What's new

Uighur girls XInjiang street interview: " Would you like to marry out of Xinjiang?

And when did i put them on pedestal ? im just speaking the truth. White girls are different they are not like any other, they like it big , the bigger the better else they aint dating you. On top i call white girls as racist pigs.

They like Black men not because of the reason you mentioned, they have grown up with the Black idols related to hip hop music and cool image like Michael Jackson etc. I have noticed that Russian and Ukrainian girls like Pakistani, Indian and middle eastern men men for the same reason because they grew up watching bollywood movies during Soviet era, Mithun Chakarvarti still remains one of the most famous indian hero for them due to the success of Disco Dancer movie in Soviet union. It is all due to idol image caused by entertainment industry which in case of Western European and North American girls is the black men and in case of former Soviet union are south asian and middle eastern men.
 
Last edited:
.
White men have, statistically, the smallest penises. It's why they're all pedophiles and serial killers.

man i disagree. South Asians are the smallest.

They like Black men not because of the reason you mentioned, they have grown up with the Black idols related to hip hop music and gangster image like Mike Tyson, Michael Jackson and others. I have noticed that Russian and Ukrainian girls like Pakistani, Indian and middle eastern men men for the same reason because they grew up watching bollywood movies during Soviet era, Mithun Chakarvarti still remains one of the most famous indian hero for them due to the success of Disco Dancer movie in Soviet union. It is all due to idealization which in case of Western European and North American girls is the black men and in case of former Soviet union are south asian and middle eastern men.

Agree 50% . The western media has portrayed brown guys(south asians) as the bad guys while with all hip hop rnb culture and black lives matter + white girls with black guys in movies , songs ,series , commercials has been fed to them and thats how they think. But they like lebanese or arab guys even afghanis due to being much fair in complexion else they categorize u in the terrorist list who smell like curry lol .
 
.
man i disagree. South Asians are the smallest.



Agree 50% . The western media has portrayed brown guys(south asians) as the bad guys while with all hip hop rnb culture and black lives matter + white girls with black guys in movies , songs ,series , commercials has been fed to them and thats how they think. But they like lebanese or arab guys even afghanis due to being much fair in complexion else they categorize u in the terrorist list who smell like curry lol .

Sounds like you had very harsh experiences.
I think its wrong to generalize though.
 
.
wtf u mean nice try,cmon nnga i live in the west what you talk about is hell rare. The ones who marry asians are white women looking for easy money. Pull out the data most of the asian guys run business

sdt-2012-rise-of-intermarriage-49.png


Asian men who marry white women earn LESS than Asian men with Asian women. White women with Asian men earn over FIFTY PERCENT more than all other white women and are nearly twice as likely to be college educated. And they're younger.
 
. .
white girls with black guys in movies , songs ,series , commercials has been fed to them and thats how they think. But they like lebanese or arab guys even afghanis due to being much fair in complexion else they categorize u in the terrorist list who smell like curry lol .

I don't know but I feel you are an indian or afghani filled with inferiority complex pretending here to be Pakistani here, the highlighted sentence is a clear give away.

Sounds like you had very harsh experiences.
I think its wrong to generalize though.

He seems to be a false flagger to me possibly an indian or afghani trying to make "us pakistanis" believe that we are worthless like him :lol:.
 
.
As a "muhajir" you had no right to own a city by changing its demography or make a new province in Pakistan..
Tell me, who gave you the right to decide whether Mujahirs can own a city or not. If they can't own a city, neither can you. Sounds logical...Right!

It was the job of so-called Muhajirs to assimilate into present-day Pakistan not the other way around..
Don't you think that it is the job of both "Muhajirs" and the Punjabis, Pashtuns, Balochs etc to understand each other and learn each other's ways. Why is the onus only on Muhajirs to assimilate?

But it didnt happen completely.Your brothers who migrated to Punjab,KPK and Sindh assimilated and have no issues today,they dotn call themselves muhajir but urdu-speaking and they speak the local languages as well as Urdu very well and love their heritage regardless what Indian city they were from.And we Pakistanis have no problem with them.
Are Muhajirs not Pakistani enough? Which Pakistanis are you referring to here "And we Pakistanis have no problem with them"
 
.
Sounds like you had very harsh experiences.
I think its wrong to generalize though.

nop just speaking reality

I don't know but I feel you are an indian or afghani filled with inferiority complex pretending here to be Pakistani here, the highlighted sentence is a clear give away.



He seems to be a false flagger to me possibly an indian or afghani trying to make "us pakistanis" believe that we are worthless like him :lol:.

buddy you have no idea about women in Canada

sdt-2012-rise-of-intermarriage-49.png


Asian men who marry white women earn LESS than Asian men with Asian women. White women with Asian men earn over FIFTY PERCENT more than all other white women and are nearly twice as likely to be college educated. And they're younger.

fake
 
.
Tell me, who gave you the right to decide whether Mujahirs can own a city or not. If they can't own a city, neither can you. Sounds logical...Right!


Don't you think that it is the job of both "Muhajirs" and the Punjabis, Pashtuns, Balochs etc to understand each other and learn each other's ways. Why is the onus only on Muhajirs to assimilate?


Are Muhajirs not Pakistani enough? Which Pakistanis are you referring to here "And we Pakistanis have no problem with them"

lol who gave me a right? who are you as an Indian to have a say in this matter?I have a right to say anything i feel is right for my countrys internal affairs..

There are Sindhi urdu speaking people, Punjabi urdu speaking etc etc. but there is no such thing as Muhajir anymore period Muhajir were only the first generation,most of them have died. their offsprings are not muhajir they cant pop up a new identity 'muhajir' to do politics or build their own fortress inside Pakistan.They should respect the sanctity of this nation that welcomed them..Tomorrow 'Afghan Muhajir' will form another mqm in Quetta and ravage the city like muhajir politics did to Karachi .so the bad precedence should be never given space..btw im against politics based on ethnicity so dont think i have some sort of bias towards urdu speaking people.I have similar feelings towards other provincialist political parties.So dont shove things i didnt say..any Pakistani including urdu-speaking can own any city they want.but not do politics over it.
 
.
The last girl looks like a Han, not very sure, a mixed blood maybe.

modern Uyghurs = old Uyghurs + old Chinese + Tocharians

The old Han Chinese started to immigrate to Xinjiang as early as 2nd century BC, while the old Uyghurs arrived around 8th century.

Since the weakening of the Tang Dynasty back in the mid 8th century, China started to lose control on Xinjiang, those Chinese residents in Xinjiang had lost contact with their motherland, and being conquered and assimilated altogether with the remaining Tocharians by the Uyghur Khaganate.

That's why today's Uyghurs are mixed race with very diversified phenotype, ranging from full blown Han Chinese to White European-looking Caucasian.
 
. .
lol who gave me a right? who are you as an Indian to have a say in this matter?I have a right to say anything i feel is right for my countrys internal affairs..
I am just pointing out your hypocrisy. Your euphoric countrymen claim that Pakistan was built for muslims but you look down upon the very people who played a very important role in building it. And those muhajirs aren't aliens to me. They are my brothers, Their ancestors and my ancestors were relatives and were one family before partition, so obviously I will be concerned about their predicament.

They should respect the sanctity of this nation that welcomed them..
This is what I was speaking of, "Welcomed them"?? Really..! Are/Were they not part of the nation called Pakistan? Were they alien to the land?

Tomorrow 'Afghan Muhajir' will form another mqm in Quetta and ravage the city like muhajir politics did to Karachi .so the bad precedence should be never given space..btw im against politics based on ethnicity so dont think i have some sort of bias towards urdu speaking people.I have similar feelings towards other provincialist political parties.So dont shove things i didnt say..any Pakistani including urdu-speaking can own any city they want.but not do politics over it.
Afghan mujahir did not build your country, Indian muhajirs did and you already acknowledged that previously. You claim that you are against politics based on ethnicity yet your tenor otherizes Muhajirs as some aliens who do not belong to the land called Pakistan. Zulfikar Bhutto did not listen to the people of undivided Pakistan. Mujib got majority vote yet Bhutto and company did not make Mujib the PM of Pakistan. And what was the outcome? Your country got divided. This happened because your politicians including people like you do not believe in giving equal rights to the people of Pakistan.
 
.
Highly unlikely.

