S-2
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2007
- Messages
- 4,210
- Reaction score
- 0
"Ever heard of Zaid Hamid?"
Yes, something of a self-professed "expert" on security matters with some interestingly dubious perspectives. ISI had best hope he doesn't reflect their views. If so, they should lay off the scotch and sober up.
"Maybe I'm just jealous because I cannot dedicate the sort of time you do online."
Perhaps. OTOH, maybe you simply think and write considerably more slowly.
"From each according to his abilities to each according to their needs."
As your views are rarely required, so too your abilities. That's fortunate for you.
"Anyway about US plans for Baluchistan, well let's just leave all that and see what happens"
Ah...but that proves impossible for you, laddie.
"I too believe that China will not sit quietly since they've already paid for Gawadar."
Thanks for another anecdotal example of Pakistani "sovereignty".
(Staying more or less on topic.)
"I wonder how India still arms, trains and supplies BLA right under your noses in Afghanistan."
(Starting to drift...introduces India and BLA)
I do too. So much so that I openly question such and have an open S-2 challenge to provide the first incontrovertible photographic evidence that shows Indian officers training Baluchi nationalists from inside Afghanistan. A.M. has provided a blog alluding too an Indian brigadier attache paymaster. Beyond that?
The GoP has presented whatever case it believes to possess to two separate administrations. My government is evidently unimpressed, twice over. So much so that I've yet to read a comment by a senior official of either administration asserting that such a problem existed.
Have you checked with the Iranians? I've found interesting that the Iranians don't accuse India of supporting Baluchi separatists. Certainly there's no hue and cry that bespeaks a cause celebre' as with Pakistan. Do they not have their own baluchi insurgency? Do you presume the BLA only restricts it's movements and operations to Pakistan? That would seem a silly notion.
"My good friend...you would have solved most of the problems of this world by solving the Palestinian and Kashmir disputes by coercion one way or the other."
(Displays initial indications of a disturbed sensibility...a slight unhingement perhaps. Temperature clearly rising)
Somehow I imagine your zero-sum thinking would only work were we to leave a radioactive hole where both once stood. THAT would coercively resolve matters.
Short of that, somebody would always be left whining by how unfair it all was.
"No you had to go after Iraq lying to the world about their WMD's when even I knew that Iraq had none!"
(GONE...full blown rant. Terrible to see.)
You weren't on the White House's speed-dial, stud. It was never about WMD, though that was part of the demonstrated mix of volatility to his personal persona. It was simply that Saddam was in our way.
Bad guy with irridentist ambitions that interfere with American geo-strategic interests. The emperor signals...
With that...
Traumatic amputation was called for in a situation rapidly becoming gangrenous under the dubious effects of "sanctions" and "containment". Far better to exit stage right with that withered limb. So it was removed for the greater good.
"Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's murdered savagely, millions displaced.....their blood and their sufferings are in your hands, you do have faith right?"
Brandt: Her life is in your hands.
The Dude: Man, don't say that, man.
Brandt: Mr. Lebowski asked me to repeat that: her life is in your hands.
The Dude: Oh, ****, man.
Brandt: Her life is in your hands, Dude.
"You people will be judged in this life or the after for your savagery!"
Always entertaining.
Thanks.
Yes, something of a self-professed "expert" on security matters with some interestingly dubious perspectives. ISI had best hope he doesn't reflect their views. If so, they should lay off the scotch and sober up.
"Maybe I'm just jealous because I cannot dedicate the sort of time you do online."
Perhaps. OTOH, maybe you simply think and write considerably more slowly.
"From each according to his abilities to each according to their needs."
As your views are rarely required, so too your abilities. That's fortunate for you.
"Anyway about US plans for Baluchistan, well let's just leave all that and see what happens"
Ah...but that proves impossible for you, laddie.
"I too believe that China will not sit quietly since they've already paid for Gawadar."
Thanks for another anecdotal example of Pakistani "sovereignty".
(Staying more or less on topic.)
"I wonder how India still arms, trains and supplies BLA right under your noses in Afghanistan."
(Starting to drift...introduces India and BLA)
I do too. So much so that I openly question such and have an open S-2 challenge to provide the first incontrovertible photographic evidence that shows Indian officers training Baluchi nationalists from inside Afghanistan. A.M. has provided a blog alluding too an Indian brigadier attache paymaster. Beyond that?
The GoP has presented whatever case it believes to possess to two separate administrations. My government is evidently unimpressed, twice over. So much so that I've yet to read a comment by a senior official of either administration asserting that such a problem existed.
Have you checked with the Iranians? I've found interesting that the Iranians don't accuse India of supporting Baluchi separatists. Certainly there's no hue and cry that bespeaks a cause celebre' as with Pakistan. Do they not have their own baluchi insurgency? Do you presume the BLA only restricts it's movements and operations to Pakistan? That would seem a silly notion.
"My good friend...you would have solved most of the problems of this world by solving the Palestinian and Kashmir disputes by coercion one way or the other."
(Displays initial indications of a disturbed sensibility...a slight unhingement perhaps. Temperature clearly rising)
Somehow I imagine your zero-sum thinking would only work were we to leave a radioactive hole where both once stood. THAT would coercively resolve matters.
Short of that, somebody would always be left whining by how unfair it all was.
"No you had to go after Iraq lying to the world about their WMD's when even I knew that Iraq had none!"
(GONE...full blown rant. Terrible to see.)
You weren't on the White House's speed-dial, stud. It was never about WMD, though that was part of the demonstrated mix of volatility to his personal persona. It was simply that Saddam was in our way.
Bad guy with irridentist ambitions that interfere with American geo-strategic interests. The emperor signals...
With that...
Traumatic amputation was called for in a situation rapidly becoming gangrenous under the dubious effects of "sanctions" and "containment". Far better to exit stage right with that withered limb. So it was removed for the greater good.
"Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's murdered savagely, millions displaced.....their blood and their sufferings are in your hands, you do have faith right?"
Brandt: Her life is in your hands.
The Dude: Man, don't say that, man.
Brandt: Mr. Lebowski asked me to repeat that: her life is in your hands.
The Dude: Oh, ****, man.
Brandt: Her life is in your hands, Dude.
"You people will be judged in this life or the after for your savagery!"
Always entertaining.
Thanks.