Two Iranian fighters killed in Syria: Iranian agencies

[The SiLent crY]

The obsulte wilayet al faqih is against shiasm that's why many shia ullama refused it and refused to take this position after khomeini's death

You have any better option ?

 

[Abii]

Best case scenario: for every killed Mullah agent, 100 jihadi rats are killed as well. Win-win. Both sides dying prematurely is what we need. But since there are more jihadi sunnis compared to shia mullah agents, a nice ratio needs to be maintained.

1:100 is a good ratio.

This Syrian civil war has been a very fruitful war. Jihadi rats dying on every side.

 

[ultron]

Martyrdom is revered in the Shia tradition. Hamza was martyred. Muhammed (PBUH) was martyred. Umar was martyred. Uthman was martyred. Imam Ali was martyred. Imam Hussein and Abbas were martyred.

 

[Rasengan]

These Mongols killed the khalifa the drunken bastard coward with his family and killed his entire army

The burning of Baghdad was one of the greatest tragedies of this world, therefore mind your manners and learn to respect the dead even if you disagree with there actions. Otherwise my language on previous Shia rulers would become extreme in response.

 

[SALMAN F]

The burning of Baghdad was one of the greatest tragedies of this world, therefore mind your manners and learn to respect the dead even if you disagree with there actions. Otherwise my language on previous Shia rulers would become extreme in response.

He is the reason because he was lazy who was busy with his jawari.
There is no evidence that the Mongols did that some say that the people in Baghdad did that.

Best case scenario: for every killed Mullah agent, 100 jihadi rats are killed as well. Win-win. Both sides dying prematurely is what we need. But since there are more jihadi sunnis compared to shia mullah agents, a nice ratio needs to be maintained.

1:100 is a good ratio.

This Syrian civil war has been a very fruitful war. Jihadi rats dying on every side.

Yes but the syrian people are the victims their land being used for international conflicts

 

[Safavid]

RIP brothers.

 

[Rasengan]

He is the reason because he was lazy who was busy with his jawari.
There is no evidence that the Mongols did that some say that the people in Baghdad did that.

Al-Musta'sim can be considered an incompetent ruler who should have focused on strengthening his army rather than trusting the defenses of his fortress. However under no circumstances was he a bastard and insulting someone with such a term is undignified. although we can criticize there faults. Unfortunately the conquest of China by Kublai Khan allowed Hulagu Khan to gain access to siege engineers who had the capability to overcome the defenses of Baghdad.

The Mongols destroyed Baghdad because there culture revolved around decimating the enemy who rejected there terms of surrender before any city was besieged. The only ruler to go against this tradition was Kublai Khan and this only occurred because his advisers were Confucius scholars who influenced him to show mercy, by the time the Southern Song dynasty was conquered. Hulago Khan's mother and favorite wife were devout Christians who played a massive role in influencing his choices, therefore his policies towards the west who despised Islam was positive in nature. Either way the loss of Baghdad was tragic because it was the academic center of the world.