What's new

US carrier moves from Gulf to back up Afghan operations

ejaz007

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
6,533
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
US carrier moves from Gulf to back up Afghan operations

WASHINGTON (July 09 2008): A US aircraft carrier has moved to the Arabian Sea to support military operations in Afghanistan, leaving the Gulf without a carrier, US defence officials said Tuesday. The shift by the USS Abraham Lincoln over the weekend comes amid stepped up insurgent violence in Afghanistan where US combat casualties have been on the rise even as they have dropped sharply in Iraq.

The operations in Afghanistan and Iraq "are extremely dynamic and sometimes we have to adjust the posture of forces so we can we can take advantage of certain opportunities that are there," said a Navy official, who asked not to be identified.

The official emphasised that the repositioning of the Abraham Lincoln was unrelated to tensions with Iran, which Tuesday announced that the Revolutionary Guard forces were kicking off a new round of war games. "This is not a move in preparation for an attack on Iran. We're simply repositioning the capabilities to support the commanders on the ground down there," the official said.

Business Recorder [Pakistan's First Financial Daily]

USA is planning some thing other than the one stated in the report. Can anyone tell us what?
 
.
So how exactly would a carrier help in assisting a counter insurgency operation in Afghanistan. Without boots on the ground nothing can be achieved by air assault alone.
 
.
US carrier moves from Gulf to back up Afghan operations

WASHINGTON (July 09 2008): A US aircraft carrier has moved to the Arabian Sea to support military operations in Afghanistan, leaving the Gulf without a carrier, US defence officials said Tuesday. The shift by the USS Abraham Lincoln over the weekend comes amid stepped up insurgent violence in Afghanistan where US combat casualties have been on the rise even as they have dropped sharply in Iraq.

The operations in Afghanistan and Iraq "are extremely dynamic and sometimes we have to adjust the posture of forces so we can we can take advantage of certain opportunities that are there," said a Navy official, who asked not to be identified.

The official emphasised that the repositioning of the Abraham Lincoln was unrelated to tensions with Iran, which Tuesday announced that the Revolutionary Guard forces were kicking off a new round of war games. "This is not a move in preparation for an attack on Iran. We're simply repositioning the capabilities to support the commanders on the ground down there," the official said.

Business Recorder [Pakistan's First Financial Daily]

USA is planning some thing other than the one stated in the report. Can anyone tell us what?

Its just removing the carrier out of the strike range of the Iranian jets. Maybe Israel is planning something.

Regards
 
.
So how exactly would a carrier help in assisting a counter insurgency operation in Afghanistan. Without boots on the ground nothing can be achieved by air assault alone.
Carrier groups have large US Marine attachments who do a large share of the fighting in Afghanistan. They also provide air cover to troops on the ground and insert special forces (SEALS mostly) when needed.
 
.
So how exactly would a carrier help in assisting a counter insurgency operation in Afghanistan. Without boots on the ground nothing can be achieved by air assault alone.

by sending the aircraft carrier they are hoping carry it on Land and call it the mother of all tanks.


or at least give Kiazi the first Afgan Navy power, an achievment that not even the Russian could have done.
 
.
US carrier moves from Gulf to back up Afghan operations

WASHINGTON (July 09 2008): A US aircraft carrier has moved to the Arabian Sea to support military operations in Afghanistan, leaving the Gulf without a carrier, US defence officials said Tuesday. The shift by the USS Abraham Lincoln over the weekend comes amid stepped up insurgent violence in Afghanistan where US combat casualties have been on the rise even as they have dropped sharply in Iraq.

The operations in Afghanistan and Iraq "are extremely dynamic and sometimes we have to adjust the posture of forces so we can we can take advantage of certain opportunities that are there," said a Navy official, who asked not to be identified.

The official emphasised that the repositioning of the Abraham Lincoln was unrelated to tensions with Iran, which Tuesday announced that the Revolutionary Guard forces were kicking off a new round of war games. "This is not a move in preparation for an attack on Iran. We're simply repositioning the capabilities to support the commanders on the ground down there," the official said.

Business Recorder [Pakistan's First Financial Daily]

USA is planning some thing other than the one stated in the report. Can anyone tell us what?

since the question has been asked then in my opinion i am afraid chances are there that the U.S might be trying to secure or take out Pakistan's nuclear weapons ' plants & programs on the pretext of stopping it from falling into the wrong hands???? i think something has been cooking for some time now the bombing of the Indian consulate with afghan officials accusing ISI ,karzai's provocative statements increased suicide attacks inside Pakistan etc analyze the timing of these events one after the other this does sounds something dangerous Pakistan should not take things lightly it should be absolutely vigilant at all times trust me i don't know why but since i saw the news on TV i had a weird feeling about it.
 
.
USS Abraham Lincoln Moved Near Pakistani Coast, Special Forces Poised for Operations Inside Pakistan
Dated 11/7/2008

IBDEditorials.com reports that hawks in the Pentagon and CIA have managed to convince the White House to adopt a more aggressive, go-it-alone policy in response to Pakistan's failure to disrupt terrorist training camps and cross-border attacks against U.S. troops and the Afghan government.

Quoting the hard hitting piece:

Politics and diplomacy had not produced the desired results, and they've had ample opportunity to work. For nearly seven years now — as we've coaxed, cajoled and even bribed our "ally" with billions in aid — Osama bin Laden and his henchmen have remained hidden inside Pakistan's tribal areas. Patience with Islamabad has run out. It's time for unilateral military action.

The U.S. military confirms it is sending extra air power to the Afghanistan-Pakistan border by moving the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln from the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman. The battle group ostensibly will provide air support for special forces who reportedly have been given the green light — after tumultuous debate within the White House — to conduct raids deep inside Pakistan's tribal belt to eradicate al-Qaida and Taliban bases.

Islamabad's ineffective campaign makes it "imperative that U.S. forces be allowed to pursue the Taliban and al-Qaida in tribal areas inside Pakistan," said Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas. "If we don't do something now, they're going to strike us again (in the U.S.), and it is going to be out of this area."

At the same time, President Bush confirmed rumors he's authorized a troop escalation in the region in 2009. He didn't offer details, but Pentagon officials expect about 6,000 in reinforcements, raising U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan to about 40,000.

Build Up

• A 2006 peace deal brokered by Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf that has led to a 40% increase in the number of cross-border attacks from Pakistan's tribal belt, where insurgents now operate with impunity.

• U.S. intelligence reports showing al-Qaida's leadership has carved out a secure base inside the tribal area, along with a band of camps for training a new cadre of Western-looking terrorists to attack the U.S.

• Reports that the flow of foreign fighters and funding into the Pakistani border region from the Middle East has soared as jihadists relocate from Iraq.

• U.S. and Afghan intelligence showing evidence the Pakistani military is arming, training and sharing logistical data with Taliban insurgents to help them target U.S. and Afghan troops.

• A border incident last month in which Pakistani soldiers fired on U.S. forces.

• Evidence the Pakistani government may be behind a campaign to destabilize the U.S.-backed Afghan government, including assassination attempts on Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

• The bombing of the Indian embassy in Kabul, which killed 41 including Indian officials. Karzai has blamed Pakistan's military intelligence agency.

USS Abraham Lincoln Moved Near Pakistani Coast, Special Forces Poised for Operations Inside Pakistan | India Defence

Latest on the reported buildup.
Regards,
 
.
Carrier groups have large US Marine attachments who do a large share of the fighting in Afghanistan. They also provide air cover to troops on the ground and insert special forces (SEALS mostly) when needed.

Any idea of what attachments this carrier battle group actually have?
 
.
Any idea of what attachments this carrier battle group actually have?

A CBG is an independent group taking care of air attack/defense. Destroyers and submarines for ASW/AAW role. And optional expeditionary force. Normally US carriers are with this force which are mainly from marine commando units.
They normally don't carry heavy ground equipments like tanks, but armored troop carriers are a must.
 
.
Allied forces advance on Pak-Afghan borders
Updated at: 1320 PST, Tuesday, July 15, 2008


PESHAWAR: Allied troops’ movement on Pak-Afghan borders in North and South Waziristan has geared up.

Hundreds of Allied troops armed with their choppers, tanks, mortars and high-tech weapons have arrived at the Pak-Afghan borders, while the tribesmen viewing the situation threatening have started shifting from the bordering areas. Sources said that hundreds of Allied troops armed with their helicopters, tanks, mortars and high-tech weapons have started arriving since last night near the bordering areas Ghulam Khan, Shawal, Amir Chapsar and Alwara. Allied forces warplanes were also seen hovering over these areas, sources said.

Following the arrival of Allied troops and hovering of the aircrafts in the sky, the tribesmen fearing the worst have started evacuating these bordering areas. On the other hand, Utmanzai tribe leader, Haji Muhammad Afzal has announced in a Jirga that if the Allied forces dared to step in the tribal land, then the 2 million strong tribesmen would forcefully retaliate with shrouds wrapped on their heads.

