US Congress War Game on Taiwan, US failed to stop China, 80,000 People's Liberation Army landed in Taiwan, U.S. military sank 80 land ships

[beijingwalker]

It doesn’t need to outproduce China in ships. You realize the Soviets had quantitative superiority over the US right?

You are just all talk, the more you talk , the more balance will tilt in China's favor, time is not on your side.

 

[RoadAmerica]

Every one of these "wargames" seems to have China landing troops in a contested naval and air environment. Why?

Not a single ground troop would be mobilized until air and naval dominance would be achieved. Taiwan's defenses would have been bombed for weeks by that point.

Also love that fact that Americans don't mention their losses.

The did, might want to read again.

 

[F-22Raptor]

You are just all talk, the more you talk , the more balance will tilt in China's favor, time is not on your side.

View attachment 926107

I gave procurement documents, not talk. That’s real missiles and investment.

The US military will be FAR more advanced in the 2030s than today. You’re NEVER going to overmatch the US. Let it settle in

 

[Zsari]

It doesn’t need to outproduce China in ships. You realize the Soviets had quantitative superiority over the US right?

The Soviets never had more production capacity than the U.S. Not even close.

 

[beijingwalker]

I gave procurement documents, not talk. That’s real missiles and investment.

The US military will be FAR more advanced in the 2030s than today. You’re NEVER going to overmatch the US. Let it settle in

You are just all talk, with China's economy becomes bigger and bigger, Industrial lead wider and wider, you still try to paint a rosy picture for US future, but do you really believe it yourself?

 

[F-22Raptor]

The Soviets never had more production capacity than the U.S. Not even close.

The US developed AirLand and Assault Breaker battle doctrine specifically because the Soviets had quantitative superiority in Europe. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

 

[beijingwalker]

The US developed AirLand and Assault Breaker battle doctrine specifically because the Soviets had quantitative superiority in Europe. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

USSR never possessed the unrivaled industrial and manufacturing prowess that China is having now, it sacrificed its civil sector for military buildup, China is on the contrary, started from civil sector first and develops her military slowly but steadily. percentage of the military budget in Chinese overall economy is always very small.

Today' US is much like former USSR

 

[ObeseGunTotingMurican]

It's already over. If there's a war with China today, the US will get its teeth punched down its throat.

If I were the US, I wouldn't worry about China taking Taiwan, I'd worry about it taking Hawaii.

I seriously doubt this. We've got technology China is still way behind. The B-2 is 1980s technology and the H-20 still isn't a thing yet.

Conventionally, the US absolutely slams China. That said, we are not limitless in our warmongering and since China has nukes, we'll keep our distance atm.

 

[F-22Raptor]

USSR never possessed the unrivaled industrial and manufacturing prowess that China is having now, it sacrificed its civil sector for military buildup, China is on the contrary, started from civil sector first and develops her military slowly but steadily. percentage of the military budget in Chinese overall economy is always very small.

Today' US is much like former USSR

Nope, the US is nothing like the Soviets. We spend 3.2% of GDP on defense. We were spending 6.8% in the 80s.

The Soviets spent 20%+

 

[ObeseGunTotingMurican]

USSR never possessed the unrivaled industrial and manufacturing prowess that China is having now, it sacrificed its civil sector for military buildup, China is on the contrary, started from civil sector first and develops her military slowly but steadily. percentage of the military budget in Chinese overall economy is always very small.

Today' US is much like former USSR

Not really. If it's a manufacturing numbers game, the numbers are currently stacked in America's favor. Like most categories related to killing people (gun violence, heart disease) merica ranks first in most categories corresponding to military manufacturing. Their naval aviation component alone is bigger than the entire PLAAF, and the USMC's aviation department is bigger than Russia's VVS.

 

[beijingwalker]

Nope, the US is nothing like the Soviets. We spend 3.2% of GDP on defense. We were spending 6.8% in the 80s.

The Soviets spent 20%+

But still, comparing to China, US is more like Soviet Union, China never ever spends that much on military and never tries to secure global domination at any cost.

 

[Get Ya Wig Split]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1650502991844110338

 

[beijingwalker]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1650502991844110338

US abysmal track record tells us that America is always the one who initiates wars, not the one who ends them.

 

[Sam6536]

If there's an actual conflict over Taiwan then what about in South China Sea and Indian Ocean? How can China counter India in Indian Ocean and other nations in south china sea who move to protect their interests while at the same time fighting Taiwanese and Americans?
What if QUAD moves in at the same time with plans of its own?

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

The PLAN will be buried at the bottom of the sea, and the Chinese economy destroyed.

You so much as sniff around the FIC and China will delete your navy from existence. A decade or two more and anything that sails east of Hawaii lives by China's mercy.

Try something. If you feel froggy, jump.