What's new

Type 052D DDG revealed

2wghe11.jpg


20j0dxf.jpg
 
. . . . .
hehe,thanks for ur "sobriety". but for the moment we want a revelry.

we are not proud just for 052D. it is the development which PLAN showing us that exciting us.

15 years ago,we cant imagine VLS,AESA and many other equipments can be equiped with PLA.

those days we only had old soviet submarine R class, old type destroyer 051 whose tonnage is around 3000~4000 and other ships.in those days PLAN were just coast guards.

but now,we can design and build our own ship with Agis system.it's like an evolution from primitive society to modern society.that is what we enjoy.15 years ago,everyone would be frustrated by PLAN. but now we see hope on PLAN. that is quite different. we know we still have a long way to go,But the way is wide and straight and clear.
That is good that YOU recognize that militarily speaking, China still has a long way to go, but do you really think that five years is that 'long way' for the PLAN to match the USN as posited by one of yours...

Build To Order: One Aircraft Carrier Here's why it takes more than seven years to make the world's most complicated manufactured product. - July 22, 2002
...around 40 million skilled-worker hours, battalions of engineers, and over seven years of hard work.
Seven years to build a Nimitz class aircraft carrier. No one set the standard for what is a 'Nimitz class' ship. Not US. We never told any navy anywhere that there is such a thing. We just simply say the 'Nimitz class' is so-and-so specifications and applicable to US.

Within five years the Chinese Navy would possess carrier battle groups that are second to none to the United States' carrier battle groups.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/chinese-defence/204225-type-052d-ddg-revealed-9.html#ixzz24reBASvV
So how could anyone reconcile that silly claim?
 
.
Deleted to pages of Personal attacks and mudslinging if it happens again it's a infraction, warning to all members.
 
. .
That is good that YOU recognize that militarily speaking, China still has a long way to go, but do you really think that five years is that 'long way' for the PLAN to match the USN as posited by one of yours...

Build To Order: One Aircraft Carrier Here's why it takes more than seven years to make the world's most complicated manufactured product. - July 22, 2002

Seven years to build a Nimitz class aircraft carrier. No one set the standard for what is a 'Nimitz class' ship. Not US. We never told any navy anywhere that there is such a thing. We just simply say the 'Nimitz class' is so-and-so specifications and applicable to US.


So how could anyone reconcile that silly claim?

Do you know what <<second to none>> means?

It takes several YEARS to construct an aircraft carrier.

Build To Order: One Aircraft Carrier Here's why it takes more than seven years to make the world's most complicated manufactured product. - July 22, 2002

Then it takes YEARS to refuel...

Not only that, China does not have even 1/10th the aircraft carrier experience compared to India or France or Great Britain or even Brazil.

Dream on...

China started on its indigenous carriers in 2008. Which means that if they are built according to your timeline then they will be launched in 2015, which would be two years AHEAD of the schedule I posted. :rolleyes:
 
.
We are still looking for some test targets for our submarines.
What do you think, can your warship toy withstand SS-N-27 Sizzler antiship missile?
 
.
A total of 24 of these babies will built in 3 batches numbering 7&#12289;8 and 9. :cheers:
 
.
The world economy is and will likely remain in deep sh1t for the next few years&#65292;and the shipbuilding industry in particular is under a heavy pile of sh1t&#12290;China might as well make the best use of this downturn and have her shipyards busy with building naval assets&#65292;thereby shortening the time required for PLAN's modernization&#12289;expediting technological innovation and stimulating domestic demand&#12290;:cheers:
 
. .
will it be able to launch the ship launched DH-10 cruise missile?

The new all-purpose VLS has no problem launching the DH-10s&#65292;but the main role of 052D is air-defence&#65292;a task which will be jointly carried out with the 055s which will have vertically launched DH-10s for land attacks and HQ-26s for anti-ballistic missile roles&#12290;
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom