WinterNights
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2018
- Messages
- 1,222
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
LAME EXCUSES alert.
Iraq wasn't a military juggernaut when it invaded Iran in 1980 but a mediocre military power at the time; logistics problems, poor Air Force, and modest Iranian resistance efforts - these 3 factors collectively ensured failure of Iraqi armed forces to reach Tehran let alone pulling off 'regime change' in Iran. In fact, Iranian armed forces succeeded at ousting Iraqi armed forces by 1982.
Iraq began to receive funds and equipment from foreign entities after 1982 when it was on the receiving-end of Iranian counter-aggression. It would still take several years to refine and improve armed forces to the extent that they would be able to decisively defeat Iranian armed forces in the battlefield by 1988 (Operation Forty Stars and Tawakalna ala Allah Operations).
This part of your post is just ghiberish and in no way counters anything I said,
In fact, even in a span of 6 straight years while attacking Iraq (1982 - 1988), Iranian armed forces failed to reach even Basra.
Iran's main objective was to counter the Iraqi invasion which it did just fine.
Talk big when YOU accomplish something big in the battlefield and much of the world take notes - true in the case of US actually. Being HUMBLE is a VIRTUE regardless.
Getting it's behind handed to it is nothing too big. They're humble because they ate the humble pie.
If the existing Iranian regime collapse, these proxies will also loose their primary source of funding and fall apart.
If it collapses. We can talk about many ifs. What if the us actually gets the balls to attack? both scenarios are equally unlikely.
Being objective is not the same as licking the behind of Americans, you feeb. You should try to misbehave with people in person very often and see what happens.
You're a buttlicker. You have slave mentality.
As for misbehaving in person, I would slap you silly in real life.