B is expensive, less efficient, high maintenance, low readiness.
B1B is a burden, not a asset.
USAF will get rid of those crap soon.
the entire bomber fleet is actually a white elephant at this point. suited only for attacking unarmed enemies that can't hit back.
As much as they hate the B-1, it is their only bomber capable of standoff operations using their latest anti-shipping missile LRASM right now. Their F-18s are still armed with Harpoons, while their B-52s have absolutely zero chance of successfully getting within LRASM launch range and surviving. Their B-2s also can't carry the LRASM.
2 Long-Range Anti-Ship Missiles Test Fired From B-1B Successfully Hit Moving Ship
U.S. defense firm Lockheed Martin successfully hit a moving ship with two long-range anti-ship missiles during a recent test.thediplomat.com
Readiness declines in aging, overworked fleet
The repercussions of budget cuts, aging and long service in Iraq and Afghanistan are reflected in the most recent mission-capable rates of the Air Force fleet: grounded trainers and the important B-2A Spirit least ready for flight of all.www.militarytimes.com
the B-2 being subsonic and stealthy trades off alot of capability in terms of standoff weapons mounting while the B-52 is a gas guzzling piece of shit that is basically only still in use because it is good at bombing the defenseless and they already paid for it.
every single one of these american aircrafts can be really shot down with HQ9 SAM missiles with the exception of "maybe" the f35 and even that's doubtful. being far away from home in front of an enemy that is playing on home turf has some severe disadvantages.
B-1 Lancer readiness is in the toilet, here’s why
Only 6 of 61 US Air Force B-1B Strategic Bombers Are Fully Combat-Ready
B1B sucks, even US air force dislike it. B1B is not supersonic, nor stealthy. Variable-sweep wing is an outdated design, not reliable, maintenance is very expensive.
US would rather go with grandpa era B-52 instead of junk B1B. or maybe B21 which need at least more than a decade to start produce.
It's very outdated design and tactic. Low latitude penetration is suicidal when AWACS are widely adopted.
B1B is expensive, less efficient, high maintenance, low readiness.
B1B is a burden, not a asset.
USAF will get rid of those crap soon.
B1B sucks, even US air force dislike it. B1B is not supersonic, nor stealthy.
Chinese HQ9s and S400s have a ranges of 250 and 400 miles respectively. us bombers will have to launch missiles clear from far into a minimum of 450 mile out into international airspace in which case, it would provide the excuse for the massive retaliation China has been looking for...there's a reason why the u.s. just keeps quiet and hasn't fired a single bullet let alone a missile against either the PLA, PLAAF or the PLAN in decades past.US bombers can launch salvoes of missiles well outside the range of Chinese defenses and their capabilities will grow as ARRW and JASSM-XR are introduced. And F-35s have dominated SAM networks in Red Flag exercises.
Chinese HQ9s and S400s have a ranges of 250 and 400 miles respectively. us bombers will have to launch missiles clear from far into a minimum of 450 mile out into international airspace in which case, it would provide the excuse for the massive retaliation China has been looking for...there's a reason why the u.s. just keeps quiet and hasn't fired a single bullet let alone a missile against either the PLA, PLAAF or the PLAN in decades past.
usaf would be wise to save its flexing for nations like Iraq, Syria & Afghanistan...in spite of all the brouhaha you've barfed, usaf & usn didn't fair all too well against the russians over Syria. I wouldn't try my luck against a nation that can target your carriers in the middle of the pacific Ocean with pin point accuracy of I was you.The US Air Force has been simulating Russian S-300/400s for some time now at Red Flag and F-35s have dismantled them in exercises.
An unrefueled F-35a armed with JASSM-ER would be able to touch central China.
The Air Force will also begin receiving the 1,900 km JASSM-XR in about 3 years. The US can penetrate every part of China, even more so when B-21 enters service. Everyday the US is soaking up Chinese radar and data links and breaking apart Chinese kill chains.
usaf would be wise to save its flexing for nations like Iraq, Syria & Afghanistan...in spite of all the brouhaha you've barfed, usaf & usn didn't fair all too well against the russians over Syria. I wouldn't try my luck against a nation that can target your carriers in the middle of the pacific Ocean with pin point accuracy of I was you.
usaf would be wise to save its flexing for nations like Iraq, Syria & Afghanistan...in spite of all the brouhaha you've barfed, usaf & usn didn't fair all too well against the russians over Syria. I wouldn't try my luck against a nation that can target your carriers in the middle of the pacific Ocean with pin point accuracy of I was you.