Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Need I mention '71 ?
That 'past history' too is our narrative of events against yours & the clout our respective countries have had to propagate that !
No not apple & oranges ! The Mukhti Bahini weren't a figment of my imagination nor was Agartalla Conspiracy something that I dreamt up !
Ghar mee haar kaar araam nai aya ? lol
Maybe Indians trying to avoid playing Pakistan since they will get more beatings.
Let me just sum up . Indian post was attacked inside India. They were killed than we had so much time to cut heads of soldiers and beating others. Were was Indian defence ? full time topi drama
Need I mention '71 ?
That 'past history' too is our narrative of events against yours & the clout our respective countries have had to propagate that !
I am persuaded that indian army beheaded its own soldier to malign Pakistan. It is just the kind of thing indian army would do because they want an excuse to wage war against Pakistan.Of course, anything is possible. But in situations like this, the question one has to ask is what is probable. Or, what is MORE probable.
What is more probable, that Indian soldiers would mutilate their colleagues' bodies to malign thee pak army, or that a few rogue soldiers in the pak army would behead two Indian soldiers?
If it was the other way round too, what would a neutral person have concluded? If a pak armyman's body was brought back with the head missing, which of the two alternatives would be more probable? That a few rogue Indian soldiers beheaded him, or that his own colleagues mutilated his dead body to cast India in a bad light?
Asking for concrete evidence in cases like this is a non-starter. You cant expect to get any. In such cases, one has to ask the question I just raised. Which of the two sides story is MORE likely than the other.
Shameful coward act by pakistani soldiers. This provocation need reply
RIP...