What's new

Two Nation Theory 2.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Two Nation Theory shall remain valid till the end of time ,
Pakistan and india have nothing in common
 
.
two writers from Pakistan wrote in Bangladeshi newspaper about why most people in Pakistan do not care about war criminals in1971 and about 1971 war. They pointed to education system in Pakistan, in school students learn few about Bangladesh when they study Pakistan's history , they are taught that Bangladesh is being divided by hindu people. They said that as long as Pakistan do not take responsibility of what they have done , then today's situation in Baluchistan can not be solved. They said it is necessary to learn true history, take responsibility and learn from mistake for prosperity of Pakistan.
 
.
What does anything you said about shahbahg, hindus and hindutva have to do with the article written in a pakistani newspaper by a pakistani muslim writer ?

@KS;
What you read was simply an inveterate, knee-jerk, comprehension-challenged reaction! This was the subject of research by Pavlov.

What instigated it was some key stmulii: TNT, 1971, Bay of Bengal, Shia-Sunni divide, Shia exodus, Takfiri Deobandi and similar key words.

Even the reaction was pro-forma by default: Hindu, Shahbagh, Hindutva goons etc.

In the face of that how does it matter that reaction was completely irrelevant.

On another thread @muse said: Indians think that Pakistanis are from Mars (not quite from Mars but there about).

@muse; please will you forgive if I now start thinking on those lines? :)

p.s.I did not do so until now, muse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
Can anyone tell me what is Takfiri.

Takfir is to adjudge who is muslim and who is not. In common parlance, especially of recent, Takfiri refers to those believers who declare other muslims as kafir/apostates, and is often used as a derogatory term to encompass certain schools of thought, sects and its adherents which justify their bigoted attitude through extremist interpretations of scripture and hadith.

For historical perspective, read about Khawarij rebels who rejected Hazrat Ali's leadership and started the whole poison of sectarianism you see today.
 
.
oh man the idiots never stops .

now go have tight sleep

The Hindus efforts to do away with the reality is not yelding any result.
wake up another shabagh is going on and thus spitting on faces of Hindutva goons

And you are PDF veteran,

You need to see a vet for your problems.
 
.
two writers from Pakistan wrote in Bangladeshi newspaper about why most people in Pakistan do not care about war criminals in1971 and about 1971 war. They pointed to education system in Pakistan, in school students learn few about Bangladesh when they study Pakistan's history , they are taught that Bangladesh is being divided by hindu people. They said that as long as Pakistan do not take responsibility of what they have done , then today's situation in Baluchistan can not be solved. They said it is need to necessary to learn true history, take responsibility and learn from mistake for prosperity of Pakistan.

Pakistani history? You don't seem to know they history is not taught in Pakistani schools as it is done in "normal" countries. Instead of history they are taught mutala e Pakistan which was created by the psychopathic rulers like Zia. Mutala e Pakistan is full of weird events occurred in present day India, and they also teach them about the great Muslim warriors like Tipu Sultan although hardly any Pakistani can pinpoint his little kingdom in any map , and they are also taught about world renown people like jhansi ki rani, bengal ka tiger and lacknow ka nawab. No Pashton kid can tell you anything about the war the Yusufzais fought against the tyrant Akbar, it was a long and bloody war in which one of Akbar's famous noratan Beerbal was killed. But Akbar is presented as a true Muslim warrior who ruled over Hindus, therefore this war against the lowly Yusufzais cannot be mentioned in mutala e Pakistan.
 
.
@Porus Mutala-E-Pakistan covers some Events in India even after independence ( i mean apart from kashmir and Bangladesh) .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Pakistani history? You don't seem to know they history is not taught in Pakistani schools as it is done in "normal" countries. Instead of history they are taught mutala e Pakistan which was created by the psychopathic rulers like Zia. Mutala e Pakistan is full of weird events occurred in present day India, and they also teach them about the great Muslim warriors like Tipu Sultan although hardly any Pakistani can pinpoint his little kingdom in any map , and they are also taught about world renown people like jhansi ki rani, bengal ka tiger and lacknow ka nawab. No Pashton kid can tell you anything about the war the Yusufzais fought against the tyrant Akbar, it was a long and bloody war in which one of Akbar's famous noratan Beerbal was killed. But Akbar is presented as a true Muslim warrior who ruled over Hindus, therefore this war against the lowly Yusufzais cannot be mentioned in mutala e Pakistan.

Before partition all the evil was because of Hindu banyas and Firangees, after Partition it's Evil Punjabies.
 
.
Pakistani history? You don't seem to know they history is not taught in Pakistani schools as it is done in "normal" countries. Instead of history they are taught mutala e Pakistan which was created by the psychopathic rulers like Zia. Mutala e Pakistan is full of weird events occurred in present day India, and they also teach them about the great Muslim warriors like Tipu Sultan although hardly any Pakistani can pinpoint his little kingdom in any map , and they are also taught about world renown people like jhansi ki rani, bengal ka tiger and lacknow ka nawab. No Pashton kid can tell you anything about the war the Yusufzais fought against the tyrant Akbar, it was a long and bloody war in which one of Akbar's famous noratan Beerbal was killed. But Akbar is presented as a true Muslim warrior who ruled over Hindus, therefore this war against the lowly Yusufzais cannot be mentioned in mutala e Pakistan.

i do not know much about Pakistan's internal issue , i just told you what they said
 
.
Pakistan was never unified in a way India was unified...India is more diverse than pakistan in all aspects....
Pakistan has always been in self destruction mode since it's creation....I just wish this destruction does not take more lives than it already has claimed...
 
.
Two nation theory was perhaps one of the most flawed theory used by politicians to achieve their self serving ends..in this case create a nation where they will be forever immortalized.

Once you sow the seeds of hatred for anything that is "different" ie. that two human beings can not live together or form a nation, just because they are different, they eat different food, pray to different gods, have different customs.

It is just a stepping stone for people further being divided based on language, sect, ethnicity, race.

It is a slow poison which will eat away through a nation..as Pakistan is learning the hard way.

If two hundreds of years of British rule in which a hand full of British repeatedly used their trade mark "divide and rule" policy to conquer the entire subcontinent could have taught anything, it is that unity irrespective of cast, creed , religion, sect, language is the only way forward.
 
.
The bases of original Jinnah's theory on two nations is Hindus and Muslims cannot co exist. But he never once might have though that Muslims themselves cannot co exit. It was proved in 1971, and again proving to be true in case of Shias, Hazaras, and Pashtuns. Hope Pakistanis realize their folly before it is too late

Too late for what? It was too late the day bigotry formed the ideal for a theory of nationhood.
 
.
I can see it as Two Nation Theory 3.0

1.0 was in 1947
2.0 was in 1972
3.0 ????

greater pakistan :azn:

local-f9e82f038a3a2b481dbf744c07c7c0c8.jpg
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom