Just because semitic people originate from the lands your cancer state now occupies does not mean they are Arabian. In the same way dinosaurs can't have nationalities because they predate nations, the semitic peoples and civilisation you co-opt and believe to be yours are not.
Europeans have more world heritage sites that have impacted civilisation. Some unimportant arab caliphs tomb is not pinnacle to world civilisation. Also just because arab states now occupy the lands that hold these world heritage sites does not mean they originally created them. E.g. Walter Brattain being born in China does not mean his co-invention of the transistor is Chinese
For the most of recorded history it has not been Arabs because Arabs have only been relevant since 600AD, prior to that it has been mostly Greeks, some Roman, Indian and East asian specifically Chinese. Many scientists of the islamic golden age were in fact Iranian and otherwise not Arab.
Same dinosaur analogy I used above.
No where in the article about skin colour does it mention anything about Arabs. And it doesn't even matter if light features came from the "nowadays arab world", because Arabs are not light skinned, phoenicians are but they're not arabs. And I don't have anything against the middle east except the arab and zionist cancer states that are in it.
I see you subscribe to the magic dirt theory, seeing as how you believe that anything that has remotely interacted with modern day arab lands is now arab and an accomplishment of arabs.
Everyone does come on.
Is there no limit to your nonsense shithole inhabitant and originator?
What are you blabbering about? The first Semites originated in Arabia. They lived there for millennia before they migrated elsewhere in the region and elsewhere in the world. Modern-day Arabians have their DNA. As do other people in the region. This has been confirmed by DNA ages ago. So by every measure those people are our people and vice versa. Modern-day nationalities do not matter. Similar to an Italian citizen being able to claim Roman civilization despite not being a Roman citizen nowadays and despite the Roman empire being much, much more than just Rome itself. Obviously your pea-sized brain does not understand this simple fact. Not to mention that human migrations have occurred in the Arab world since forever and keeps accruing while we speak hence the influx of fellow Arabs and foreigners to the GCC to this day. Even Europeans lived in Arabia due to slavery, trade and other reasons. Greeks and Romans had a presence in modern-day Hijaz as well.
You are posting some outdated statistic. When there are 20 + Arab countries it is difficult for 1 Arab country to have more than 15 World UNESCO Heritage Sites given the fact that otherwise there would be 200 + World UNESCO Heritage sites in the Arab world alone and that would be around 50% of total heritage sites in the world.
I wrote the combined World UNESCO Heritage Sites of states in Arabia being the largest number in the MENA region. That is a fact. When you were blabbering nonsense about Arabia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_the_Arab_states
Also the world Unesco heritage sites native to the Arab world are some of the most famous, influential and oldest in the world. Obviously of 1000 times greater importance than some freaking water fall in Austria or some nature heritage sites as most of those countries listed have. I am talking about heritage. Not some waterfall or protected area nominated for UNESCO.
Or do you want to compare Babylon, The Pyramids, Sphinx, Petra, Hatra, Mada'in Saleh with some "ancient" heritage sites in England, Australia, USA or what is it?
Now you are blabbering again. Nobody disputes European/Western domination of science in the past 500 years. I already wrote that. However recorded history is not 500 years old and for most of recorded history that was not the case. What is modern-day Arab world, the cradle of civilization, was that. That is where science itself originated from ffs. Alphabet, writing etc. as well. The reason why I can have a conversation with a retard on PDF right now.
Arabs are Caucasian people genetically and historically. Even the case legally in the the most race obsessed country in the Western World (USA). Arabs are mostly olive skinned and last time I checked that is white. Not black. "Brown" is also Caucasian not Negro. Nor Mongoloid. Just like there are different shades of brown, red, black, blonde etc. hair. Most Arabs, when not exposed to the sun, are rather pale. But just like Southern Europeans during the summer, Arabs easily tan and it cannot be any differently when we live where we do.
Now stop wasting my time with your nonsense. You started blabbering about "white people" not knowing that the "white race" and "white skin color" originated in what is now the Arab world. Or the fact that Arabs have praised their mostly olive skin since forever. The same skin color that Europeans from the North are paying for to get during the summer when they tan all day on the beach. Women love it as well by large. I can tell you that. Now take your medicine.
The empty part is the problem, its how Indian spy entered from Iran and managed to evade authorities for a while, he probably lived in remote region in Baluchistan organising anti Pakistani terrorists before he got caught. Empty porous border with Iran is all ready rife with drug smugglers, Sunni Jihadists, anti Pakistani terrorists. Now if Iran gets attacked and destroyed we are looking at massive influx of Indian and CIA operatives freely fucking things up in Pakistan.
The other issue is we have a Shia Muslim population anywhere between 20% to 30%, attack on Iran would start sectarian conflict in Pakistan. While we do have a problem with Iranian backed brainwashed Pakistani shias but they're a small minority when compared to extremist Deobandi & Salafi terrorist organisations that have many times promised to wipe out Shias in Pakistan.
We can't afford any more conflict definitely not your Arab VS Persian race wars, just wish you guys just fight it out in your own countries instead of using proxies and using religion to further your political agendas in our country.
PS: I don' hate Arabs, I just like my fellow Pakistanis more then Arabs.
At least it is mostly empty land and not much traffic on that border. Compare that with for example the KSA-Yemen border and we can talk, lol.
Why would that occur? Afghanistan next door was 1000 times worse for Pakistan due to sharing a much, much more important border and having your second biggest ethnicity living in both countries (Pashtuns) and yet you are still standing. Much more difficult border too.
There are already a sectarian conflict in Pakistan for years. It cannot get any worse. You have a problem if a large segment of your country (Shias) would create havoc if a foreign country (Iran) was to be invaded. A really big one.
You should complain to the leaders of said countries not to ordinary people. I for instance have no interest in creating some "sectarian war" in Pakistan. Or any sectarian wars for that matter.
BTW, your conflict with India is also potentially putting the nearby region in danger in case of a nuclear conflict. So all the ills, dare I say the vast majority, in Pakistan are not the fault of something that goes on in the Middle East 1000's of km away. As in their heartlands and conflict zones because last time I checked there are no major conflicts along the Pakistani-Iranian border or the maritime border between Pakistan and the GCC.
Well, I completely understand your thinking and support it. I just hope that this also includes Iranians and other foreigners otherwise those are empty words.
How many Emiratis or Arabians (or Arabs for that matter) live in Iran nowadays?
you need to read at least one book or one page about semetic people
