What's new

US aircraft carrier group deployed for ‘routine patrols’ in S. China Sea

BHarwana

MODERATOR
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
24,827
Reaction score
20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
US aircraft carrier group deployed for ‘routine patrols’ in S. China Sea


58a906b9c461886c598b45fe.jpg

Ignoring repeated warnings from Beijing not to aggravate tensions in Southeast Asia, the US Navy has deployed an aircraft carrier strike group for “routine” maritime patrols in the vicinity of the disputed South China Sea waters.
The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson, together with aircraft from the Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 2, and the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Wayne E. Meyer started “routine operations in the South China,” the US Navy announced.
The deployment of the Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 1 began Saturday, just days after China issued a stern warning to stay away from the area.

“China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent waters,” China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said Wednesday. “China respects and upholds the freedom of navigation and overflight in the South China Sea which countries enjoy under international law, but firmly opposes any country’s attempt to undermine China’s sovereignty and security in the name of the freedom of navigation and overflight.”

Despite the warning, US patrols got underway in the disputed waters, right after an American flotilla held drills off the islands of Hawaii and Guam to “maintain and improve their readiness and develop cohesion as a strike group.”

“The training completed over the past few weeks has really brought the team together and improved our effectiveness and readiness as a strike group,” said Rear Adm. James Kilby, commander of CSG 1. “We are looking forward to demonstrating those capabilities while building upon existing strong relationships with our allies, partners and friends in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region.”
As tensions between US and China intensify, the US Navy appears to continue disregard Beijing’s interests in the immediate proximity of the disputed islands, claiming the moves are designed to ensure the principles of freedom of navigation in international waters.
The Spratly Islands, or Spratlys, comprise more than 750 islets, atolls, and reefs, and lie off the coastlines of Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and China, with all the claimants having their own national names for the archipelago. Beijing persists in claiming the reefs in defiance of a ruling issued by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at the Hague.

While freedom of navigation and military drills accelerated under President Barack Obama's administration, Trump and his team appear to be heading on a collision course with China.

US-China relations, already frosty over the disputed South China Sea islands, became more strained after Trump’s phone conversation with Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen, which immediately followed the Republican’s victory. The exchange infuriated Beijing, who considered it running against the bilateral protocol of the so-called 'One-China' policy, under which Washington views Taiwan as part of China.

And just over the last two weeks, both Trump and James Mattis, the current US Secretary of Defense, vowed to protect Japan in any territorial disputes it has with China in the East China Sea.

The situation has been further exacerbated by China’s militarization of the South China Sea. Chinese State media Xinhua announced on Friday that China's Navy had completed a week-long exercise there. The “scheduled” maneuvers entailed sudden attack drills and had three Chinese warships participating, including a destroyer.

https://www.rt.com/news/377841-us-carrier-china-sea-patrols/
 
. .
Will be interesting to see America's conflict with a power of considerable military strength
 
. . . . .
Except U.S directly to WAR with China, sending the US A.C group do nothing to stop Chinese building in SCS ... according to recent satellite photos showed Four artificial islands built by China, the only way is to bomb them, but such way of war will lead to Sino-U.S hot war, i do believe American strategy think-tanks in Washington already evaluated & understanded the risk of war with China which is World 2nd economy & 1.3 billion ppl & Top5 Nuclear Power & Independent military industrialization. If both find out the bigger risk after hot-war with each other, we can say war can stop the war. If not, we will see U.S-China war and U.S-Russia war.:lol:

Now other side U.S A.C group sailing in SCS, another side China continue finish building of four artificial islands in SCS, there both doing their jobs ... so PEACE~!:coffee: The probability of war between U.S & Russia & China is much less than U.S/Russia/China war with others, don't dream !!! :angel: The world new balance after WWII isn't easily broken by any American / Russian /Chinese.
 
Last edited:
.
Show of Force? or bullying? Americans are playing with fire. & we all know what can happen when the fire gets out of control.

Meiguo da buliao zhongguo.:china: you ke neng Zhongguo hui Ba Meiguo , xia pao. xiwang mei you dazhan.


Bajistan hui gen zhongguo xiongdi men yiqi.:pakistan: zhu zhongguo Anquan.:sniper:
 
.
the Chinese again with warning and repeated empty phrase "we have undisputed bla bla over ...".

Interesting development. Is it not the first time Carl Vincent operates in the South China Sea? That means 3 US carriers are present in the western pacific.
 
.
the Chinese again with warning and repeated empty phrase "we have undisputed bla bla over ...".

Interesting development. Is it not the first time Carl Vincent operates in the South China Sea? That means 3 US carriers are present in the western pacific.
lets just hope. it doesn't come to , China sinking one of them. just to prove they are serious.
 
. . . .
easy to say ... the amount of fire power each cbg is far greater compared to chinese CBG..
you make a mistake my friend. who says its a CBG to CBG clash? there are weapons which can take out a carrier specifically without endangering navy personal. or naval assets. but that would spark all out war. i just hope it does not come to that.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom