Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The air combat ratio loss was at least 14-1 with the MIGs = 14.Is that what American propaganda told you?
Anything to hide American humiliation I guess
I suppose it's much better to say you lost to trained Soviet pilots than losing to untrained Chinese pilots right?
The Soviets flew planes that had Chinese or North Korean markings and were initially forbidden from speaking in Russian over the airwaves,[1] but the ban was soon lifted due to obvious problems of using Korean to communicate in critical battle situations.[2]
Is that what Chinese propaganda told you? I guess some lies must be created since the PLA have not done anything significant since the Korean War, other than run over unarmed students with tanks.I mean it's bad enough losing to a Chinese volunteer army armed with sticks and stones, but the best trained US pilots getting shot down by untrained Chinese pilots? That's even harder to swallow for the bruised and humiliated American ego
Is that what American propaganda told you?
Anything to hide American humiliation I guess
I suppose it's much better to say you lost to trained Soviet pilots than losing to untrained Chinese pilots right?
I mean it's bad enough losing to a Chinese volunteer army armed with sticks and stones, but the best trained US pilots getting shot down by untrained Chinese pilots? That's even harder to swallow for the bruised and humiliated American ego
This is exactly what I was waiting for. Once you have to resort to this, everyone know the Chinese crowd is out of credible arguments. But it does not take long for you guys to resort to this anyway. You have no experience. You are all conscript rejects. What else can you do?He was an illegal alien from Vietnam, and always got looked down by the white Anglo-Saxons.
Read again. I translate that sentence to our meaning...Looks like your government disagrees with you with their clear declaration below.
"We reiterate that the purpose of China's approach is to defend national sovereignty and territorial airspace security, maintain the order of airspace flight, and is an effective exercise of our right of self defence," defence ministry spokesman Yang Yujun said in a statement.
Airlines 'must warn China' of flight plans over disputed islands | World news | theguardian.com
Give me a general review of it. I do not have the time to read everything.No beef. I am a proponent of it. And if you want to learn, just go over to the Chinese defense sub-forum here. There is much to learn and you will thank me for it.
This is exactly what I was waiting for. Once you have to resort to this, everyone know the Chinese crowd is out of credible arguments. But it does not take long for you guys to resort to this anyway. You have no experience. You are all conscript rejects. What else can you do?
There are no accepted agreements on the creation of any ADIZ by any country regarding the CONTENTS of the rules that the ADIZ is supposed to enforce.Read again. I translate that sentence to our meaning...
The purpose of setting an ADIZ is to protect our territorial airspace security (12 nautical miles from shore) by preventing foreign airplane from accidentally and/or intentionally heading toward our territorial airspace. If we did not have a warning system in place ahead of time, we would not know what is the intention of any aircraft or airplane approaching our border. Now do you understand?
Give me a general review of it. I do not have the time to read everything.
Essentially, China is making no distinction between peaceful transit through an airspace that is shared by many who uses the same air corridor versus a genuinely unknown aircraft with unknown intentions.China’s Aircraft Identification Rules make no distinction between aircraft flying parallel with China’s coastline through the ADIZ and those flying toward China’s territorial airspace.
Worse. You are a loser. You are on a military oriented forum but instead of realizing your place, which is an ignoramus about things military, you resort to cheap personal and racist attacks befitting your people and how they are raised. Congratulations.Am i wrong?
More like too lazy.Give me a general review of it. I do not have the time to read everything.
Worse. You are a loser. You are on a military oriented forum but instead of realizing your place, which is an ignoramus about things military, you resort to cheap personal and racist attacks befitting your people and how they are raised. Congratulations.
Truth? Do I deny that I am a Vietnamese-American? People here know that looooooong before you guys showed your racist selves here.No Gambo, you are the real loser, since you are the guy who refuses to face the reality.
When i talked the truth, you just get upset. You have a fragile mind, and i think you must have faced a lot of discrimination in your life experience, lol.
Our government already stated that known flights that routinely fly in the zone will not be affect by the zone. As far as making the distinction, it was clear we will monitor and respond when we deem that unknown aircraft without known intention heading towards our territorial airspace.There are no accepted agreements on the creation of any ADIZ by any country regarding the CONTENTS of the rules that the ADIZ is supposed to enforce.
Here is the reason why China's ADIZ rules alarmed the region...
China's Air Defense Identification Zone: Impact on Regional Security | Center for Strategic and International Studies
Essentially, China is making no distinction between peaceful transit through an airspace that is shared by many who uses the same air corridor versus a genuinely unknown aircraft with unknown intentions.
More like too lazy.
Yeah...Debunked many times here already.Many members pointing fingers on Chinese Air defense Capabilities. Exploiters Hold on, few years back a Chinese Submarine approached US Aircraft carrier undetected. what about that?
So you mean no need to do anything if unidentified object isnt heading to your mainland(?) or the disputed land ???Our government already stated that known flights that routinely fly in the zone will not be affect by the zone. As far as making the distinction, it was clear we will monitor and respond when we deem that unknown aircraft without known intention heading towards our territorial airspace.
YES, you got a brain!Why didn't Chinese govt NOT understanding that their aggressive behaviour is making every neighbour to setup military power. In long term that will actually be a problem for China.
Mean while this is only going to help Japanese leadership.
Fine by me.
So you mean no need to do anything if unidentified object isnt heading to your mainland(?) or the disputed land ???