RabzonKhan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 4,289
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
U.S. Pakistan Aid Shows Little Progress
WSJ
By TOM WRIGHT
ASIA NEWS
FEBRUARY 8, 2011
The U.S. civilian-aid program for Pakistan has failed to show it is achieving its goals since Congress approved a $7.5 billion five-year assistance package in late 2009, according to an official U.S. government assessment.
The report, released jointly this week by the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Department of State and Department of Defense, found U.S. aid officials on the ground in Pakistan had failed to supply data to allow a systematic evaluation of whether the assistance was helping stabilize the nation.
"One year after the launch of the civilian assistance strategy in Pakistan, USAID has not been able to demonstrate measurable progress," said the report, an assessment of the program for the final three months of 2010. "We believe that USAID has an imperative to accumulate, analyze, and report information on the results achieved under its programs."
The Obama administration is hoping the aid program to Pakistan, the second-largest recipient of U.S. civilian aid after Afghanistan, will help stabilize the fragile but strategically important country and boost America's image among ordinary Pakistanis. The program is focusing on funding visible infrastructure like bridges, roads and power stations.
But the U.S. strategy has faced a number of obstacles, including an Islamist insurgency that has made it dangerous for U.S. aid personnel to operate in some parts of the country. The U.S. remains deeply unpopular in Pakistan, in part due to strikes by unmanned Central Intelligence Agency drones against Taliban militants on the border with Afghanistan. The strikes also have killed civilians.
The report found that USAID, the lead U.S government agency for overseeing foreign civilian assistance, has been unable to recruit sufficient staff to oversee its Pakistan program. Its local office had 228 employees at the end of 2010, against a target of 296.
"Ongoing security threats impede effective implementation and monitoring of assistance," the report said.
The U.S. has moved to change the way it distributes aid, funneling more money through the Pakistan government and local organizations rather than international contractors. Contractors handled 90% of previous U.S. assistance programs and were unpopular among Pakistanis.
The aim is to build the capacity of Pakistani institutions. The report noted the U.S. government had taken steps to ensure that funneling so much money through Pakistan's government, which has a reputation for corruption, does not lead to misuse of funds. These steps include first auditing the agencies and nongovernmental organizations.
But the report said relying on Pakistani institutions could lead to malfeasance. "Limited institutional capacityespecially in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Baluchistancreates a risk that resources might be lost through inefficiency, theft, or general lack of capacity to handle large amounts of funding," it said.
WSJ
By TOM WRIGHT
ASIA NEWS
FEBRUARY 8, 2011
The U.S. civilian-aid program for Pakistan has failed to show it is achieving its goals since Congress approved a $7.5 billion five-year assistance package in late 2009, according to an official U.S. government assessment.
The report, released jointly this week by the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Department of State and Department of Defense, found U.S. aid officials on the ground in Pakistan had failed to supply data to allow a systematic evaluation of whether the assistance was helping stabilize the nation.
"One year after the launch of the civilian assistance strategy in Pakistan, USAID has not been able to demonstrate measurable progress," said the report, an assessment of the program for the final three months of 2010. "We believe that USAID has an imperative to accumulate, analyze, and report information on the results achieved under its programs."
The Obama administration is hoping the aid program to Pakistan, the second-largest recipient of U.S. civilian aid after Afghanistan, will help stabilize the fragile but strategically important country and boost America's image among ordinary Pakistanis. The program is focusing on funding visible infrastructure like bridges, roads and power stations.
But the U.S. strategy has faced a number of obstacles, including an Islamist insurgency that has made it dangerous for U.S. aid personnel to operate in some parts of the country. The U.S. remains deeply unpopular in Pakistan, in part due to strikes by unmanned Central Intelligence Agency drones against Taliban militants on the border with Afghanistan. The strikes also have killed civilians.
The report found that USAID, the lead U.S government agency for overseeing foreign civilian assistance, has been unable to recruit sufficient staff to oversee its Pakistan program. Its local office had 228 employees at the end of 2010, against a target of 296.
"Ongoing security threats impede effective implementation and monitoring of assistance," the report said.
The U.S. has moved to change the way it distributes aid, funneling more money through the Pakistan government and local organizations rather than international contractors. Contractors handled 90% of previous U.S. assistance programs and were unpopular among Pakistanis.
The aim is to build the capacity of Pakistani institutions. The report noted the U.S. government had taken steps to ensure that funneling so much money through Pakistan's government, which has a reputation for corruption, does not lead to misuse of funds. These steps include first auditing the agencies and nongovernmental organizations.
But the report said relying on Pakistani institutions could lead to malfeasance. "Limited institutional capacityespecially in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Baluchistancreates a risk that resources might be lost through inefficiency, theft, or general lack of capacity to handle large amounts of funding," it said.