US concerned on killings in Pakistan

[yyetttt]

2 rights don't make a wrong a right!!!

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Well you refused to do it in NW. Also if you did not liked it why you allowed them to setup drone operating centers and provide them info.

You guys are complaining about drones when relationship became sour

correction

I am not against drone strikes

I am against the kind of strikes that are done on civilians. just like the one done right after the RD flew back to US and the CIA launched a strike on an open air tribal gathering of elders attended by political agent Levis and Govt-tribal volunteers, for your information the gathering was not to wage war but related to regular tribal businesses and trade.

I also dont like the fact that the TTP leadership and their footsoldiers openly and in big numbers travel regularly under the drones but never get attacked, its a problem that has been picked up by the tribals against the Taliban and also brought up by Pakistan but that still continues. it seems that these drones act as guardian angels for them

by the way I already know your response to above.

 

[miss]

Too much hype over a simple report.
And so many countries have human rights issues. It's not limited to Pakistan only.

India doesnt have HR issues

 

[Solomon2]

Meanwhile in Waziristan and FATA

USA concerned on killings in Pakistan

Ah, the fallacious double-standard accusation rises again.

 

[Icarus]

India doesnt have HR issues

India just passed for Niravana, get a life, you're so deluded, I won't even waste time googling for you.
You live on in your own utopian paradise.

we should strike even harder to send a message

Carpet bomb us with B-52s? Oh I tremble at the thought! There will be an open slaughter of your soldiers in Afghanistan when that happens. You're hearing this from a man who worked with CENTCOM for two years, so you better believe it.

 

[Hulk]

India just passed for Niravana, get a life, you're so deluded, I won't even waste time googling for you.
You live on in your own utopian paradise.



Carpet bomb us with B-52s? Oh I tremble at the thought! There will be an open slaughter of your soldiers in Afghanistan when that happens. You're hearing this from a man who worked with CENTCOM for two years, so you better believe it.

With due respect sir, you are claiming something you cannot do even remotely. Help me understand how you think you can achieve it.

 

[KS]

I
Carpet bomb us with B-52s? Oh I tremble at the thought! There will be an open slaughter of your soldiers in Afghanistan when that happens. You're hearing this from a man who worked with CENTCOM for two years, so you better believe it.

Can you elaborate that part ?

We are talking about US Army here.

 

[Dance]

India doesnt have HR issues

Best post in the thread

 

[Icarus]

With due respect sir, you are claiming something you cannot do even remotely. Help me understand how you think you can achieve it.

My pleasure, You see, Pakistan is taking a lot of fire for America. We man thrice the number of posts NATO/ANA do to keep cross border movement under control. We often fight for American positions. We cleared the mountains separating the Bajaur and Kunnar provinces, the ISAF troops came, saw and fled because they were unable to free a road from Talib control. I had lost 6 men in clearing those posts so we took them under our command to. Though we have only enough (barely) rations to man our own positions, we keep these manned too. The moment we leave them for the Taliban, EVERY ISAF convoy entering the valley will be in a very unsafe position. There will be massive casualties, and this is just one such agency. The moment US attacks us (which they probably never will, but going by the argument at hand), we will simply abandon these positions, the rest, well, the US and their rivals will have to figure out something between them.

Is that clear?

 

[p(-)0ENiX]

India doesnt have HR issues

 

[KS]

My pleasure, You see, Pakistan is taking a lot of fire for America. We man thrice the number of posts NATO/ANA do to keep cross border movement under control. We often fight for American positions. We cleared the mountains separating the Bajaur and Kunnar provinces, the ISAF troops came, saw and fled because they were unable to free a road from Talib control. I had lost 6 men in clearing those posts so we took them under our command to. Though we have only enough (barely) rations to man our own positions, we keep these manned too. The moment we leave them for the Taliban, EVERY ISAF convoy entering the valley will be in a very unsafe position. There will be massive casualties, and this is just one such agency. The moment US attacks us (which they probably never will, but going by the argument at hand), we will simply abandon these positions, the rest, well, the US and their rivals will have to figure out something between them.

Is that clear?

Your threats are based on the assumption that they will still try to control the areas, even after you have vacated. Fair enough.

For arguments sake, what if they decide to pack from Afghanistan or even restrict their movements to well defended bases and decide to punish by just carpet bombing anything and everything..In essence what if they decide to unleash 21st century Mongol tactics to which Pakistan has no answer to.

 

[Ulysses]

There will be an open slaughter of your soldiers in Afghanistan when that happens. You're hearing this from a man who worked with CENTCOM for two years, so you better believe it.

OMG REALLY? Please tell me how Pakistan would achieve that because Pakistan cannot even take control of Karachi

 

[Irfan Baloch]

My pleasure, You see, Pakistan is taking a lot of fire for America. We man thrice the number of posts NATO/ANA do to keep cross border movement under control. We often fight for American positions. We cleared the mountains separating the Bajaur and Kunnar provinces, the ISAF troops came, saw and fled because they were unable to free a road from Talib control. I had lost 6 men in clearing those posts so we took them under our command to. Though we have only enough (barely) rations to man our own positions, we keep these manned too. The moment we leave them for the Taliban, EVERY ISAF convoy entering the valley will be in a very unsafe position. There will be massive casualties, and this is just one such agency. The moment US attacks us (which they probably never will, but going by the argument at hand), we will simply abandon these positions, the rest, well, the US and their rivals will have to figure out something between them.

Is that clear?

time and again my Indian friends move every single debate to their favored fantasy of an open war of America and Pakistan. no matter how unrelated the news but some how it will move there.

if there was any possibility of a conflict it would have had happened many times in the past but it has not because that's not what both countries would do. no matter how much Indians and Taliban wish it.

Pakistan and America share the same goals in this WoT only issue and argument is over execution and approach.

in diplomacy there are highs and lows followed by allegations and accusations and one way is to bring up non issues. Although being an ally its nice that America shows concern for the law and order situation in Balochistan but it can always help by actually intercepting and using drones on those Baloch Sardars who make regular visits to Afghanistan and come back loaded with weapons and bomb making material.

kicking out Bramdagh Bughti from the CIA safe house in Sweden would also help a lot.