What's new

U.S. military chief admits there is no way to stop terrorists pouring through Pakista

Ghareeb_Da_Baal

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
6,654
Reaction score
4
Country
Argentina
Location
Argentina
U.S. military chief admits there is no way to stop terrorists pouring through Pakistan-Afghanistan border
By IAN DRURY
Last updated at 6:45 PM on 29th December 2010
Comments (18)
Add to My Stories


Tough fight: Colonel Viet Luong said it is naive to think you can prevent forces crossing the border
The porous border between Afghanistan and Pakistan that Taliban fighters slip across to attack British troops is impossible to seal, a top military commander has admitted.
The 1,600-mile rugged frontier, dotted with mountain passes and treacherous routes, would take 'an inordinate amount of resources' to secure, said the U.S. colonel.
Instead, it is more useful for coalition soldiers to protect Afghan towns and villages that are vulnerable to insurgent raids.
Military chiefs have been concerned about the steady flow of terrorists and arms - including components for deadly roadside bombs - across the lawless border, especially into Helmand and Kandahar provinces in southern Afghanistan where nearly 10,000 UK troops are based.
The Taliban often pass along little-known routes and back over the border into Pakistan to take injured fighters to hospitals.
Colonel Viet Luong, of the U.S. Army, said Western diplomats should also try to foster greater cooperation from the tribes inside Pakistan who often provide Islamist fighters safe passage across the frontier.
His remarks came as the Ministry of Defence announced that another UK soldier had been killed in the war - the 103rd this year.
The bomb disposal expert, who served with 23 Pioneer Regiment, The Royal Logistic Corps, was clearing a road with the Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Task Force in Lashkar Gah district when he was caught in a blast on Tuesday.
He was the 348th British serviceman or woman to die in the conflict since it begun in 2001.
Col Luong, who oversees troops in a part of eastern Afghanistan that includes the volatile Khost province, said: 'It's naive to say that we can stop enemy forces coming through the border.'

Dangerous: U.S. specialists Elterbrock Andrew, right, and Steven Galvin of U.S. 2nd Platoon Bravo Company 2-327 Infantry take cover during a Taliban attack on Badel Combat Outpost Pakistani border
He said troops under his command were still working to control the border but were more productively deployed protecting more populated Afghan areas from the Taliban.
Operations and patrols had increased four-fold to 12,000 in the past year while the effectiveness of enemy fire had been halved, he said.
'Local atmospherics are indicating that the people of Khost are beginning to feel that security is much, much better,' said Col Luong.
'More importantly, for the first time, they're feeling that the provincial government is now working for the people.'

Porous: Private Nikolai Starr looks out over the mountainous border that the U.S. say is impossible to seal

Specialist Wilson Christopher at Badel Combat Outpost takes aim in an area where terrorists are exported
A senior British Army source said: 'The border is extremely porous and it is almost impossible to stop people crossing it if they are determined.
'Instead we are concentrating on pushing back the Taliban and holding ground in the villages and towns of Afghanistan to provide security for local people.
'At the same time, we need to know where crossing points are, try to make it difficult for insurgents to move around and track where they go if possible.'
Meanwhile, evidence emerged of a worrying new trend where militant groups on both sides of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border have joined forces hands to carry out deadly raids in their latest attempt to regain the initiative after months of withering attacks from Nato forces.
Enlarge
Deteriorating situation: UN maps reveal how over time more Afghan areas are becoming 'high risk' zones
Intelligence assessments from the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) have suggested insurgent factions are setting aside historic rivalries to behave like 'a syndicate' and co-ordinate attacks.
The Pentagon has been forced to deny reports that American forces are conducting special operations raids inside Pakistan's tribal areas to target militants.
But this year the U.S. military has launched more than 100 airstrikes using drones in Pakistan's mountainous border areas, a haven for hundreds of Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters, killing more than 750 people.
ISAF are also keeping a close eye on the Pakistani city of Quetta from where Taliban commanders are believed to be overseeing the stubborn insurgency across the border.


Read more: US admit no way to stop Taliban terrorists through Pakistan-Afghanistan border | Mail Online
 
damm....i figured that out long time ago. :coffee:

i am also starting to think that US is fighting useless war now.
 
damm....i figured that out long time ago. :coffee:

i am also starting to think that US is fighting useless war now.

It became useless the day AQ folks escaped from Tora-Bora if you look back at the war. After that its just been one tactical fight after another with the Pashtuns.
 
It became useless the day AQ folks escaped from Tora-Bora if you look back at the war. After that its just been one tactical fight after another with the Pashtuns.



so that was the day, this war should have been over?
 
The article starting this thread and the one here:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/u-s-fo...nt-seal-afghan-pakistan-border-commander.html
are a joke.

firstly there is no agreement between the current Afghan government and the GOP on the border, ie The Durand Line. Even the then taliban govt in Afghanistan would not accept this.

The matter of closing the border has been raised earlier in other threads and it was then expose that the US did not want the border sealed. So what is all this about, change of heart or brain finally engaged?

Stationary outposts will NOT seal the border nor can a fence due to the terrain. BUT serious patrolling by both US and their Afghan friends with real co operation with Pakistan can close it down more that it currently is.
So far from what I have read it has been the US and specifically the Afghan govt who have had the negative approach to all this.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom