What's new

US CDC's Dr Fauci was no saint himself, though he acted like 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Show the proof for your conspiracy. You can back your claims, right? You're not lying to us, are you?

Proof is in the OP video. ...so was duct tape used?

i-believe-alien.jpg
 
.
There's some hard trolling going on here. An attempt to get this thread deleted?

On the contrary here is scientific evidence courtesy research by the Shanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033698/

Our results demonstrated no evidence that the sequences of these four inserts are HIV-1 specific or the 2019-nCoV viruses obtain these insertions from HIV-1. First, the results of blast search of these motifs against GenBank shows that the top 100 identical or highly homologous hits are all from host genes of mammalian, insects, bacterial and others. There are only a few hits on coronaviruses, but none of them are HIV-1 related. Blast against viral sequence database also showed these insertion sequences widely exist in all kinds of viruses from bacteriophage, influenza, to giant eukaryotic viruses (Table 1).
 
. .
I watched the entire video. It never made that claim. You are a liar.

Why are you lying to us?

@The Eagle @Irfan Baloch @AgNoStiC MuSliM @WebMaster

See below results of scientific study by the Chinese that clearly debunk OP's conspiracy theory.



https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033698/

Our results demonstrated no evidence that the sequences of these four inserts are HIV-1 specific or the 2019-nCoV viruses obtain these insertions from HIV-1. First, the results of blast search of these motifs against GenBank shows that the top 100 identical or highly homologous hits are all from host genes of mammalian, insects, bacterial and others. There are only a few hits on coronaviruses, but none of them are HIV-1 related. Blast against viral sequence database also showed these insertion sequences widely exist in all kinds of viruses from bacteriophage, influenza, to giant eukaryotic viruses (Table 1).
 
.

You debunked nothing.

The original claim is

We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.

The study you referenced claims it was not inserted from HIV-1.

Those are different things.
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom