What's new

UN court ruling puts future of strategic US military base Diego Garcia into question

.
Last edited:
. .
Mau... er what tius? We are just here, ask them to take back the islands, as long as they can land on, we will return it, okay?
 
.
All major powers somehow break the international laws in past, there is nothing special about it, and USA also deny/break their own laws to give Bikini Atolls to the natives people
 
. . .
I’m noticing a coordinated effort of attack throughout the forum. It is definitely coordinated.
 
.
Then what makes US and western had the right to call on China?
As a reminder US don't stand on good moral ground to condemn others where it refused to return Diego Garcia Island that is located the opposite side of the earth. If Diego Garcia Island if located at South US Sea then it stand a ground for argument. Unfortunately South US Sea does not exist. Beside USA is a land that don't belong to them it was stolen from Native American. That is why the gene that embraces lying, stealing and cheating still being preached by repectful Mike Pompeo. "THOU SHALL NOT STEAL" Even basic value phrases is hard for USA to understand and yet without shame they want to be world moral judge.
 
.
I’m noticing a coordinated effort of attack throughout the forum. It is definitely coordinated.

Maybe, maybe not. It happens from all sides but what I am interested in & what to know your view is that "does the above news having any truth in it? Is it so as it says in the CNN report or not?" If it is, then how come sharing a news report i.e legit as well becomes a coordinated effort of attack?
 
. .
I’m noticing a coordinated effort of attack throughout the forum. It is definitely coordinated.

they are paid to do it

best part is its not working and they are only making more enemies
 
.
I’m noticing a coordinated effort of attack throughout the forum. It is definitely coordinated.

Does it change the fact that those islands are occupied and US won't return them even though international law and court rulings ask it to do so ?? Isn't occupying some ones islands a symbol of colonialism ?
 
Last edited:
.
International Arbitration Tribunal is NOT a part of UN and therefore its ruling is not enforceable nor recognized. It is just an opinion.
It is attended, its judges selected and paid for by one party and that is Philippines and what arbitration are they talking about?

International Law??? Certainly NOT.

Philippines have filed their case with ICJ a UN body but it was rejected as Philippines has a weak case.
They can't even prove ownership apart from UNCLOS 200 nautical miles albeit Philippines has also voluntarily signed the exceptional clause.

This is unlike the Pedra Branca dispute between Singapore and Malaysia or Sipadan dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia. These are enforceable and is legally recognized.

Philippines did tried very hard to file itself as a claimant in Sipadan case but was once again rejected by ICJ and Sipadan was awarded to Malaysia.

So to all the trolls that keep mentioning South China Sea, stick to facts.
 
Last edited:
.
Dutch, Portuguese and English found Indon islands!

The Chinese found south china sea island first, in the south china sea.
Your argument is a little bit not Intelligent.

The British also claimed Tasmania Island Australia and Penang Island Malaysia is found by Captain Francis Light. Does that means the island no native people?

Then today any countries that landed warship anywhere on earth can claimed they found the place?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom