UK scientists create human sperm for the first time

[fhassan]

UK scientists create human sperm for the first time​

What is the big deal?

I've been making human sperm for decades.

 

[xebex]

Oh well, we can make it much cost effectively than some mumbo jumbo scientific lab scientist can. anywhere anytime. beat that!!!!

 

[Rajkumar]

Rajkumar are you trying to tell us something here about you man?
(i.e Master of your own domain)

That is just too much information on your part.

well,
i can paste articles here to prove my point but that it is very common and true but it would derail the thread and you know i am right.

 

[amarnath]

What is the big deal?

I've been making human sperm for decades.

Ahahahahahaha good one...lol... yeah, whats the big deal....lol

 

[duhastmish]

ahhm !! raj i hope you are not saying you got a big hand in wastign those sperms. I hope you are not tryign to say you make more than anyboyd else here.
Ugly men make more sperm during sex, study suggests

WOMEN wanting to get pregnant should find themselves an ugly man, new research suggests.

Scientists have found attractive males produce less sperm during sex.

Researchers think good-looking males are biologically geared to hold back their sperm in each encounter to increase their chance of impregnating more females.

But unattractive males know they are not going to bed so many females - so when they do get lucky they give it all they've got.

The findings from the University of Oxford and University College London are backed up by studies of chickens and fish, but researchers think they could well apply to humans too.

"Human attractiveness is complicated and influenced by a number of factors including cultural preferences," said UCL researcher Sam Tazzyman.

"Nonetheless, ejaculate size and sperm quality are likely to have been moulded by similar forces, like attractiveness and the number of sexual partners, that are important in other species."

Reporting the findings on the university's website he said: "The more attractive a male is, the more females will be willing to mate with him, reducing the value of each mating to him. This means it is optimal for him to contribute fewer sperm per mating."

"Although this reduces fertility per mating, it maximises the number of offspring he sires overall.

"Less attractive males secure fewer matings but value each of them more highly, and by allocating more sperm to each mating make the most of their meagre opportunities.

"This leads to the rather paradoxical prediction that matings with attractive males may be less fertile than those with unattractive males."

--------------------

I have one question: Who the heck had the job to count them ?????

 

[Rajkumar]

ahhm !! raj i hope you are not saying you got a big hand in wastign those sperms. I hope you are not tryign to say you make more than anyboyd else here.
Ugly men make more sperm during sex, study suggests

WOMEN wanting to get pregnant should find themselves an ugly man, new research suggests.

Scientists have found attractive males produce less sperm during sex.

Researchers think good-looking males are biologically geared to hold back their sperm in each encounter to increase their chance of impregnating more females.

But unattractive males know they are not going to bed so many females - so when they do get lucky they give it all they've got.

The findings from the University of Oxford and University College London are backed up by studies of chickens and fish, but researchers think they could well apply to humans too.

"Human attractiveness is complicated and influenced by a number of factors including cultural preferences," said UCL researcher Sam Tazzyman.

"Nonetheless, ejaculate size and sperm quality are likely to have been moulded by similar forces, like attractiveness and the number of sexual partners, that are important in other species."

Reporting the findings on the university's website he said: "The more attractive a male is, the more females will be willing to mate with him, reducing the value of each mating to him. This means it is optimal for him to contribute fewer sperm per mating."

"Although this reduces fertility per mating, it maximises the number of offspring he sires overall.

"Less attractive males secure fewer matings but value each of them more highly, and by allocating more sperm to each mating make the most of their meagre opportunities.

"This leads to the rather paradoxical prediction that matings with attractive males may be less fertile than those with unattractive males."

--------------------

I have one question: Who the heck had the job to count them ?????

i certainly don't claim that.
that's pretty interesting read and logical explanation about physical behavior. it seems all right. these medical surveys shows scientific side but we need to look at current trend of behavior of men. why do you think the business of Viagra keep on expanding?
preferences of men are changing, its not about sperm count, its about stamina. impressing women in bed has become top priorities now these days . premarital affairs and late marriages improved the chances of man's involvement in sexual affairs and that's why man tend to think more about partners satisfaction to prove their dominance in competitive world.
i think that ugly men theory works but theory about handsome doesn't seem logical to me. if handsome man is in act why the hell would he think about saving instead he will be totally concentrated on pleasure. if the experience for him is really good he would go for repetitive action

 

[duhastmish]

i certainly don't claim that.
that's pretty interesting read and logical explanation about physical behavior. it seems all right. these medical surveys shows scientific side but we need to look at current trend of behavior of men. why do you think the business of Viagra keep on expanding?
preferences of men are changing, its not about sperm count, its about stamina. impressing women in bed has become top priorities now these days . premarital affairs and late marriages improved the chances of man's involvement in sexual affairs and that's why man tend to think more about partners satisfaction to prove their dominance in competitive world.
i think that ugly men theory works but theory about handsome doesn't seem logical to me. if handsome man is in act why the hell would he think about saving instead he will be totally concentrated on pleasure. if the experience for him is really good he would go for repetitive action

Alfa male like me dont care much of all this. loooool but may be thats why - i am almost infertile man because i am so friggin good looking ay ???

but friggin irony is : Do these poms have to pay their tax for these kind of garbage ?? scientific research ?

But al lthe female members lets have a voting here: WHo wants an ugly baby though? Or - who wants to have sex with an ugly man? Sorry, but that's the reality here mate!

Like a friggin shytty hollywood movie - finelly all goes good with an ugly guy gettign the chick .

and obviously the head scientist must be frrrking ugly ay ?

 

[NEHA]

Reference....

 

[xebex]

Reference....

Reference what??.....reference for "ugly man-handsome man" thoery?here u go mam....

Study: Ugly Men More Fertile, Produce More Sperm During Sex - Men's Health - FOXNews.com

 

[Hyde]

so is that also mean, If women is not having a baby from her partner and all is good with the women, She can use this technology and have a baby?

Is That means you do not need a man to have a baby? Just want to confirm

and when is this technology going to be introduced in a market there are many womens who does not have a baby, they may want to try it