US asks China to explain why it needs aircraft carrier

[rcrmj]

Why can't you accept what is being said? Your modification help ease to your ears? Be it, then ....

stupid people defend stupidity``thats all we can see here you defending the dumdum question`

 

[Peter]

not as much as seeing americans being stupid`just like the question regarding chinese first training carrier`

Are you sure? Let's hear the voices of your people: China's Conundrum: Angry at U.S. but Trapped in Treasurys

 

[888jamie888]

Of course the US knew the answer to the question. They just want an answer so they can catch China out later on, if they use it for purposes other than training.

 

[Obambam]

Why can't you accept what is being said? Your modification help ease to your ears? Be it, then ....

It is not the case of me not being able to accept, I am very happy with such a question being presented to us in front of camera.
You seem to be the only one here defending the stupid question.

Can't help it, lets see the question again shall we?

“We would welcome any kind of explanation that China would like to give for needing this kind of equipment” U.S. State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland

 

[Sanchez]

Of course the US knew the answer to the question. They just want an answer so they can catch China out later on, if they use it for purposes other than training.

The administration needs to play "tough" to comfort the cow boys of the Congress. It'd be childish to have an answer from others and then sit on it tight.

A fully equiped training carrier could undoubtedly be deployed into a war scenario for a "research purpose"...hh

 

[superNova]

china can answer, 'to create peace around the wold like united states'

 

[Peter]

It is not the case of me not being able to accept, I am very happy with such a question being presented to us in front of camera.
You seem to be the only one here defending the stupid question.

Can't help it, lets see the question again shall we?

“We would welcome any kind of explanation that China would like to give for needing this kind of equipment” U.S. State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland

Let I put it in a simple english for you ...

“We would welcome any kind of bolognese that China would like to give for needing this kind of equipment” U.S. State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland.

But Everything You Say And Do Can And Will Be Used Against You ... later on

 

[Peter]

china can answer, 'to create peace around the wold like united states'

We know, that is a bolognese ....

 

[rcrmj]

Let I put it in a simple english for you ...

“We would welcome any kind of bolognese that China would like to give for needing this kind of equipment” U.S. State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland.

But Everything You Say And Do Can And Will Be Used Against You ... later on

you make the dumb question even dumber``well done, never know some people from 'super power' country can be this dumb``

an idiodic question from your State Department spokesperson is not the end of day for U.S``you dont need to save your american's face``we all know what very well``

 

[Tshering22]

china can answer, 'to create peace around the wold like united states'

But that would mean deviating from their current stand of 'not being interested to become the world police', isn't it? Making statements in politics has big consequences. US is already on a warpath while China is still emerging rapidly. Chinese statements will be of more concern than what the Harbinger of Democracy has to say.

 

[Peter]

you make the dumb question even dumber``well done, never know some people from 'super power' country can be this dumb``

an idiodic question from your State Department spokesperson is not the end of day for U.S``you dont need to save your american's face``we all know what very well``

Is that all you can say or think of? No wonder why your people and your government got so angry at US and can't do nothing about it!

China's Conundrum: Angry at U.S. but Trapped in Treasurys

It is understandable ....

 

[no_name]

Not really something to be proud of when you own people money...

 

[somebozo]

China is doing a dumb mistake by parking its foreign reserves into treasury bills which are worth less than toilet paper. It should use its cash to buy tech and build industry.

 

[RusoIndian]

US might as well ask India Italy Russia Thailand and France why they also need aircraft carriers

 

[no_name]

China is under embargo where it comes to high techs they really want. The trade imbalance is partly due to their inability to trade for high tech stuff, where as the lower level manufacturing they are already sufficient.