Allied forces advance on Pak-Afghan borders

Picture beginning to emerge. Hope sense prevails.
Regards,
 
.
Well not to forget the recent statement in this context by our coward prime minister Gillani that another 9/11 type of attack can be planned in this area. This gives a clear indication that GOP is well aware of that and infact they are making ways for them.

Thanks to people of Pakistan for choosing PPP and Asif ali Zardari.
 
.
The Yanks are coming

By Dr Farrukh Saleem
7/13/2008
One, in the month of June, for the first time ever, there were more coalition military fatalities in Afghanistan than in Iraq. Two, on July 7, President George Bush told the US News and World Report (US News & World Report - Breaking News, World News, Business News, and America's Best Colleges - USNews.com) that the "biggest challenge for the next president of the United States would be Pakistan and not Iraq or even Afghanistan."

Three, Captain Patrick Hall, Commanding Officer of USS Abraham Lincoln, has new orders. This Nimitz-class, nuclear-powered aircraft carrier has been ordered out of the Persian Gulf into the Arabian Sea. The Abraham Lincoln Strike Group has USS Abraham Lincoln as the nucleus of the carrier battle group which include the following: a Ticonderoga class guided-missile cruiser that carries Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles; an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer; a Spruance-class destroyer for anti-submarine warfare; an Oliver Hazard Perry-class guided missile frigate; a Los Angeles-class submarine, a Sacramento-class fast combat support ship and replenishment ships.

Abraham Lincoln has enough electricity generating capability to power 100,000 homes. Abraham Lincoln has three strike fighter squadrons of F/A-18 Hornets, a marine fighter attack squadron, an electronic attack squadron of EA-6B Prowlers, a squadron of S-3B Vikings, an early warning squadron of E-2C Hawkeyes and one helicopter antisubmarine squadron of SH-60F and HH-60H Seahawks.

Four, on July 10, General David Petraeus, the commanding general Multi-National Force-Iraq (MNF-I), was confirmed by the United States Senate as commander, United States Central Command (CENTCOM is a "theatre-level Unified Combatant Command" whose area of responsibility include Pakistan and Afghanistan).

Five, on May 22, General David Petraeus endorsed a US intelligence "assessment that the next 9/11-type attack on the US soil would come from Al Qaeda bases in Pakistan…"

Six, on April 12, during an interview with ABC News, President George Bush said that "Pakistan, and not Afghanistan or Iraq, is now the most likely place where a plot could be hatched to carry out any 9/11-type attack in the US"

Seven, Robert Mueller, director of the Untied States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), in prepared remarks, told the Council on Foreign Relations (Council on Foreign Relations), that "Al Qaeda has found new sanctuaries in the ungoverned spaces, tribal areas, and frontier provinces of Pakistan. As a result, Al Qaeda is regenerating its capability to attack."

Eight, on April 6, US Senate Democrats sent a letter to President George Bush "urging him to shift anti-terror efforts from Iraq to Afghanistan and Pakistan." The letter said the "White House has committed too much of US resources to Iraq while neglecting 'terror-havens' of Afghanistan and Pakistan." The letter also asserted that "While violence and the drug trade have surged in Afghanistan and Pakistan's security remains fragile, we are distracted by an endless civil war in Iraq."

Nine, on July 5, Michael Chertoff, the chief of America's Homeland Security, said, "Al Qaeda is regrouping in the border areas of Pakistan " and that he fears that "Al Qaeda and other militant organizations could resume their activities after turning the Pakistani tribal areas bordering Afghanistan into their centre."

Ten, on July 10, the New York Times, quoting American military and intelligence officials, wrote: "There has been an increase in recent months in the number of foreign fighters who have travelled to Pakistan's tribal areas to join with militants there. The flow may reflect a change that is making Pakistan, not Iraq, the preferred destination for some Sunni extremists from the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia who are seeking to take up arms against the west."

General Petraeus has defeated Al Qaeda in Iraq, physically and ideologically. On July 11, Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told BBC, "Pakistan was not doing enough to stop militants from crossing over into Afghanistan." What is Battlefield Band's next destination?

PS: Pakistan is on fire. The chief fireman is in Dubai. The fire platoon chief is in London. All other fire lieutenants are either in Kuala Lumpur, New York or just up in the sky floating around at state expense. When was the last time Sonia Gandhi invited her party to Dubai?
 
