What's new

UK's 'most powerful ship' to lead fleet into troubled Pacific

Today's scenario is totally different from the age of iron curtain, the whole west united against Soviet with real passion, not lip service.
Secondly, the PLAN was almost insignificant just twenty years ago, which is only two decades, speaking of naval build up.

another fanboy wet dream

JMSDF has 2 x Izumo Class + 2 x Hyuga Class + 3 x Osumi Class thats enough assets to hold down the Chinese amphibious warships, plus the JMSDF warships are off course much better quality and the sailors are one of the most professional in the World we call them squared away, Chinese are far from being squared away

South Korea 2 x LHD + RAN 2 x LHD = 4 more LHD

India can cover the PLAN Carriers, and this is why I never compare China to USN because its not even a comparison not even worth a comparison a single Nimitz Class can carry 96 x fighters in Surge mode and could wipe 3 x Chinese Carriers from the map before the Chinese even know whats hit them

the Royal Navy sending its assets is just icing on the cake
 
.
another fanboy wet dream

JMSDF has 2 x Izumo Class + 2 x Hyuga Class + 3 x Osumi Class thats enough assets to hold down the Chinese amphibious warships, plus the JMSDF warships are off course much better quality and the sailors are one of the most professional in the World we call them squared away, Chinese are far from being squared away

South Korea 2 x LHD + RAN 2 x LHD = 4 more LHD

India can cover the PLAN Carriers, and this is why I never compare China to USN because its not even a comparison not even worth a comparison a single Nimitz Class can carry 96 x fighters in Surge mode and could wipe 3 x Chinese Carriers from the map before the Chinese even know whats hit them

the Royal Navy sending its assets is just icing on the cake
Turn right and you will find your comrade Mr. MMM-E in Turkish section, Mr think tank.
 
.
very poor excuse

its from years ago and from a ship which was not even commissioned

shows how amateur Chinese are, you have no clue about naval matters, you will be very easy to beat in war if you think this video shows the craftsmanship of UK shipbuilding

everyone has leaks and mi-haps not big deal
What an excuse. There is no such thing called every one has leaks and mis haps. Maybe for UK low quality shipbuilding. This is not common and Chinese CV-17 carrier do not have such nonsense.

Once again prove the low quality shipbuilding of Royal Navy.
Another fake Pakistani profile with Chinese ID
@waz @PakSword @LeGenD

Another blind attack on members for their nationality. He need to be warned.
 
.
Yes but China does not have the UK's quality.

J-15 on the Chinese carriers cannot take on the UK's F-35Bs.

Type-093B cannot take on the Astute SSN.

It wont be UK alone but USA, Japan and Australia also at least and so when you combine all these together, PLAN will be going to the bottom of the Pacific and S China sea very quickly.
F-35 is extremely short legged. If it's goes stealth mode. It cannot carry WVRAAM missile outside. There are so many limitation of F-35 as carrier fighter of payload and range. Even the stealth is questionable.

J-15 is a far larger carrier wing and carry bigger, more powerful radar with longer range.
 
. .
Are they coming back with another company?
Yes, The East China company.
.


HMS Queen Elizabeth and her sister ship are attracting a lot of attention and one of the most common questions is, why does she have two islands?

Instead of a traditional single island, the carrier has two smaller islands. The forward island is for ship control functions and the aft (FLYCO) island is for flying control.

The reason for two islands is, simply put, due to the gas turbine exhausts. The design would have either had two small islands or one large, long island. The two smaller islands were chosen. The location and alignment of the islands are based around the 2.4 metre diameter gas turbine exhausts which were pre-fitted in the island and below in the ship superstructure.

Advantages of the two island configuration are increased flight deck area, reduced air turbulence over the flight deck and increased flexibility of space allocation in the lower decks. The flight control centre in the aft island is in the optimum position for control of the critical aircraft approach and deck landings.

According to the manufacturers, the Aircraft Carrier Alliance, the benefits are significant:

“The Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers are the first carriers to incorporate a twin island design, which separates the running of the ship from the flying operations resulting in greater visibility of operations and increases survivability. There are live communication links between the two islands however to allow them to work together.

The advantages of the unique design include the more efficient use of space across the flight deck, hangar and lifts, as well as the reduction in air turbulence over the flight deck. The twin island design also reflects design improvements further below deck, including the decision to separate power generation machinery in order to increase survivability.

There are two sets of power propulsion systems (a gas turbine and two diesel engines), located in different areas of the ship separated by watertight doors. This means there are also two exhaust stacks, one forward and one aft, which are masked within the twin islands. Survivability is increased further by the islands being designed with the capability to assume each other’s role in an emergency.”


The Queen Elizabeth class mark a change from expressing carrier power in terms of number of aircraft carried, to the number of sorties that can be generated from the deck. The class are not the largest class of carrier in the world but they are most likely the smallest and least expensive carrier the Royal Navy could build which still have the advantages that large carriers offer.
 
.
These nails will make rust buckets out of those fanbois wet dreams. :cry: :enjoy:

df-26-launchers.4ad6fa.jpg
 
.
Yes but China does not have the UK's quality.

J-15 on the Chinese carriers cannot take on the UK's F-35Bs.

Type-093B cannot take on the Astute SSN.

It wont be UK alone but USA, Japan and Australia also at least and so when you combine all these together, PLAN will be going to the bottom of the Pacific and S China sea very quickly.

There is some delusional Anglo fanboys on this forum, none more delusional than this dude right here.

And yes, the CPC will continue to ruthlessly crush any terrorist in Xinjiang without any mercy. Not a damn thing you can do about it.

CPC will not tolerate any religious fanatics from any religion on its soil and allow China to be a playground for religious nutters like many Middle East and South Asian nations.
 
Last edited:
.
Let us have this conversation when China is there and I am not even sure I will be alive then.

It is still maybe 3 decades away from being able to push the USN back to Hawaii.

Japan may decide to double its GDP spend on defence and spend all the extra money on its already powerful Navy.

Australia is building a potent Navy based on UK frigate tech and French sub tech.

UK will have by the end of this decade 2 fully-equipped 70,000 tonne aircraft carriers with 80-100 F-35Bs on them. These F-35Bs will likely be replaced by the 6th gen Tempest fighter now in development in the 2040s.

PLAN is not the only one that is building up its military power. Yes PLAN is already pretty powerful and will get even more so, but the USN and its allies will still stay comfortably more powerful even by mid-century.

woah there. Let them put a single domestic F-35B on their carrier first.

then the whole idea of a 'potent' navy based on imported tech. lmao. ok.

I guess Bengalis are Indian to the core after all.
 
.
There is some delusional Anglo fanboys on this forum, none more delusional than this dude right here.
He even claim leak and quality for shipbuilding is acceptable for UK warships :lol:

See how desperate these people find excuse to boast their ego only. Next time, they will claim crashed of dozen fighter jet and killing pilots per year are ok too. Very common and no need to worry for UK. :enjoy:
 
.
Mark my words. China's navy will one day be doing regular FONOPS through the English channel. Give it 10 years.

Wouldn’t be surprised if the Chinese built nuclear powered destroyers/cruisers to do FONOPS in all the world’s oceans.

A fleet of nuclear powered Chinese Zumwalts
 
. . .
Wherever the Opium Axis goes there is trouble. What an odd coincidence. 🙄
 
.
This is an pure example of flag displaying and naval diplomacy.

The UK is politically diverging from the EU on many issues and we will see the effects of this more clearly in the coming years.

Also, seeing this movement as a direct anti-Chinese act is,an extremely superficial perspective, IMO.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom