What's new

US court asks India's Congress to answer charges on 1984 attacks on Sikhs

You know that he has been indicted by the SIT, right? Do you know what an indictment is?

We both are going way off topic we should take this to the Gujarat riot thread already on PDF however ill come back to you on your last comment:



The SIT report, accessed by CNN-IBN and Tehelka, does not give a clean chit to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi but says there is not enough evidence to prosecute him in the riots cases.

 
.
We both are going way off topic we should take this to the Gujarat riot thread already on PDF however ill come back to you on your last comment:



The SIT report, accessed by CNN-IBN and Tehelka, does not give a clean chit to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi but says there is not enough evidence to prosecute him in the riots cases.


Now you're lying again:

In a severe indictment of Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi for his alleged role in the 2002 post-Godhra massacre, the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) has held that he failed to control the riots in which more than 1200 people were killed. In its 600-page report, accessed by weekly Tehelka, the SIT has indicted Modi on several counts such as taking a partisan stance, discriminatory attitude, failing to condemn the violence, destruction of documents with evidentiary value and shunting out police officers who tried to prevent the riots.
The Supreme Court in April 2009 had asked the SIT headed by former CBI director RK Raghavan to investigate the complaint of Zakia Jafri into the murder of her husband Ehsan Jafri, a former Congress MP who was among the 69 people killed by rioters in Gulberg Society.

The SIT report, dated May 12, 2010, said Modi, despite attacks on Muslims, tried to water down the seriousness of the situation by saying that every action had an equal and opposite reaction. It said Modi’s implied justification of the killings suggested a partisan stance at a critical juncture when the state was badly disturbed by riots.

It also indicted the Gujarat police for “patently shoddy investigations in Naroda Patiya and Gulberg Society massacres cases”. Rioters killed more than 100 people in Naroda Patiya.

In an “extremely controversial” move, the report said Modi placed two ministers Ashok Bhatt and IK Jadeja — whose cellphone records showed they were in touch with rioters — in control rooms of Ahmedabad city police and Gujarat state police during riots with no definite charter, fuelling speculation that they were sent to interfere in police work and give “wrongful” decisions.
 
.
Now you're lying again:


I never lied once :disagree:


This is more a congress vs BJP battle being played out



Pointing out that the inferences of Special Investigation Team chief R.K. Raghavan did not match the findings of the SIT in the probe against Chief Minister Narendra Modi and 62 others in a 2002 Gujarat riots case, the Supreme Court on Tuesday asked it to examine the observations of the amicus curiae and consider conducting a further probe into the complaint by Zakia, wife of the slain former Congress MP, Ehsan Jaffrey.

Acting on the complaint, which alleged that Mr. Modi and 62 others orchestrated post-Godhra communal riots in 2002 in connivance with police officials and senior bureaucrats, the SIT conducted a probe and submitted its report to the court in May 2010. Thereafter, a Bench of Justices D.K. Jain, P. Sathasivam and Aftab Alam appointed senior advocate Raju Ramachandran amicus curiae to examine the SIT report.

During the resumed hearing on Tuesday, Justice Jain told Mr. Raghavan: “We can't brush aside the observations of the amicus curiae. You examine the observations, re-examine the entire evidence recorded and if some more evidence is required to be recorded you may do it.”

Justice Alam told Mr. Raghavan, “Your inferences [on the SIT report] do not match the findings.”



Why Congress who btw MP, Ehsan Jaffrey was a party member of wish to implicate Modi and BJP in Gujarat? it is not hard to see the politics being played out.


The Hindu : News / National : Your inferences don't match SIT report, court tells Raghavan
 
.
Now you're lying again:

BTW, i find it funny that you from Hoboken NJ, the home to the largest Hindu population. you must have ulcers every day :D. If I were you I would contact my senator ( that's if you are a citizen) from NJ and ask him to stop Modi from getting a US visa soon too..

can't promise they pay attention to the Pak community much - but worth a try. this way you can focus your energy in more channeled manner. don't forget to let them know how much you loveeeeee the US ;)
 
. . . .
.
BTW, i find it funny that you from Hoboken NJ, the home to the largest Hindu population. you must have ulcers every day :D. If I were you I would contact my senator ( that's if you are a citizen) from NJ and ask him to stop Modi from getting a US visa soon too..

can't promise they pay attention to the Pak community much - but worth a try. this way you can focus your energy in more channeled manner. don't forget to let them know how much you loveeeeee the US ;)

I think you don't know too much about Hoboken my friend. Here are the demographics of Hoboken, NJ:

White 31178 80.82%
Black or African American 1644 4.26%
American Indian and Alaska Native 60 0.16%
Asian 1661 4.31%
Asian indian 625 1.62%
Chinese 465 1.21%
Filipino 136 0.35%
Japanese 126 0.33%
Korean 182 0.47%
Vietnamese 27 0.07%
Other Asian 100 0.26%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 21 0.05%
Native Hawaiian 2 0.01%
Guamanian or Chamorro 10 0.03%
Samoan 2 0.01%
Other Pacific Islander 7 0.02%
Some other race 2942 7.63%
Two or more races

The total population of Hoboken is about 40,000.

(1.62 * 40,000)/100 = 648

Let's make it 700. Not even near the largest Hindu population in the country. You clearly don't know where Hoboken is, and I'm guessing you probably don't even live in the US.
 
.
Lolzzz. Tehelka -a Congress mouthpiece ,virulently anti-Hindu and Headlines Today, another Congress Lackey.

Very credible Sources. You could gave given Rupee News instead. They are both in the same stead.

What about Hindustan Times my friend? What about India Today? You clearly forgot to mention them.
 
.
What about Hindustan Times my friend? What about India Today? You clearly forgot to mention them.

They all get the story from the same 'leak' accessed by Tehelka. :wave:

And if you could have understood simple English the SIT reprimanded him not for 'conducting' the riots but for failing to 'stop' it within the three days.There is a huge difference between the two.

Anyway whatever I say it will not go into your mind which is already conditioned to think in a particular way.

And BTW stick to the topic about 1984 and dont be a typical Pakistani bringing in Gujarat in every thread.
 
. .
They all get the story from the same 'leak' accessed by Tehelka. :wave:

And if you could have understood simple English the SIT reprimanded him not for 'conducting' the riots but for failing to 'stop' it within the three days.There is a huge difference between the two.

Anyway whatever I say it will not go into your mind which is already conditioned to think in a particular way.

And BTW stick to the topic about 1984 and dont be a typical Pakistani bringing in Gujarat in every thread.

Here is EXACTLY what the SIT said (focus on ALL the bolded parts):

In a severe indictment of Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi for his alleged role in the 2002 post-Godhra massacre, the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) has held that he failed to control the riots in which more than 1200 people were killed. In its 600-page report, accessed by weekly Tehelka, the SIT has indicted Modi on several counts such as taking a partisan stance, discriminatory attitude, failing to condemn the violence, destruction of documents with evidentiary value and shunting out police officers who tried to prevent the riots.
The Supreme Court in April 2009 had asked the SIT headed by former CBI director RK Raghavan to investigate the complaint of Zakia Jafri into the murder of her husband Ehsan Jafri, a former Congress MP who was among the 69 people killed by rioters in Gulberg Society.

The SIT report, dated May 12, 2010, said Modi, despite attacks on Muslims, tried to water down the seriousness of the situation by saying that every action had an equal and opposite reaction. It said Modi’s implied justification of the killings suggested a partisan stance at a critical juncture when the state was badly disturbed by riots.

It also indicted the Gujarat police for “patently shoddy investigations in Naroda Patiya and Gulberg Society massacres cases”. Rioters killed more than 100 people in Naroda Patiya.

In an “extremely controversial” move, the report said Modi placed two ministers Ashok Bhatt and IK Jadeja — whose cellphone records showed they were in touch with rioters — in control rooms of Ahmedabad city police and Gujarat state police during riots with no definite charter, fuelling speculation that they were sent to interfere in police work and give “wrongful” decisions.

04_02_2011_011_003.jpg


Report indicts Modi on several accounts, including shunting out cops trying to stop riots, destruction of documents. :welcome:
 
.
So Indian sources that don't support your assertions aren't reliable anymore? You are one joke mister.

The joke is on you Mister.

quoting from zee news, such a reliable source of information :tup:

And we in India kow which is reliable and which is not. No need for a Pakistani to teach me. :wave:

BTW Stick to topic about 1984 and dont troll
 
.
Here is EXACTLY what the SIT said (focus on ALL the bolded parts):

As I said till the full SIT report is released, take your daily kicks reading the 'leaks' from Tehelka. Or better you can try Rupee news, its local cousin. :lol:

And third time - Stick to topic about 1984, Mr. Dont troll about Gujarat.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom