UK reopens its Iran embassy as relations warm

[C130]

Can someone who gives a weapon to a murder (while he knows what's going to happen) say I had no role??? what if that murder is going to kill thousands of innocent people?
West and specially U.K are joint in wahhabi sh!t.

and shiite isn't sh!t as well??

 

[mohsen]

and shiite isn't sh!t as well??

why? because we teach our children to fight against kid killer Zionists?

then with your logic, U.S is the biggest child abuser:

teaching hate to your children:
Scouts Train to Fight Terrorists, and More

 

[C130]

why? because we teach our children to fight against kid killer Zionists?

then with your logic, U.S is the biggest child abuser:

teaching hate to your children:
Scouts Train to Fight Terrorists, and More

this is normal


crazy hezzy

 

[mohsen]

this is normal


crazy hezzy

wanna know about crazy things in Palestine?
448 children killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza, UN says | The Electronic Intifada

wanna see the craziest pictures? I can't even post them here:
Child-killing sociopaths of Israel | Veterans Today

 

[C130]

wanna know about crazy things in Palestine?
448 children killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza, UN says | The Electronic Intifada

wanna see the craziest pictures? I can't even post them here:
Child-killing sociopaths of Israel | Veterans Today

dressing your babies up like soldiers and filling their minds with murderous hateful intentions.

do you know who Gandhi is???


peace/love win out in the end.

 

[mohsen]

dressing your babies up like soldiers and filling their minds with murderous hateful intentions.

do you know who Gandhi is???


peace/love win out in the end.

Peace? while Zionists are occupying their land, destroying their home and farms? any objection is answered with hot bullets and latest American made destructive bombs. seems like a complete plan.

How about we do the same thing to Americans? after that if you like we can talk about Gandhi's theories.

since the occupation of Palestine all peace talks has ended up with more occupation and destruction.
Is that the goal of peace talks? yes, but for Israelis.

do you know who Arafat is?
Peace without justice failed miserabely.

 

[AmirPatriot]

I think expanding economic ties with Britain is a good thing. Why? Well. Having lived in the UK for a number of years I've observed that the politicians are relatively moderate and anti-confrontational. Note how British politicians voted against bombing Syria in the Chemical weapons saga and took years to start bombing ISIS. They are also very open to friendly relations with most countries.

Through diplomacy Iran could get Britain on our side in the problem of supplying weapons to Saudi. There's already been a fair amount of debate and outcry in the UK over the supply of weapons to the Saudis, who have been labelled as horibble human rights abusers and those who bomb civilians in Yemen. With better relations with Iran and some diplomatic encouragement I feel confident that most, if not all arms sales to Saudi from Britain could be halted.

It's very true that Britain has a lot of things that could interest Iran. Jet engine tech being notable (Rolls Royce makes excellent jet engines).

 

[mohsen]

I think expanding economic ties with Britain is a good thing. Why? Well. Having lived in the UK for a number of years I've observed that the politicians are relatively moderate and anti-confrontational. Note how British politicians voted against bombing Syria in the Chemical weapons saga and took years to start bombing ISIS. They are also very open to friendly relations with most countries.

Through diplomacy Iran could get Britain on our side in the problem of supplying weapons to Saudi. There's already been a fair amount of debate and outcry in the UK over the supply of weapons to the Saudis, who have been labelled as horibble human rights abusers and those who bomb civilians in Yemen. With better relations with Iran and some diplomatic encouragement I feel confident that most, if not all arms sales to Saudi from Britain could be halted.

It's very true that Britain has a lot of things that could interest Iran. Jet engine tech being notable (Rolls Royce makes excellent jet engines).

Britain had the key role for buying the Saudi monarchies a chair in the human rights council. what you said is also another sign that Britain foreign policies is being decided out of those debates, and of course nothing else is expected from a monarchy.


بازخوانی یک پرونده جنجالی به روایت گاردین
نقش انگلیس در عضویت عربستان در شورای حقوق بشر سازمان ملل/ دلار سعودی و سیاست انگلیسی، حقوق بشر می‌فروشد

 

[ResurgentIran]

Britain had the key role for buying the Saudi monarchies a chair in the human rights council. what you said is also another sign that Britain foreign policies is being decided out of those debates, and of course nothing else is expected from a monarchy.


بازخوانی یک پرونده جنجالی به روایت گاردین
نقش انگلیس در عضویت عربستان در شورای حقوق بشر سازمان ملل/ دلار سعودی و سیاست انگلیسی، حقوق بشر می‌فروشد

My friend, we have enough tensions on our plate. We can not be antagonistic against the entire world.
If a country wishes to seek better relations with Iran, we should welcome it

Peace? while Zionists are occupying their land, destroying their home and farms? any objection is answered with hot bullets and latest American made destructive bombs. seems like a complete plan.

