What's new

US Asks Pakistan to Restrain its Nuclear and Missile Programs

Well Pakistan is a tolorent country , and we maintain a stock pile just enough for out defence needs

But due to the international threats , we feel its necessary to test all outcomes in nuclear technology and missile technology

USA has no right to demand anything , however a suggestion would be heard in our parliment , and nothing more, the defence need is analyzed daily

Since we as a Nation Don't ask limitation on USA nuclear program , as such we don't expect any demands on our program
 
. . .
Yes, you're right. But UN and Other P5+1 nations has sole veto authority to stress when number of Nuclear materials goes uncontrollable. so, wait and watch .
lol that authority wont work with us. Since we have reliable allies whom we can count on. Even if u sanction us, it wont stop our goals and objectives like u have done that in the past.

So best of luck to u.
 
Last edited:
. .
lol that authority wont work with us. Since we reliable allies who we can count on. Even if u sanction us, it wont stop our goals and objectives like u have done that in the past.

So best of luck to u.
You cannot compare youself to others. Still, All the best.

India finalises 10 billion dollars missile deal with Russia

Based on Indian purchase of S-400 , we must work on multi stage and multiple war head missiles now !!!
There is not other Option we have been forced

I understand your point, but you have to notice that India purchase for Defence. This is cannot be taken as aggression. Any aggressive missile strike would cause yourself in the race. But I don't see this deal as aggressive strike capability. It is only defence.
 
.
in international relations all equal. Its under UN charter. Plus Pakistan itself is a very powerful country in her own, and way to strategically important to be rolled over.

Funny thing about that strategic importance is it is relevant and useful as long as Pakistan lets others access that land, those passes, which open up to Central Asia. If it does not, it naturally becomes an enemy. So, your value lies in letting yourself being used by others, nothing else. That's what pretty much has happened since Pakistan's inception, first US and now China.
 
.
I understand your point, but you have to notice that India purchase for Defence. This is cannot be taken as aggression. Any aggressive missile strike would cause yourself in the race. But I don't see this deal as aggressive strike capability. It is only defence.
First understand what scenario Pakistan faces and why we do it. Anti Ballistic missile system is just part of it.

India Is Building a Top-Secret Nuclear City to Produce Thermonuclear Weapons, Experts Say

Pakistan should go for a Nuclear Future, Not a Deal!
 
.
Yes, you're right. But UN and Other P5+1 nations has sole veto authority to stress when number of Nuclear materials goes uncontrollable. so, wait and watch .
ok supa pawa endian and before that proposal even somehow enters UN it will be vetod by china at the UN gates, all this that we have isolated pakistan is just the khyali pallao in enndians mind.Pakistan has more friends then india can eve have and that too without them milking us by buying weapons from them, india friends are those countires who milk you for buying weapons they are not freinds they are selling you weapons and if you think they will help you in some other kind then good for you
 
Last edited:
.
Funny thing about that strategic importance is it is relevant and useful as long as Pakistan lets others access that land, those passes, which open up to Central Asia. If it does not, it naturally becomes an enemy. So, your value lies in letting yourself being used by others, nothing else. That's what pretty much has happened since Pakistan's inception, first US and now China.
It means Pakistan would decide who get what based on our own interests.
 
.
Sorry US. Imbalance in conventional arms doesn't allow us to slow our nuclear and missile program. Since you are somewhat reluctant to provide conventional weapons to close this gap, we will have to further accelerate our nuclear program and its delivery systems.

Thanks for your concern though.


Exactly now please pile up your nukes.It is just quite entertaining when all those is eating majority development fund of Pakistan.
 
. .
It means Pakistan would decide who get what based on our own interests.
It means you get money only if there is transit, no money, if no transit. Also, bulk of the money is in production and sales, not in transit.
And unlike, the 60s or 70s now there are alternate routes opening up. So there is a competition for the transit route too. Its not like a Panama canal.
 
.
ok supa pawa ****** and before that proposal even somehow enters UN it will be vetod by china at the UN gates, all this that we have isolated pakistan is just the khyali pallao in enndians mind.Pakistan has more friends then india can eve have and that too without them milking us by buying weapons from them, india friends are those countires who milk you for buying weapons they are not freinds they are selling you weapons and if you think they will help you in some other kind then good for you

What kind of friends is that ??
In real world there is no free lunch .
Money always talks if you want dignity and honour .Or you should do some other wet jobs.:D
 
.
I don't know why US asks for such kind of stuff from Pakistan. When it already knows Pakistan's answer. :rolleyes:

Money always talks if you want dignity and honour .Or you should do some other wet jobs.:D

I don't think other people would be interested in your source of living. :rolleyes:
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom