What's new

UN wants consensual sex decriminalised in Pakistan

.
You brought up Zakir Naik. Zakir Naik says that partition was wrong.

I disagree with him. Partition was the right thing to do.

Anyways who knows parliamentary democracy knows the Non-Muslims would have the upper hand in a one-man one vote system.
Yes we know thats why we prefer to disown all those who believe partition was wrong it was 100% right but to control a population like ours we need a strong dictator like Ayub Khan who can give a middle finger to all religious fundos and ethno nationalists
 
.
Yes we know thats why we prefer to disown all those who believe partition was wrong it was 100% right but to control a population like ours we need a strong dictator like Ayub Khan who can give a middle finger to all religious fundos and ethno nationalists
Anyone who knows parliamentary democracy knows that in a one-man one-vote system the Hindus would win.

Look what is happening now in India. The BJP party is winning all across India.

Partition was the only way to solve the communal problem.
 
.
That's all u can come up with.
And Pan-Islamism is an Islamic concept, stated by the Holy Prophet (SAW) himeslf. You don't believe in it, go declare yourself as a non-Muslim. Being Pan-Islamic doesn't mean that one has to stop loving his country. And nationalism, well that's the last refuge of a scoundrel.
Taliban were honest patriotic Afghans who brought peace and stability to their country.

TTP or LEJ are terrorists, since you brought their sect, you should be declaring the deobandi scholars who gave fatwas against them as anti-Pakistan as well.
Not even ISIS follows pan Islamism even they prefer Arabs over non arabs :D
Taliban were honest patriotic Afghans depends on your definition and ethnicity but to us in the starting years they were good as they furthered our agenda now they are of no use to us
 
. .
While I am all in for personal freedom it's a bit of a shame that the UN is out giving us moral lessons and telling us to adjust according to their own standards. Who are they to do this ? I'm not going to the throw the Palestine/Kashmir fit but it's quite simple would the UN allow polygamy in western countries (degenerate concept but still) ? It doesn't harm anyone else and both parties are consenting to such an agreement so by banning it are they not denying human rights ?

And good job to OP for clickbait titles as always, don't know why the mods tolerate this fake news bs but oh well.
 
.
Surah Isra Ayat 32
وَلَا تَقۡرَبُوۡا الزِّنٰٓى اِنَّهٗ كَانَ فَاحِشَةً ؕ وَّسَآءَ سَبِيۡلاً‏ ﴿۳۲
اور زنا کے بھی پاس نہ جانا کہ وہ بےحیائی اور بری راہ ہے ﴿۳۲
  • And do not come near to adultery, it is a shameful deed and an evil, and opening the road to other evils.
Surah Noor Ayat 2
نِيَةُ وَالزَّانِىۡ فَاجۡلِدُوۡا كُلَّ وَاحِدٍ مِّنۡهُمَا مِائَةَ جَلۡدَةٍ‌
وَّلَا تَاۡخُذۡكُمۡ بِهِمَا رَاۡفَةٌ فِىۡ دِيۡنِ اللّٰهِ اِنۡ كُنۡتُمۡ تُؤۡمِنُوۡنَ بِاللّٰهِ وَالۡيَوۡمِ الۡاٰخِرِ‌ۚ وَلۡيَشۡهَدۡ عَذَابَهُمَا طَآٮِٕفَةٌ مِّنَ الۡمُؤۡمِنِيۡنَ‏ ﴿۲

بدکاری کرنے والی عورت اور بدکاری کرنے والا مرد (جب ان کی بدکاری ثابت ہوجائے تو) دونوں میں سے ہر ایک کو سو درے مارو۔ اور اگر تم خدا اور روز آخرت پر ایمان رکھتے ہو تو شرع خدا (کے حکم) میں تمہیں ان پر ہرگز ترس نہ آئے۔ اور چاہیئے کہ ان کی سزا کے وقت مسلمانوں کی ایک جماعت بھی موجود ہو ﴿۲
  • To the woman and the man guilty of illegal sexual relationship, flog each of them with one hundred stripes: let not compassion withhold you in their case, in a matter of punishment prescribed by Allah, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the believers witness their punishment.

Book No.17, pertaining to Punishments prescribed by Islam

In Sahih Muslim

Hadis No. 4194

'Abdullah b. 'Abbas reported that 'Umar b. Khattab sat on the pulpit of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: Verily Allah sent Muhammad (may peace be upon him) with truth and He sent down the Book upon him, and the verse of stoning was included in what was sent down to him. We recited it, retained it in our memory and understood it. Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) awarded the punishment of stoning to death (to the married adulterer and adulteress) and, after him, we also awarded the punishment of stoning, I am afraid that with the lapse of time, the people (may forget it) and may say: We do not find the punishment of stoning in the Book of Allah, and thus go astray by abandoning this duty prescribed by Allah. Stoning is a duty laid down in Allah's Book for married men and women who commit adultery when proof is established, or it there is pregnancy, or a confession.
Heck even touching a woman is Prohibited.
There is no doubt that this is an act of zina[fornication], because the Prophet salAllahu alayhi wa sallam said, “The eyes may commit zina, the hands may commit zina, the feet may commit zina and the private parts may commit zina.”
[Imam Ahmad, 1/412; see also Saheeh al-Jami’, 4921]

Is there anyone more pure in heart than Muhammad salAllahu alayhi wa sallam? Yet still he said,
“I do not shake hands with women.”
[Imam Ahmad, 6/357; see also Saheeh al-Jami’, 7054, and al-Isaabah, 4/354, Dar al-Kitab al-’Arabi edition]

There is nothing left to debate on that topic,that's a very clear verdict,any human can commit sin,but that can be only once or twice,after that it's a planned crime.

 
.
nobody takes UN seriously and if UN is soo serious then it should implement all those security resolutions that has been passed in case of Palestinian and Kashmir issues
 
. .
Zina is haram and so punishable under the law. Pakistan is an Islamic republic even if it stands with the name only and not in its true spirit. We are not a secular republic.
 
. .
useless UN, puppet govt should not do that. if they did pmln will be finished and Things worse than Faizabad dharna might happen. f pmln
then whats next UN is gonna ask for gay rights while People die in wars?
 
Last edited:
.
Weird resolution IMO. This already happens in every major city. But ranting on about this resolution will give our people at the U.N. something to do.
 
.
Londee can never be an Islamic concept, in the sense ..... that it existed already and wasn't introduced by Islam. Islam tried abolishing it, but thanks to the perverts .... they latter invented hear say and brought it back.

well any scripture is subject to interpretation but i can understand why you do not want the londee status for muslim women

Unfortunately, some people want to give up and go "their own way" (@Metanoia @El Sidd ), but are we that weak that we will abandon the battle field and let the enemy win without a fight? I hope not.

for me its over
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom