Original Article is in urdu. Anyone can Translate the webpage in english and read it. Eye opening account of How Our officers and soldiers were killed by Indian artillery during withdrawl phase or when they attacked indian posts without artillery support from Pak Army
اÙÚÛا اÙر Ù¾Ø§Ú©Ø³ØªØ§Ù Ú©Û Ø¯Ø±ÙÛا٠ÛÛ Ø¬ÙÚ¯ ÙØ¦Û Ø³Û Ø¬ÙÙØ§Ø¦Û 1999 Ú©Û Ø¯Ø±ÙÛا٠Ùائ٠آ٠کÙٹرÙÙ Ú©Û Ø³Ø§ØªÚ¾ اÙÚÛا Ú©Û Ø²Ûر٠اÙتظا٠کشÙÛر Ú©Û Ø¹ÙاÙÛ Ú©Ø§Ø±Ú¯Ù Ø§Ùر اس Ø³Û Ùتص٠برÙاÙÛ ÚÙÙ¹ÛÙÚº پر ÙÚÛ Ú¯Ø¦ÛÛ Ø§ÙÚÛا ÙÛÚº Ø§Ø³Û 'آپرÛØ´Ù ÙجÛ' جبکÛ...
www.bbc.com
In ancient times, a general was called Strategos, that equates to a general.
This is where the word Strategy is derived from.
A general's responsibility is to formulate and own the strategy as well as overlook it's execution;
without going into tactical details, which are let to be implemented by field level officers i.e a
brigadier and below.
Kargil, where on one hand talks of bravery in the face of extra ordinary firepower and odds;
at the same time it paints a very sad picture of strategical short shortsightedness, rather
complete lack of it.
some thing our generals have struggled with before, and are struggling with to this day;
and they will continue failing until such time that they begin to formulate strategy on their
own and develop independent thinking culture within the lower ranks, as well as higher ranks.
Regards.
PS: for those who will come back and say, political gov did this, and that, Fact of the matter is the nature and capability of the political government was known before hand, thus lack of risk mitigation is a fault at the general's level.
Same holds true for air force's lack of knowledge and them being out of sync.