US-based Sikh rights group to rally behind Sangeeta Richard

[telugodu]

Indian fight among themselves to defend a criminal.

lol...After all we are famous for fighting among ourselves...

There is no logic in this thread .

Logic was gone when instead of debating the actions of a American Sikhs right group people started questioning and mud slinging Sikhism and Hinduism and patriotism of Sikhs and Hindus .

hehe don't blame me for that...
Blame the cheerleaders who like to project themselves as saviors of the minority...

 

[Aka123]

Ours was the most developed in every parameter until you jealous dravids got jealous. Listen hanuman, take that shiv ling out of our mouth and see the reality we are superior to you in every possible way: in beauty, in intelligence, in culture. It is a shame dravids call themselves Indians when that is a name for us, not hanumans. Please for the love of your gau mata durga DO NOT ASSOCIATE WITH US. A creature to stupid to realize the vedas were satirical, let me say that one more time, the vedas were satirical.

Stop!! Don't cross the limits!!

I know this guy.

He is the one who threatened to murder me for eating Meat.

Probably his suspension ran out. Quite sad indeed.



I don't know much Hindi either dude.

Sorry

That veggie will murder u.

 

[DesiGuy]

You better should not generalize things. Not all overseas Sikhs are anti-national and I'm one of them.

correct and the ones that are doing are khalistanis. basically they have no balls to go to india and do this.

 

[telugodu]

correct and the ones that are doing are khalistanis. basically they have no balls to go to india and do this.

But they like to call themselves as KINGS!!!

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

@Arya Desa - Are you out of your mind? Want to peddle Indophobia? There's a pretty country to our West. Go there and water your plants.

haha

Arya Desa is anti-Pakistan most of the times. And its funny no one tried to counter his aurgments, after all Hindu religion is gift given by Punjabis who only make 2% of Indian popualtion. So instead of respecting punjabis you guys hate them.

 

[telugodu]

haha

Arya Desa is anti-Pakistan most of the times. And its funny no one tried to counter his aurgments, after all Hindu religion is gift given by Punjabis who only make 2% of Indian popualtion. So instead of respecting punjabis you guys hate them.

out of mind?

 

[Manvantaratruti]

Lols denial is a virtue. And let readers decide who is Idiot. And political alliance with muslim invaders against their own Hindu brothers? Thats called cowardice and betryal. If alliance with enemies of India is not betryal then what it is? Or now you will call those muslim invaders and mughals as friends of India?

Sure......mythical stories of Jaichand and Pritviraj is what passes for history in pdf

At the time Ghauri's invation there was NO internet to tell those kings what a great danger islamic invasion was to do to India. Nor did they have the hind sight of a 1000 years of history to advice them.

All they knew was an barbaric king invaded and they used that to settle they own political ambition. The way it happens anywhere in the world. LOL.

That is pretty much the same way it played out with the British too. No one expected a bunch of traders to take over the whole world and establish the greatest empire known to mankind.

There was NO betrayal of Hinduism since no one knew Hinduism was in danger. Before the islamic invasion NO one in India had experienced ANYTHING similar to it.

The only thing close to it is the Christian invasion of India and the Sikhs in US supporting that invasion. Now that is a betrayal and cowardice worth talking about. Think about that.

 

[telugodu]

Sure......mythical stories of Jaichand and Pritviraj is what passes for history in pdf

At the time Ghauri's invation there was NO internet to tell those kings what a great danger islamic invasion was to do to India. Nor did they have the hind sight of a 1000 years of history to advice them.

All they knew was an barbaric king invaded and they used that to settle they own political ambition. The way it happens anywhere in the world. LOL.

That is pretty much the same way it played out with the British too. No one expected a bunch of traders to take over the whole world and establish the greatest empire known to mankind.

There was NO betrayal of Hinduism since no one knew Hinduism was in danger. Before the islamic invasion NO one in India had experienced ANYTHING similar to it.

The only thing close to it is the Christian invasion of India and the Sikhs in US supporting that invasion. Now that is a betrayal and cowardice worth talking about. Think about that.

totally agreed with you bro...

 

[Bhai Zakir]

@Flamingo

Lady sometimes you claim of being a Kashmiri, sometimes Sikh and so on. Looks like you set your identity, according to your arguments rather than what it really is.

What's wrong in it?? There are millions of sikhs living in Kashmir for hundreds of year, formerly Sikhs even ruled Kashmir.

as on the topic: There are not Sikh but the paid puppet of CIA.