.
Well not to forget the recent statement in this context by our coward prime minister Gillani that another 9/11 type of attack can be planned in this area. This gives a clear indication that GOP is well aware of that and infact they are making ways for them.

Thanks to people of Pakistan for choosing PPP and Asif ali Zardari.

Frankly, any other government (civilian/military) would do the exact same thing.

I doubt the PPP has a choice in this matter.

You cannot confront Uncle Sam... and cannot avoid the collateral damage... so the best way is to minimize civilian casualties, win the propaganda war against the fundamentalists and bargain hard with Uncle Sam...
 
.
Is the US Preparing To Attack Pakistan?

by Eric Margolis

The Bush Administration may be preparing to lash out at old ally Pakistan, which Washington now blames for its humiliating failures to crush al-Qaida, capture its elusive leaders, or defeat Taliban resistance forces in Afghanistan.

One is immediately reminded of the Vietnam War when the Pentagon, unable to defeat North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong forces, urged invasion of Cambodia.

Sources in Washington say the Pentagon is drawing up plans to attack Pakistan’s "autonomous" tribal region bordering Afghanistan. Limited "hot pursuit" ground incursions by US forces based in Afghanistan, intensive air attacks, and special forces raids into Pakistan’s autonomous tribal region are being evaluated.
This weekend, the US national intelligence chief and other intelligence spokesmen confirmed that strikes against "terrorist targets" in Pakistan’s tribal belt are increasingly possible. These warnings were designed to both further pressure Pakistan’s beleaguered strongman, President Pervez Musharraf into sending more troops to the tribal areas to fight his own people, and to prepare US public opinion for a possible widening of the Afghanistan war into Pakistan.

Pakistan’s 27,200 sq km tribal belt, officially known as the Federal Autonomous Tribal Area, or FATA, is home to 3.3 million Pashtun tribesmen. It has become a safe haven for al-Qaida, Taliban, other Afghan resistance groups, and a hotbed of anti-American activity, thanks mostly to the US-led occupation of Afghanistan which drove many militants across the border into Pakistan. Osama bin Laden is very likely sheltered in this region, as US intelligence claims.

I spent a remarkable time in this wild, medieval region during the 1980’s and 90’s, traveling alone where even Pakistani government officials dared not go, visiting the tribes of Waziristan, Orakzai, Khyber, Chitral, and Kurram, and meeting their chiefs, called "maliks."

These tribal belts are always referred to as "lawless." Pashtun tribesmen could shoot you if they didn’t like your looks. Rudyard Kipling warned British Imperial soldiers over a century ago, when fighting cruel, ferocious Pashtun warriors of the Afridi clan, if they fell wounded, "save your last bullet for yourself."
But there is law: the traditional Pashtun tribal code, Pashtunwali, that strictly governs behavior and personal honor. Protecting guests was sacred. I was captivated by this majestic mountain region and wrote of it extensively in my book, "War at the Top of the World."

The 40 million Pashtun – called "Pathan" by the British – are the world’s largest tribal group. Imperial Britain divided them by an artificial border, the Durand Line, which went on to become, like so many other British colonial boundaries, today’s Afghanistan-Pakistan border. When Pakistan was created in 1947, the Pashtun were split between that new nation and Afghanistan.

Pakistan’s Pashtun number 28–30 million, plus an additional 2.5 million refugees from Afghanistan. Pashtuns, one of the British Indian Army’s famed "martial races," occupy many senior positions in Pakistan’s military, intelligence service and bureaucracy, and naturally have much sympathy for their embattled tribal cousins in Afghanistan. The 15 million Pashtun of Afghanistan form that nation’s largest ethnic group and just under half the population.

The tribal agency’s Pashtun reluctantly joined newly-created Pakistan in 1947 under express constitutional guarantee of total autonomy and a ban on Pakistani troops ever entering there.

But under intense US pressure, President Pervez Musharraf violated Pakistan’s constitution by sending 80,000 federal troops to fight the region’s tribes, killing 3,000 of them. In best British imperial tradition, Washington pays Musharraf $100 million monthly to rent his sepoys (native soldiers) to fight Pashtun tribesmen. As a result, Pakistan is fast edging towards civil war, as the bloody siege of Islamabad’s Red Mosque and a current wave of bombings across the nation show.

The anti-Communist Taliban movement is part of the Pashtun people. Taliban fighters move across the artificial Pakistan-Afghanistan border, to borrow a Maoism, like fish through the sea. Osama bin Laden is a hero in the region, and likely shelters there.

The US just increased its reward for bin Laden to $50 million and plans to shower $750 million on the tribal region in an effort to buy loyalty. Bush/Cheney & Co. do not understand that while they can rent President Musharraf’s government in Islamabad, many Pashtun value personal honor far more than money, and cannot be bought. That is likely why bin Laden has not yet been betrayed.

Any US attack on Pakistan would be a catastrophic mistake. First, air and ground assaults will succeed only in widening the anti-US war and merging it with Afghanistan’s resistance to western occupation. US forces are already too over-stretched to get involved in yet another little war.

Second, Pakistan’s army officers who refuse to be bought may resist a US attack on their homeland, and overthrow the man who allowed it, Gen. Musharraf. A US attack would sharply raise the threat of anti-US extremists seizing control of strategic Pakistan and marginalize those seeking return to democratic government.

Third, a US attack on the tribal areas could re-ignite the old irredentist movement to reunite Pashtun parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan into an independent state, "Pashtunistan." That could begin unraveling fragile Pakistan, leaving its nuclear arsenal up for grabs, and India tempted to intervene.

The US military has grown used to attacking small, weak nations like Grenada, Panama, and Iraq. Pakistan, with 163 million people, and a poorly equipped but very tough 550,000-man army, will offer no easy victories. Those Bush Administration officials who foolishly advocate attacking Pakistan are playing with fire.
 
.
Afghan NATO force hits targets inside Pakistan

Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:41am EDT
(Recasts with strikes inside Pakistan)

By Jonathon Burch

KABUL, July 16 (Reuters) - NATO forces in Afghanistan hit targets inside Pakistan with artillery and attack helicopters after coming under rocket fire from across the border, the alliance said on Wednesday.

Tension is high along the border with a sharp rise in attacks in eastern Afghanistan coming from inside Pakistan that Afghan and NATO officials blame on de-facto ceasefires between the Pakistani military and militants in its lawless tribal belt.

Troops from NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) "received multiple rocket attacks from militants inside Pakistan, July 15," the alliance said in a statement.

"The troops identified a (compound) as the point of origin of the attacks and responded in self-defence with a combination of fire from attack helicopters and artillery into Pakistan."

Nine Afghan soldiers were wounded by the rocket attacks and ISAF responded immediately, an ISAF spokesman said. ISAF and the Pakistani army "coordinated their operation closely from the outset. The Pakistani military agreed to assist and search the area if the border firing continued," the statement said.

Despite cooperation and open lines of communication between army commanders on both sides of the border, Afghan leaders have blamed Pakistani agents for a string of attacks.

These have included a suicide bomb on the Kabul Indian Embassy last week that killed 58 people and an April assassination bid on President Hamid Karzai.

Pakistan rejects the accusations and says the Afghan government is trying to deflect criticism of its own failure to stem the rising tide of Taliban violence.



NO GROUND INCURSION

The U.S. military, which provides the vast majority of troops in eastern Afghanistan, says attacks are up by 40 percent in the area over the last year, partly because of increased penetration of their soldiers into the mountainous region.

Another factor is the ceasefires in Pakistan which help secure the militants' rear.

But while cross-border firing has gone up from both sides, NATO denied it had any intention of mounting any incursion onto Pakistani soil.

"There is not, nor is there going to be, an incursion of NATO troops into Pakistan. There is no planning for, no mandate for, an incursion of NATO troops into Pakistan," NATO spokesman James Appathurai told a news briefing in Brussels.

But, he said, NATO troops "have the right to fire back in self-defence into Pakistan."

Western forces in Afghanistan are coming under increased pressure as the traditional summer fighting season gets into full swing with security analysts predicting July could be the worst month of violence yet since the Taliban's fall in 2001.

Already more U.S. troops were killed in Afghanistan in May and June than in Iraq and there are less than a quarter the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan.

The Taliban have seized the initiative and the headlines in recent weeks with a series of high profile attacks.

U.S. troops pulled out of a remote outpost in northeastern Afghanistan, three days after Taliban militants briefly breached the defences and killed nine U.S. soldiers, the biggest single loss of life for American forces in Afghanistan since 2005.

Foreign troops have also come under pressure in Afghanistan from a series of charges that their aircraft killed civilians.

Four women, four girls and an eight-year-old boy were killed in airstrikes in the western province of Farah on Tuesday, local officials said. (Writing by Jon Hemming; Editing by Charles Dick)



© Thomson Reuters 2008. All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.

Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.

Afghan NATO force hits targets inside Pakistan | Reuters.com
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom