What's new

U.S. is using electronic warfare to attack in waves

SpArK

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
22,519
Reaction score
18
Country
India
Location
India
U.S. is using electronic warfare to attack in waves

EA-18 Growler jets have been deployed to Libya. Instead of bombs, they carry an array of radars, antennas and high-tech gear to thwart enemy air-defense systems.


63145193.jpg

In the skies above Libya, the U.S. Navy has been deploying a small fleet of supersonic EA-18 Growler jets to "jam" Moammar Kadafi's ground radar, giving NATO fighters and bombers free rein to strike tanks, communication depots and other strategic targets.

It's the latest demonstration of "electronic attack" hardware — the "EA" in the Growler's name. Armies have been waging electronic warfare since World War II, but today's technology packs a strategic wallop unforeseen even a decade ago.

With foreign adversaries continuing to improve their radar capabilities and air defense networks, and terrorists worldwide using modern consumer electronics to trigger explosives, the United States is spending billions of dollars in a massive effort to respond. These jammers, for instance, spew radio waves and emit other electromagnetic noise to jumble enemy electronic signals.

"War fighters have gone from using physical weapons like spears and knives, to chemical weapons such as gunpowder and explosives, to electronics with radio waves and computer codes," said Peter W. Singer, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. "It's a natural evolution in warfare."

At a time when the defense budget is being eyed for cuts, electronic attack technology is one of the few areas — along with drones and cyber security — in which President Obama wants to boost spending.

The Pentagon is seeking to increase its technology research budget, which includes electronic warfare, to $12.2 billion in fiscal 2012 from $11.8 billion — and that doesn't include spending in the classified portion of the budget.

Electronic warfare technology — much of it top secret — aims to counterbalance foreign militaries' multimillion-dollar investments in shoring up air defenses and continuing advancements in radar detection.

With a price tag of about $74 million each, Boeing Co.'s Growler is a showpiece of American electronic know-how with high-powered radar systems made by Raytheon Co., and tactical radar jammers made by ITT Electronic Systems and Northrop Grumman Corp.

The Growlers, based at the Naval Air Station Whidbey Island in Washington, look like imposing fighters armed to the hilt with big bombs slung under their wings ready to drop on the enemy. That's because the plane is a modified version of the F/A-18 Super Hornet. But a closer look reveals that instead of bombs, it carries an array of radars, antennas and high-tech gear.

Each of the devices hanging from the Growler's wings performs a different function, including pinpointing the location of enemy radar sites, intercepting and jamming radio signals and following the changing enemy radar tactics.

"Our job is to control the electromagnetic spectrum over the battlefield," said Capt. Mark W. Darrah, Growler program manager for the Navy. "The only way you know if an electronic attack was successful is if every plane returns safely from their missions."

The proof of its success in Libya, he said, is that NATO has carried out 5,000 strike missions and no aircraft has been shot down.

The Growlers' fuselage sections are manufactured inside Northrop's 1-million-square-foot facility on Aviation Boulevard, about a mile south of Los Angeles International Airport.

Until the Growler was deployed in Libya, the Navy was still operating the Vietnam-era EA-6 Prowler for electronic attack missions. The Growler is nearly twice as fast as its predecessor, traveling at speeds of up to 1,100 mph, and takes two rather than four people in the cockpit to carry out missions.



But as the Growler enters wartime service, work has already begun on a new jamming device for the jet to give it an even greater ability to befuddle the enemy.

Four aerospace giants are competing for a jamming device contract estimated at $2 billion: Northrop, BAE Systems, and Raytheon Co and a team of ITT and Boeing. A total of $168 million has been handed out by the Navy to the companies for research and development on the program.


The goal is to begin producing new jamming devices on the Growler, the upcoming F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jet and possibly unmanned drones by 2018, said defense analyst Thompson.

Requirements for the new jammer haven't been finalized or announced. Little is known about the details and capabilities as electronic warfare has always been shrouded in secrecy in order to stay ahead of potential adversaries.

But that hasn't stopped speculation about what's being considered and how it might be used. It is likely to give the Growler the capability to launch cyber attacks by slipping viruses into enemy computer networks from thousands of feet above, Thompson said.:blink:

This technology may have been used by Israel in a 2007 bombing of a Syrian nuclear facility, according to counter-terrorism expert Richard A. Clarke, a former advisor to the National Security Council, in his 2010 book, "Cyber War."

He wrote that during the attack, Israel may have used radio waves to transmit computer data packets the Syrian air defense network.

"Those packets made the system malfunction, but they also told it not to act [like] there was anything wrong with it. They may have just replayed a do-loop of the sky as it was before the attack," Clarke wrote. "The sky would look just like it had when it was empty, even though it was, in actuality, filled with Israeli fighters."

Another weapon under development in the nation's electronic arsenal is a 9-foot-long missile armed not with explosives but with a warhead that spews electromagnetic waves to disable and distract enemy defenses.

Work on the warheads is being done at Raytheon's sprawling electronics facility in El Segundo. Engineers there have been perfecting the electronic attack technology in underground clean rooms for decades.

Details of the miniature air-launched decoy, or MALD, emerged recently at the Paris Air Show, where Raytheon announced the first successful test of the technology. The Pentagon has invested more than $500 million in the technology, which is being developed for the Air Force.

The missile weighs less than 300 pounds and could be carried by F-16 and F/A-18 fighters or B-52 bombers. Or they could be dropped by the dozens from massive cargo jets. Although small, the MALD's high-tech electronics make them appear to be as large as a fleet of bombers on enemy radar screens.

"This is the new generation of electronic warfare," said Jeff White, a Raytheon business development manager and former Marine Corps pilot. "The enemy should never know what's coming their way."


EA-18 Growler: U.S. is using electronic warfare to attack in waves - Page 2 - latimes.com
 
. . .
EA-18G Eelectronic warfare

The EA-18G integrates advanced airborne electronic attack capabilities, developed and manufactured by Northrop Grumman, with the advanced strike capabilities, including advanced weapons, sensors and communications systems, installed on the F/A-18 Super Hornet aircraft.

The block 1 Growler is fitted with up to three AN/ALQ-99 radar jamming pods, together with an AN/ALQ-218(V)2 receiver and a Raytheon AN/ALQ-227 communications countermeasures system both of which are mounted in the bay previously designated as the F/A-18 Hornet aircraft's gun bay.

The AN/ALQ-99 jammer fitted on the block 1 Growler is supplied by the EDO Corporation. The AN/ALQ-99 receivers are installed in the tail of the aircraft and the AN/ALQ-99 pod houses the exciters and the high radiated power jamming transmitters.

"The Growler aircraft has 11 weapon stations for carrying electronic mission systems and weapons."
The block 2 Growler is equipped with the APG-79 multi-mode radar with passive detection mode and active radar suppression, ALQ-218(V)2 digital radar warning receiver and ALE-47 countermeasures dispenser.

The advanced tactical radar, the APG-79 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar provides air-to-air and air-to-ground capability with detection, targeting, tracking and protection modes. The radar is supplied by Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems at El Segundo, California.

The interleaved radar modes include real beam-mapping mode and synthetic aperture radar mode with air-to-air search, air-to-air tracking, sea surface search and ground moving target indication and tracking. The radar has an advanced four-channel receiver-exciter which provides wide bandwidth capability and the ability to generate a wide range of waveforms for electronic warfare, air-to-air and air-to-ground operation. It also has the ability to operate in multiple air-to-air and air-to-ground modes simultaneously.

The AN/ALQ-218(V)2, developed by Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems, is a variant of the Improved Capabilities (ICAP) III system deployed on the US Navy's EA-6B Prowler aircraft. The system's antennas are located on the port and starboard sides of the nose, the engine bays, in the wingtip pods and to the aft of the cockpit, providing 360° azimuthal cover. The passive countermeasures system provides threat detection, identification and location.

The ALE-47 countermeasures dispenser supplied by BAE Systems Electronics and Integrated Systems in Austin, Texas, can be used with US and NATO radar and infrared decoys.

EA-18G Growler Electronic Attack Aircraft - Naval Technology
 
.
Technically i find it fascinating that a fast moving aircraft with its limited power supply is able to jam a ground radar station with much more juice.

Maybe some technical guy could elaborate.
 
.
Technically i find it fascinating that a fast moving aircraft with its limited power supply is able to jam a ground radar station with much more juice.

Maybe some technical guy could elaborate.
Define 'limited' in this situation. Anyway...There is a method where the seeking radar can overwhelm any jamming and it is called 'burn through'. The old MIG-25's radar was that powerful. Unfortunately, with 'burn through' any echo produced by the target will be so contaminated by the jamming signals that what are called 'target resolutions', such as speed, altitude, heading, aspect angle, and Doppler, are so poorly defined that the only thing 'burn through' can give is that there is <something> out there. That was what happened with the MIG-25. Its radar could only tell the pilot that there is an enemy but not where he is going, his altitude, and whether he is approaching or receding.
 
.
what air defense does libya have? i know of thier s-200, also why doesnt the us make more of these fighters? they seem very usefull.
 
.
How is that possible to face against AWACS since Libya doesn't have it.
 
.
Define 'limited' in this situation. Anyway...There is a method where the seeking radar can overwhelm any jamming and it is called 'burn through'. The old MIG-25's radar was that powerful. Unfortunately, with 'burn through' any echo produced by the target will be so contaminated by the jamming signals that what are called 'target resolutions', such as speed, altitude, heading, aspect angle, and Doppler, are so poorly defined that the only thing 'burn through' can give is that there is <something> out there. That was what happened with the MIG-25. Its radar could only tell the pilot that there is an enemy but not where he is going, his altitude, and whether he is approaching or receding.

I mean a ground station would have much more power aka electricity supply and equipment than a fast moving aircraft. So cant it just brute force or do something to the jamming signal ?. I mean sort of jamming the jammer.
 
.
I mean a ground station would have much more power aka electricity supply and equipment than a fast moving aircraft. So cant it just brute force or do something to the jamming signal ?. I mean sort of jamming the jammer.

It is not just the output of a transmitting station. All the aircraft has to do is exceed the reflected energy that the ground-based station is receiving from the much powerful pulse that it originally emitted.
 
.
It is not just the output of a transmitting station. All the aircraft has to do is exceed the reflected energy that the ground-based station is receiving from the much powerful pulse that it originally emitted.

Ok. I barely passed physics in school and college.lol

Anyway cant anything be done about these electronic warfare aircraft.I mean instead of originating from the sky cant be electronic warfare be originated from the ground.

Some brute force radar waves, microwaves or some sort of EMP to keep the skies clear electronically.
 
.
Ok. I barely passed physics in school and college.lol

Anyway cant anything be done about these electronic warfare aircraft.I mean instead of originating from the sky cant be electronic warfare be originated from the ground.

Some brute force radar waves, microwaves or some sort of EMP to keep the skies clear electronically.

It can be done, but it requires a lot of specialized know-how and equipment, and even then, for carefully defined situations to be effective.
 
.
Wow...awesome!!! What next? Dont be surprised if you see optimus prime in Libya. :lol:
 
.
What's Next in National Security All posts tagged &#8216;Next Generation Jammer&#8217;
New Navy Jammer Could Invade Networks, Nuke Sites
By David Axe January 21, 2011


"The frontline weapon for this electronic war is a new airborne jamming system currently in development. The Next Generation Jammer should allow the Navy to blind the enemy&#8217;s radars, disrupt its communications and slip malicious code into computer networks."

[url=http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/tag/next-generation-jammer/]Next Generation Jammer | Danger Room | Wired.com[/URL]
 
.
i think anti radistion missiles should do the job...a SAM homing intl the source of transmission.
the jamming station has to transmit continuously..guiding the SAM towards itself???
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom