Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Musharraf aide calls UN's Bhutto report 'lies'
By MUNIR AHMED Associated Press Writer
Posted: 04/16/2010 01:20:34 AM PDT
Updated: 04/16/2010 01:43:51 AM PDT
ISLAMABADA U.N. report on the assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto is a "pack of lies" that wrongly implicates ex-President Pervez Musharraf and Pakistan's security forces for not stopping her killing, an aide to Musharraf said Friday.
Bhutto was killed in a Dec. 27, 2007, gun and suicide-bomb attack as she was leaving a rally in Rawalpindi city, where she was campaigning to return her Pakistan People's Party to power in elections after returning from nearly nine years in self-imposed exile.
The three-member U.N. panel said her death could have been avoided if Musharraf's government and various security agencies had taken adequate measures. It also found that the probe into her death was deliberately hampered by intelligence agencies and other officials.
The report, released Thursday, was hailed by the PPP, which now governs Pakistan and is headed by President Asif Ali Zardari, Bhutto's widower. Presidential spokesman Farhatullah Babar said the report backed up the People's Party's belief that Musharraf or his allies were responsible for Bhutto's death.
But Rashid Qureshi, a Musharraf aide, insisted that the U.N. report was based on rumors and that Musharraf was in no way responsible.
"This chief U.N. investigator was not the relative of Sherlock Homes," Qureshi said, noting that Musharraf himself had been the target of suicide attackers.
The head of the country's most powerful spy agency, Inter-Services
Intelligence, warned Bhutto not to attend the rally because of looming threats of an attack, Qureshi said.
"But Benazir Bhutto and her chief security officer Rehman Malik decided to go ahead with their planned election rally," Qureshi said. "It was Benazir Bhutto who exposed herself to the attacker."
Chor ki darhi mein tinka... who said Musharraf was responsible? The report said 'Musharraf government' and it said 'Musharraf Government' because it was him and only him who was running the government.But Rashid Qureshi, a Musharraf aide, insisted that the UN report was based on rumors and that Musharraf was in no way responsible.
“This chief UN investigator was not the relative of Sherlock Homes,” Qureshi said, noting that Musharraf himself had been the target of suicide attackers.
You forgot to include the assassination of Mr. Liaquat Ali Khan. In all the above mentioned cases, intelligence was either flawed or the agencies responsible for the security failed to appreciate the gravity of the threat as proposed or informed by the intelligence agencies. Mind you that all above mentioned cases were one of their kind and similar examples had not existed before the actual incidences.Take history, Kennedy assassination & his brothers, Regan assassination attempt, Pope's assassination attempt, Gandhi family members assassinations, Sri Lankan leaders assassination attempts etc etc etc, in all the assassination to some extend or fully succeeded, even though top of the line intelligence or security was provided, but when you expose yourself, you are in the assassins sights, from there fate takes over, either you die or you are saved.
No one made this argument when Mr. Liaquat Ali Khan was assassinated, you know why? Benazir was a leader just like Mr. Liaquat Ali Khan, and unlike a coward usurper General, she had to mingle with her supporters/voters as that is exactly what is expected from the Political leaders. Now it was the responsibility of the government to provide her with a safe and secure atmosphere or have told her in written clearly that she must avoid such contacts otherwise the government would not be responsible for something unfortunate. Did Musharraf regime give her or her security advisors any such warning based on intelligence reports in writing?If Bhutto hadn't shown herself out of the vehicle, things would have been different and she may had been alive.
This report or any other report following this will remain inconclusive because all the evidences were already destroyed soon after the assassination of the Benazir and those who destroyed the evidence were never prosecuted as to why and under whose orders they did that. The responsibility of destroying the evidence does not go to the present regime but to the able regime of former dictator Perwaiz Musharraf.I would add though that this report is bias but not because of UN staff but because the investigation started after a year and because PPPP has its own people in key position.
Any report that will be prepared by any agency, national or international will include the questions on the destruction of the evidence and as a consequence, every report will be bias and unacceptable for the former dictator's supporters.