I am just pointing out your hypocrisy. Your euphoric countrymen claim that Pakistan was built for muslims but you look down upon the very people who played a very important role in building it. And those muhajirs aren't aliens to me. They are my brothers, Their ancestors and my ancestors were relatives and were one family before partition, so obviously I will be concerned about their predicament.
Pakistan was not built for all Muslims, it was built for only those muslims that voted in its favor back then .Abdul Kalam Azad your mullas dont come in that group nor the offsprings of the generation that chose not to leave India back then.People who have forgotten Operation polo and their 100,000 shehids dont come in that group. And certainly those who bark on it day in day out nor have trust in Pakistani state are not in that group.You think we are idiots that we set up a functioning country a grand economy and then your folks in order to escape Moodi or other random excuse , walk in as refugee to enjoy the fruits of this land...Just because Pakistan tries to play a role in Muslim conflicts doesnt mean its taking in the whole ummah on its land as frankly its not even realistic, we dont even have a capacity to support the whole ummah.Only selected people were chosen in past.The same will happen in future. Im giving you the real picture not the emotional ummati narrative.
So when you claim I look down upon the very people who played a very important role in building Pakistan.I say No sir..Im just sayin their offsprings have nothing to do with their struggle.

My ancestors played a big role in Babylonia state...Do i have a right to live in Iraq?
If your father invented telephone, can you claim fame for what he did.
Having ancestors in this context here as well means nothing.


This is what I was speaking of, "Welcomed them"?? Really..! Are/Were they not part of the nation called Pakistan? Were they alien to the land?
Yes we welcomed them just like ansaar welcomed muhajareen..Muhajareen were not hypocrites to form political divisions on the basis of being 'muhajir' or claim land as their right.Instead they married among ansaar and assimilated and lived in the same neighborhoods.

Afghan mujahir did not build your country, Indian muhajirs did and you already acknowledged that previously.
You claim that you are against politics based on ethnicity yet your tenor otherizes Muhajirs as some aliens who do not belong to the land called Pakistan. Zulfikar Bhutto did not listen to the people of undivided Pakistan. Mujib got majority vote yet Bhutto and company did not make Mujib the PM of Pakistan. And what was the outcome? Your country got divided. This happened because your politicians including people like you do not believe in giving equal rights to the people of Pakistan.

You probably dont know most of the terrorism that happened in Pakistan in past 30 years happened through Afghan and Indian "Muhajirs".We have a right to stop them , its a question of our own security.
In late 80s. A corrupt traitor Pakistani politician(secretary Shehryar Khan) let thousands of Indian Muslims drop in to Pakistani city of Karachi through illegal transit exits, as a result we had many complications and a problem of terrorism.
Many of them used to go back to India for training and them comeback for terrorist activities under the name of MQM (Muhajir Qomi movement).

It was both ways.West Pakistan wanted East Pakistan to separate on good terms and have its own autonomy and preferably form a union with each having its own head of state, however Mujib wanted to rule the whole Pakistan and he had votes for it(before winning elections he was busy in secessionism). Unfortunately the depart happened in agony from both sides esp. when a traitor tore up Polish resolution after a war was imposed on us.
You dont know anything about this event so you better not poke your nose in this issue.
 
Last edited:
.
Pakistan was not built for all Muslims, it was built for only those muslims that voted in its favor back then .Abdul Kalam Azad your mullas dont come in that group nor the offsprings of the generation that chose not to leave India back then.People who have forgotten Operation polo and their 100,000 shehids dont come in that group. And certainly those who bark on it day in day out nor have trust in Pakistani state are not in that group.You think we are idiots that we set up a functioning country a grand economy and then your folks in order to escape Moodi or other random excuse , walk in as refugee to enjoy the fruits of this land...Just because Pakistan tries to play a role in Muslim conflicts doesnt mean its taking in the whole ummah on its land as frankly its not even realistic, we dont even have a capacity to support the whole ummah.Only selected people were chosen in past.The same will happen in future. Im giving you the real picture not the emotional ummati narrative.
So when you claim I look down upon the very people who played a very important role in building Pakistan.I say No sir..Im just sayin their offsprings have nothing to do with their struggle.
Didn't Indian muhajirs vote in favour of Pakistan? So dont they have every right to be treated as equal citizen, yet you label them as terrorists. I dont think any Indian muslim is rearing to be in a country which is standing on the doles of IMF and China, So chin up. Even the most fiercest "kattar mullah" like Owaisi is very much pro-indian.. My ancestors chose India and I have no qualms about it. I can see how Indian Muhajirs are treated in the Pak Ummah land. Atleast I can proudly say in the face of Hindutva terrorists that I belong to this land. And lets not even speak about Operation Polo, you have nothing to do with it. It is my land and my concern, none of your business. You done zilch when Iraq, Yemen, Uighurs etc were ravaged...

My ancestors played a big role in Babylonia state...Do i have a right to live in Iraq?
If your father invented telephone, can you claim fame for what he did.
Having ancestors in this context here as well means nothing.
Well..you can claim citizenship based on your ancestors role. Many gorkhas do the same in Britain etc..

Yes we welcomed them just like ansaar welcomed muhajareen..Muhajareen were not hypocrites to form political divisions on the basis of being 'muhajir' or claim land as their right.Instead they married among ansaar and assimilated and lived in the same neighborhoods.
You have your views about them, so do they.. You can't force your views on others, the way you did with erstwhile East Pakistanis..

You probably dont know most of the terrorism that happened in Pakistan in past 30 years happened through Afghan and Indian "Muhajirs".We have a right to stop them , its a question of our own security.
In late 80s. A corrupt traitor Pakistani politician(secretary Shehryar Khan) let thousands of Indian Muslims drop in to Pakistani city of Karachi through illegal transit exits, as a result we had many complications and a problem of terrorism.
Many of them used to go back to India for training and them comeback for terrorist activities under the name of MQM (Muhajir Qomi movement).
So are you stating that the Muhajirs who played the most important role in formation of Pakistan went on to destabilize it siding with India?

It was both ways.West Pakistan wanted East Pakistan to separate on good terms and have its own autonomy and preferably form a union with each having its own head of state, however Mujib wanted to rule the whole Pakistan and he had votes for it(before winning elections he was busy in secessionism). Unfortunately the depart happened in agony from both sides esp. when a traitor tore up Polish resolution after a war was imposed on us.
You dont know anything about this event so you better not poke your nose in this issue.
So the west Pakistanis ruled over United Pakistan all the while till 1970s and then when an East Pakistani won the election, you decided to not give him the chance to rule united Pakistan, sounds hypocritical.. No? I know very well about the events but I am unaware about the narrative that is fed to you guys regarding Bangladesh creation.
 
.
Didn't Indian muhajirs vote in favour of Pakistan? So dont they have every right to be treated as equal citizen, yet you label them as terrorists. I dont think any Indian muslim is rearing to be in a country which is standing on the doles of IMF and China, So chin up. Even the most fiercest "kattar mullah" like Owaisi is very much pro-indian.. My ancestors chose India and I have no qualms about it. I can see how Indian Muhajirs are treated in the Pak Ummah land. Atleast I can proudly say in the face of Hindutva terrorists that I belong to this land. And lets not even speak about Operation Polo, you have nothing to do with it. It is my land and my concern, none of your business. You done zilch when Iraq, Yemen, Uighurs etc were ravaged...


Well..you can claim citizenship based on your ancestors role. Many gorkhas do the same in Britain etc..


You have your views about them, so do they.. You can't force your views on others, the way you did with erstwhile East Pakistanis..


So are you stating that the Muhajirs who played the most important role in formation of Pakistan went on to destabilize it siding with India?


So the west Pakistanis ruled over United Pakistan all the while till 1970s and then when an East Pakistani won the election, you decided to not give him the chance to rule united Pakistan, sounds hypocritical.. No? I know very well about the events but I am unaware about the narrative that is fed to you guys regarding Bangladesh creation.

I didn't even read your whole blabber after the first sentence.. it's useless to talk to discuss this with a below par iq person typying long posts with no substance. The urdu speaking people are happy here and play an important role in Pakistani politics...more than what Indian Muslims ever had back in their Homeland. You can take altaf Hussain and few like you who are currently seeking refuge in India.. we don't need them.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom