What's new

U.S. rushing to build an Afghan army to battle insurgents

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
U.S. rushing to build an Afghan army to battle insurgents

By Thomas L. Day, McClatchy Newspapers Thomas L. Day, Mcclatchy Newspapers – Wed Dec 30.

KABUL, Afghanistan — Several hundred Afghan National Army recruits marched 22 miles Tuesday on an undulating path at the foot of the towering Hindu Kush mountains, toting M-16 rifles and carrying 20-pound packs on their backs.

Army Sgt. 1st Class Ronald Cousan , a Louisiana native, marched every step of the way with them, but he carried only an iPod. Cousan was more consultant than drill sergeant. He was there to watch, and when necessary to give advice through an interpreter.

The effort to enlarge and train the Afghan army is critical to the Obama administration's plan to defeat the Taliban and al Qaida , pacify much of Afghanistan and begin to withdraw at least some U.S. forces in 2011. Success, however, is far from guaranteed: The Afghan military remains plagued by corruption, ethnic rivalries and illiteracy, and by its almost complete dependence on American logistical and intelligence support.

At the Kabul Military Training Center , about 1,400 recruits enter every two weeks to begin an eight-week training regimen, the equivalent of the U.S. Army's boot camp. The Afghan army ostensibly runs the center, but the U.S. and its NATO partners send several "mentors" to each training exercise.

The 22,000-acre training center was built by the Soviets, taken over by the U.S.-backed mujahedeen who ousted them in 1989 and then by the Taliban who ousted the mujahedeen.

A junkyard with hundreds of destroyed Soviet tanks sits in the middle of the camp, but the new Afghan army is being built and trained to fight Islamist insurgents, not to stop an invasion by a neighboring superpower.

"We have recognized that the military we're building here . . . is different from a Cold War military," said Col. Dennis Brown of the Georgia National Guard's 48th Brigade , who oversees much of the training.

The few Afghan soldiers who learn to fire artillery shoot only at targets they can see, as opposed to those 10 miles away, and the Afghan army has few tanks.

"In this terrain, big heavy vehicles don't do well," said Brown, from Marietta, Ga. , a lesson the U.S. is learning for itself as it replaces its heavy Mine-Protected Ambush-Resistant armored vehicles with lighter, more agile off-road versions.

Afghan soldiers are schooled in urban combat, in storming the home of a suspected insurgent and in reacting to the improvised explosive devices that are the insurgents' deadliest weapons.

"Like an assembly line," said Staff Sgt. Daniel Nevarez of Fort Carson, Colo. , an American mentor at the IED training facility.

About a year ago, the Americans stopped issuing the Afghans Soviet-designed AK-47 automatic rifles in favor of the NATO M-16, a rifle that's more accurate but less tolerant of dirt, dust and water.

The change may seem to be a minor one, but the AK's reputation for functioning best when it's set on full automatic and spraying bullets isn't well suited to a counterinsurgency campaign that's trying to teach fire discipline and minimize civilian causalities.

One thing the Afghan trainees don't learn, however, is how to read. About 20 percent of the recruits are literate, but nobody seems concerned about that.

"Most of the training is practical, since most of our soldiers are illiterate," said Afghan Maj. Mohammed Shapoon Sharipyar.

President Barack Obama's new Afghanistan strategy includes an accelerated effort to expand the Afghan army to 134,000 by October of next year, but his timetable leaves little time for new Afghan soldiers to learn more than essential skills.

The Kabul Military Training Center , one of four similar training facilities in Afghanistan , has cut its regimen to eight weeks from 10, and pay for recruits has nearly doubled, from about $120 to $210 a month.

"Since the pay raise has been implemented, the challenge has been finding enough space for them," said Brown.

Recruiting in Afghanistan's harsh winter months is typically stronger than it is in the warmer months. In the spring, when construction companies resume hiring, recruiting ebbs.

Brown is anticipating a similar drop around April. "The strategy is to over-recruit during the good months," he said.

Some observers, however, wonder whether the quality of Afghan army recruits matters more than the number of Afghan army recruits.

When asked why they enlisted, three Afghan recruits, standing at attention, insisted that they joined because they wanted to protect their country, not their tribes or their villages.

"When I watched the army on TV, I was motivated to join," said Abdul Samad , a recruit who was in his first week of training.

Still, American commanders remain skeptical.

There are far more Tajiks in the Afghan army than there are Pashtuns, even though Pashtuns are the largest and most important ethnic group in the country, particularly in the eastern and southern provinces where the insurgency is strongest.

Brown conceded that many soldiers identify with their families first, and their ethnicity, tribe or village second.

"And third would probably be the army and the central government," he said. "It's going to take time."

Like cuisine, few militaries are 100 percent original.

The American military, in many ways, was constructed from the British model, and the Afghan army maintains some of the flavor of its former Soviet occupiers. The Afghans' marching style, with its high leg kicks, was clearly learned from the Red Army , and so, for better or worse, was its management style.

Afghan non-commissioned officers and low-level officers are given no freedom to act without precise instructions from their commanders.

"You respond to your orders, you make no decisions, you just do what you are told," Brown said of the Afghan army underlings.

That's a "culture" that the U.S. mentors are trying to break, Brown said, but that's not an overnight process, and the mentoring continues after the recruits graduate from the training center.

Embedded Training Units — teams of about six U.S. soldiers who live with small Afghan units — are scattered all over Afghanistan . Brown estimated that there are about 100 in the capital city of Kabul alone.

(Day reports for The Telegraph of Macon, Ga. )

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY
 
.
I can see one huge mess in afghanistan in the near future. The yanks will pack up and leave after failing to achieve anything meanigfull.

The americans are now looking to save some face and they are hoping that the ANA will give them the face saving they need before they leave fully knowing that the ANA is not really a 'National' army and its recruits might be willing to fight for their own areas but certainly not for the afghan 'nation'

The Tajiks are not willing to have the Pashtuns in any real influential role. Due to some historical perspective they do have some justification as Pashtun domiated govenrments in the past have rutelessly supressed the other ethnicites of Afghanistan.

Now the Tajiks want to draw blood and settle old scores.

Afghanistan is one fucked up place and I bet the Russians are snickering at the Americans as the same old story unfolds in Afghanistan yet again.
 
.
Doesn't matter how big or well armed; the moment Nato packs its bags and runs (sorry, I meant Afghanises the war), the Afhan army will fall apart like a pack of cards.

And Pakistani diplomats had better start planning for a post Nato Afghanistan scenario.
 
. .
Inorder to make ANA a highly professional Army in this timespan the US needs a lamp and the GENE who could fullfill this wish ...:D
 
.
CIA caught in dirty and secretive war against al-Qaeda on Afghan border


The deaths of seven CIA agents in Khost province have brought into the limelight the secretive and dirty war being fought by America’s intelligence agencies — and the Taleban and al-Qaeda — in the border regions of Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Forward Operating Base Chapman, and others like it along the border, are the forward edge of American military and intelligence counter-terrorism operations, aimed principally at hunting down senior figures in al-Qaeda and their allies in the Taleban hiding in the lawless tribal belt.

The CIA’s main strike weapons are the drones that loiter over the border areas 24 hours a day, watching and listening to telephone networks. While the drones provide surveillance and electronic intelligence and carry out strikes, human intelligence is far harder to acquire among remote communities suspicious of any outsider.

Then there are the night raids against suspected insurgent and al-Qaeda linked leaders. It was an operation by what are euphemistically called “other government agencies” that was alleged to have killed a number of students in Kunar province on Saturday, causing widespread anger in Afghanistan.

have proved controversial before. A UN-commissioned report last year from Philip Alston, director of the New York Centre for Human Rights, claimed that such raids raised issues under humanitarian and international law.

The report criticised the “opaque” use of ultra-secretive CIA units operating alongside irregular Afghan militias such as the Pashai.

Professor Alston complained that many raids were “composed of Afghans but with a handful, at most, of international people directing it” and were “not accountable to any international military authority”.

Such units answer directly to the Pentagon rather than to the Nato command structure, and their operations are often so secretive that even other US forces operating nearby are sometimesmay be unaware of them.

Such has been the effectiveness of strikes on the terrorist command structure that there are persistent reports of al-Qaeda leadership figures relocating to urban areas in Pakistan and shifting the focus of their operations towards Yemen, Somalia and other areas of the Horn of Africa.

The Taleban have infinitely smaller resources. But their successful strike within a CIA base indicates that their own intelligence operation can also hit its mark.


CIA caught in dirty and secretive war against al-Qaeda on Afghan border - Times Online
 
. .
already have - sleeper cells!

Sir, was the recent attack done by a Pakistani Talib or an Afghan?



What's extremely worrisome is the Americans arming and equipping to teeth minorities against pashtun majority in Afghanistan. ANA is just a will provide a cover for their dirty objectives, more war and bloodshed for poor Afghans. And it's spill effects into Pakistan. This policy roughly translates as "oh dear minorities you been oppressed, here're some weapons, go duke it out"
 
.
It's very likely Talibans will try to infiltrate this recruitment.

not sure where you've been

it's been going on for years already.....and often, inducted cadets go straight to taleban since the latter offer more cash incentives
 
.
Doesn't matter how big or well armed; the moment Nato packs its bags and runs (sorry, I meant Afghanises the war), the Afhan army will fall apart like a pack of cards.

And Pakistani diplomats had better start planning for a post Nato Afghanistan scenario.

Failure to correctly analyze the situation will most certainly result in opinions, which will sit far from the truth as it seems the case here! Should the strategic planning be labeled as “NATO packing its bag and running”? The transition of NATO and US forces in accordance with the Afghan Security forces and Afghan government outlines our goals for the near future. Does that mean our achievements should be overlooked? Does that mean hopelessness for the future? Are you aware, The Lashkar Gah cotton factory in Helmand Province recently reopened, creating more jobs for working Afghans and invigorating the local economy? The factory’s reopening restores 175 jobs, and is expected to create up to 225 more new jobs in the coming months. The teacher training college in Lashkar Gah, one of 42 across Afghanistan, is now offering teaching certification programs to certify Afghans as professional teachers. This new effort by the Ministry of Education is designed to help rebuild the nation’s education infrastructure and will eventually be implemented at each of its teacher training colleges. In Mazar-e Sharif and Kunduz City, a silk worm breeding project to create fine silk rugs and clothing is running successfully. At the Mazar-e Sharif women’s-only market, 20 shops were recently renovated. Both enterprises are providing stable employment opportunities for women.

Progress in Afghanistan Highlighted by Business Growth, Job Creation and New Infrastructure Projects

Do you still believe the US has not “achieved anything meaningful”? In the 90 days before 25 November, our Special Operations Forces conducted 1,756 operations resulting in 385 insurgent leaders either killed or captured, 909 lower level fighters killed and 2,590 insurgents captured. Should US teaching counterinsurgency methods to the Afghan Security forces so they can independently protect the people and serve the common good be labeled as “Afghanises the war”? The US and NATO forces have made great stride in freeing Afghanistan from the grip of Taliban and ultimately it will be up to the people of Afghanistan to overcome any differences over ethnicities and build on the structure laid by the US.

To suggest, “Pakistan diplomats’ better start planning for post NATO Afghanistan scenario” is an understatement. Pakistan is well aware of the threat that lies over the nation by the homegrown insurgency. The US recognizes Pakistan, as a key ally on this WOT and continues to strengthen their strategic alliance. Billions of dollars in military aid have been provided and billions more are promised over the next few years. If any of the recent attacks at Mohmand, CID building or the Mosque in Peshawar are any indication then Pakistan must tackle the problem now and terrorism must be eliminated from its land.

LCDR Bill Speaks
DET, United States Central Command
CENTCOM

Life is changing for the better in Helmand province - British Army Website

YouTube - The Mayor of Kandahar
 
.
lol... people think we just going to pack our bags and leave lol


We will never leave Afganistan. Never
 
.
Heck now even afghan civilians have started likin the taliban according to a survey.71-75% want nNATO out by 2011... E.U doesnt believe in afghan war anymore.... but its ur choice.
 
.
Still, American commanders remain skeptical.

There are far more Tajiks in the Afghan army than there are Pashtuns, even though Pashtuns are the largest and most important ethnic group in the country, particularly in the eastern and southern provinces where the insurgency is strongest.

Many Pashtuns especially in the south glorify the Taliban as Khorasan warriors. Afghanis, especially the hardcore Pashtun Nationalist in the South bear no love or emotions for the National Army.

Here are a few words of a Pashtun who had recided in Afghanistan:

the Taliban influence is increasing/expanding gradually in Afghanistan particularly the South; moreover it has been alleged to heighten to a greater extent in the next few years. Many Pashtuns glorify the Taliban, and no offence though your Army (aka the Hashish Army) that’s been dazing while at war is not popular amongst the Population in Afghanistan (especially the south) let alone state that it is opposing the Taliban for Pashtuns.
 
.
Heck now even afghan civilians have started likin the taliban according to a survey.71-75% want nNATO out by 2011... E.U doesnt believe in afghan war anymore.... but its ur choice.

The Taliban where ruthless to there own people...

What people want is Afganistan to run there nation... and we perfectly understand that...

Thats why we are helping them in every way possible, and the Government must be PRO American.

If not. out they go :usflag:
 
.
So you guys basically want them to run their country your way (!) hail democracy *with the nazi salute*
One thing I must point out that the American training methods must be extremely poor that even after 9 years the Afghan Army is not on its feet.
Pakistan was once occupied by the British and they left in 1947 and the first COAS and the Air Chief were British officers but within ONE year the Pakistani Army was battle ready ( we had the 1948 Kashmir war ) and within less than ten years the affairs of the armed forces were completely run by Pakistanis themselves.
So it would seem that either the Afghans are extremely incompetent, or the American approach and training methods are extremely bad.
Either way it’s a very poor reflection on the US involvement in Afghanistan
 
.
Back
Top Bottom