How about we do the same thing to Americans? after that if you like we can talk about Gandhi's theories.

since the occupation of Palestine all peace talks has ended up with more occupation and destruction.
Is that the goal of peace talks? yes, but for Israelis.

do you know who Arafat is?
Peace without justice failed miserabely.

I dont want to sound cold, but why should we really care about Palestine so much? Yeah its sad that jews are raping their country, but we can not let israel/palestine conflict determine our relations with other countries.
Let palestinians and israelis live in their perpetual state of conflict. I honestly dont care anymore.

 

[AmirPatriot]

Britain had the key role for buying the Saudi monarchies a chair in the human rights council. what you said is also another sign that Britain foreign policies is being decided out of those debates, and of course nothing else is expected from a monarchy.


بازخوانی یک پرونده جنجالی به روایت گاردین
نقش انگلیس در عضویت عربستان در شورای حقوق بشر سازمان ملل/ دلار سعودی و سیاست انگلیسی، حقوق بشر می‌فروشد

This is exactly the sort of behaviour I want improved relations with Britain to change.

My friend, we have enough tensions on our plate. We can not be antagonistic against the entire world.
If a country wishes to seek better relations with Iran, we should welcome it



I dont want to sound cold, but why should we really care about Palestine so much? Yeah its sad that jews are raping their country, but we can not let israel/palestine conflict determine our relations with other countries.
Let palestinians and israelis live in their perpetual state of conflict. I honestly dont care anymore.

Palestinians have one of the lowest opinions of Iran, despite what we have done for them. Remember how Hamas started condemning Assad?

I think we should just be cool towards them for now. Do the whole "Israel is oppressing Palestine" talk but if they are going to hate us so much then why bother. Just redirect resources to Hezbollah and the Houthis.

 

[ResurgentIran]

This is exactly the sort of behaviour I want improved relations with Britain to change.



Palestinians have one of the lowest opinions of Iran, despite what we have done for them. Remember how Hamas started condemning Assad?

I think we should just be cool towards them for now. Do the whole "Israel is oppressing Palestine" talk but if they are going to hate us so much then why bother. Just redirect resources to Hezbollah and the Houthis.

Honestly, this whole Palestine thing was just used by the IRI to gain reputation in the "Arab street"/public opinion.
But the situation in the region as it is now with all the sectarianism and Shia's and Sunni's slaughtering each other like animals, makes the Palestine card completely useless now.

So I agree with you. We should just cool it with that and wish that Iran adopts a more rational (instead of ideological) approach when it comes to that conflict, preferably just stay out of it altogether.

 

[Takaavar]

Rather a British embassy that a Saudi or Sudanese or Djibutiiieese embassy

 

[Hack-Hook]

Britain had the key role for buying the Saudi monarchies a chair in the human rights council. what you said is also another sign that Britain foreign policies is being decided out of those debates, and of course nothing else is expected from a monarchy.


بازخوانی یک پرونده جنجالی به روایت گاردین
نقش انگلیس در عضویت عربستان در شورای حقوق بشر سازمان ملل/ دلار سعودی و سیاست انگلیسی، حقوق بشر می‌فروشد

don't take it seriously, everybody knew what human right means in politic .

 

[yavar]

Iran has been at war with Britain for some time – it’s time that we took notice

When British troops were on patrol in Iraq and Afghanistan, we faced many enemies, from jihadis to press-ganged civilians. But he most terrifying ones lay buried. Bullets usually miss. Improvised explosive devices – IEDs — don’t. They are frighteningly simple. Old munitions wired together or plastic bottles packed with fertiliser and ball-bearings could destroy a vehicle and kill its passengers.

During the four years I served in Afghanistan, I saw IEDs evolve: first came remote triggers, then pressure plates and then low-metal-content devices. Curiously, IEDs evolved in a similar way in Iraq. This should be no surprise, since the groups trying to kill British troops shared one common resource: Iranian support.

For years, Tehran has armed insurgents. Through the Quds Force, the special forces unit of the regime’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, it has killed British troops and plotted to assassinate diplomats in Washington DC. The ayatollahs have nurtured terrorists around the world. Their war has never been declared, but has cost many lives.

Qassem Suleimani, the commander of the Quds Forces, has waged a secret war against Britain for years. Seeking to limit our options, his forces, Russian allies and Syrian and Hezbollah proxies, have slaughtered the more moderate Syrian rebels. What’s more, he is trying to split us from our allies. By smuggling weapons into Bahrain and Kuwait to encourage violence, he’s trying to force the Royal Navy from its principal base in the Persian Gulf.

Serving in the armed forces across the region, I learned how Iran spreads its malign influence. In Lebanon and Syria I saw how its Revolutionary Guard Corps supported fighters and shaped regional leaders. Today, we are watching Russia join Tehran in military adventurism in Syria — not just to secure Assad but to challenge our interests. And now they have won the end of sanctions in exchange for little more than a ten-year delay in nuclear production.

The recent nuclear deal sent a clear message to our allies: Iran is winning. For the first time since Egypt stopped receiving Russian support in 1970, the US is on the back foot and Moscow is back in – on the Shia side.

Yes, it was an American deal. Britain’s leverage was removed by the flood of businesses pushing to get around sanctions and the Obama administration’s determination to reach a deal. But to our allies among the Gulf countries, we are part of the group who pushed Iran hard for years – and then blinked.



Obama’s carried further than that of Britain in the negotiations over the Iran nuclear deal, but we cannot rely on Washington to ensure the agreement works. The deal should have banned acts of terror and subversion. It should have included a real end to the nuclear programme; it should have stopped Suleimani and his Quds Force undermining the positions of our allies.

If Iran falls short and seeks to use subterfuge to undermine our allies, we must stiffen America’s resolve. We had to do so before, when Margaret Thatcher ensured President George H.W. Bush defended Kuwait in 1990. We must be prepared to do so again.

Tom Tugendhat served with the British Army in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is now Conservative MP for Tonbridge and Malling. This is an abridged version of an article which first ran last October.

Iran has been at war with Britain for some time - it's time that we took notice - Spectator Blogs

 

[mohsen]

Iran has been at war with Britain for some time – it’s time that we took notice

When British troops were on patrol in Iraq and Afghanistan, we faced many enemies, from jihadis to press-ganged civilians. But he most terrifying ones lay buried. Bullets usually miss. Improvised explosive devices – IEDs — don’t. They are frighteningly simple. Old munitions wired together or plastic bottles packed with fertiliser and ball-bearings could destroy a vehicle and kill its passengers.

During the four years I served in Afghanistan, I saw IEDs evolve: first came remote triggers, then pressure plates and then low-metal-content devices. Curiously, IEDs evolved in a similar way in Iraq. This should be no surprise, since the groups trying to kill British troops shared one common resource: Iranian support.

For years, Tehran has armed insurgents. Through the Quds Force, the special forces unit of the regime’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, it has killed British troops and plotted to assassinate diplomats in Washington DC. The ayatollahs have nurtured terrorists around the world. Their war has never been declared, but has cost many lives.

Qassem Suleimani, the commander of the Quds Forces, has waged a secret war against Britain for years. Seeking to limit our options, his forces, Russian allies and Syrian and Hezbollah proxies, have slaughtered the more moderate Syrian rebels. What’s more, he is trying to split us from our allies. By smuggling weapons into Bahrain and Kuwait to encourage violence, he’s trying to force the Royal Navy from its principal base in the Persian Gulf.

Serving in the armed forces across the region, I learned how Iran spreads its malign influence. In Lebanon and Syria I saw how its Revolutionary Guard Corps supported fighters and shaped regional leaders. Today, we are watching Russia join Tehran in military adventurism in Syria — not just to secure Assad but to challenge our interests. And now they have won the end of sanctions in exchange for little more than a ten-year delay in nuclear production.

The recent nuclear deal sent a clear message to our allies: Iran is winning. For the first time since Egypt stopped receiving Russian support in 1970, the US is on the back foot and Moscow is back in – on the Shia side.

Yes, it was an American deal. Britain’s leverage was removed by the flood of businesses pushing to get around sanctions and the Obama administration’s determination to reach a deal. But to our allies among the Gulf countries, we are part of the group who pushed Iran hard for years – and then blinked.



Obama’s carried further than that of Britain in the negotiations over the Iran nuclear deal, but we cannot rely on Washington to ensure the agreement works. The deal should have banned acts of terror and subversion. It should have included a real end to the nuclear programme; it should have stopped Suleimani and his Quds Force undermining the positions of our allies.

If Iran falls short and seeks to use subterfuge to undermine our allies, we must stiffen America’s resolve. We had to do so before, when Margaret Thatcher ensured President George H.W. Bush defended Kuwait in 1990. We must be prepared to do so again.

Tom Tugendhat served with the British Army in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is now Conservative MP for Tonbridge and Malling. This is an abridged version of an article which first ran last October.

Iran has been at war with Britain for some time - it's time that we took notice - Spectator Blogs

I'm glad we have killed some terrorists from Britain monarchy.
This so called soldire doesn't know about killing 11 milion Iranian in the world War, the war which we had no role in it.