 

[telugodu]

What's wrong in it?? There are millions of sikhs living in Kashmir for hundreds of year, formerly Sikhs even ruled Kashmir.

Were those sikhs living in kashmir like to be with india or pakistan?

 

[Jaggu]

Hindu Indians were not particularly know for the loyalty to the British crown. Sikhs were.

Look up history and role of Sikhs in the 1857 struggle for Independence.

Your sense of history is full of half truths and out right distorted. How can you paint the Sikhs as treacherous? during the Anglo Sikh wars, the Hindu Dogras had betrayed the Sikhs and were awarded Kashmir as a result of their treachery. Going by your logic does that mean all Hindus were traitors?

As for 1857, the Sikhs view that conflict is very differently than mainstream point of view. The soldiers/sepoys who had mutinied in 1857 had fought with the Sikhs just 8 years earlier during the 2nd anglo Sikh war and taken away our freedom. Secondly the sepoys had decided to make the Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah their king and Sikhs faced their worst genocides under Mughal rule and did not have an appetite to see the Mughal King again ruling over India. Furthurmore, what about all the Hindus such as Dogras, Gurkhas, Rajputs all of whom joined the British in 1857 along with the Sikhs during the mutiny? going by your logic does that mean all the Hindus of Rajasthan, Punjab, Nepal were also traitors?

Sikhs also had many anti British movements and played a prominent role in the freedom struggle which was led by Baba Maharaj Singh, Kuka Movement under Baba Raam Singh, Gadhar movement, Akali movement. Even INA was 60% Sikh soldiers. Kala Pani was full of Sikh inmates.

So it is established. You are Stupid

The original poster merely pointed out that Sikhs have a history of Anti India activities which is specifically inspired by their religion.

That happens to be a fact.

Recent Sikh anti-National activities were/are inspired by religion. He is just calling a spade a spade. If you cannot handle the truth why blame him ?

No sir, Sikhs do not have a history of Anti India activities. Sikh religion has inspired Sikhs to fight against unjust rule of the Mughals, Afghans, British and later the anti-Indian party known as the congress party which is being ruled by the Nehru dynasty.

 

[telugodu]

Your sense of history is full of half truths and out right distorted. How can you paint the Sikhs as treacherous? during the Anglo Sikh wars, the Hindu Dogras had betrayed the Sikhs and were awarded Kashmir as a result of their treachery. Going by your logic does that mean all Hindus were traitors?

As for 1857, the Sikhs view that conflict very differently than mainstream point of view. The soldiers/sepoys who had mutinied in 1857 had fought with the Sikhs just 8 years earlier during the 2nd anglo Sikh war and taken away our freedom. Secondly the sepoys had decided to make the Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah their king and Sikhs faced their worst genocides under Mughal rule and did not have an appetite to see the Mughal King again ruling over India. Furthurmore, what about all the Hindus such as Dogras, Gurkhas, Rajputs all of whom joined the British in 1857 along with the Sikhs during the matinee? going by your logic does that mean all the Hindus of Rajasthan, Punjab, Nepal were also traitors?

Sikhs also had many anti British movements and played a prominent role in the freedom struggle which was led by Baba Maharaj Singh, Kuka Movement under Baba Raam Singh, Gadhar movement, Akali movement. Even INA was 60% Sikh soldiers. Kala Pani was full of Sikh inmates.

Which caste hindus are you referring to...

 

[Butchcassidy]

I happen to agree that the Sikhs are no saints.

They have a good record or fighting for Indian freedom, but also have a record of being slaves to the British rule and enforcing British rule over India.

Their loyalty swings both ways a load of

ULFA, BODO, MAOIST are not Hindu organization. Are you stupid ? VHP is a Hindu organization.

Protest in US was specifically by a SIKH organization.



No.

Hindu Indians were not particularly know for the loyalty to the British crown. Sikhs were.

Look up history and role of Sikhs in the 1857 struggle for Independence.

What a load of bull shit. 1857 was a sepoy mutiny. The same very sepoy who licked british shoes and helped them fight the maratthas, sikhs and even afghans.... So suddenly in 1857 these sepoys who had been british stooges became freedom fighters... What a logic lol.

 

[telugodu]

What a load of bull shit. 1857 was a sepoy mutiny. The same very sepoy who licked british shoes and helped them fight the maratthas, sikhs and even afghans.... So suddenly in 1857 these sepoys who had been british stooges became freedom fighters... What a logic lol.

Even that preet bakoda is a sikh...
All sikhs are not khalistanis, but all khalistanis are sikhs...

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

out of mind?

A fact which your mind can't comprehend.