lockh33d
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 596
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't think China copies at all. Let's take the J-11 for example, it has 3/4 of the original Su-27 taken out, thus it can't be considered as a "duplicate."
Let's now take a look at the high speed rail-system, it was initially a 200km/h tech package imported from Jap/Germany. Then the Chinese twisted it slightly and developed the world's first formally approved 350 km/h track system-That's a 75% increase over that was analyzed and imported. Is this considered "copying?" I would say not.
Now let's look at the J-10 and the upcoming J-XX, these are developments run by the Chinese themselves. This certainly, cannot be called duplicates.
I think Indian logic is flawed. Perhaps a little self-degradation might advance the race as a whole, if done so properly.
Let's now take a look at the high speed rail-system, it was initially a 200km/h tech package imported from Jap/Germany. Then the Chinese twisted it slightly and developed the world's first formally approved 350 km/h track system-That's a 75% increase over that was analyzed and imported. Is this considered "copying?" I would say not.
Now let's look at the J-10 and the upcoming J-XX, these are developments run by the Chinese themselves. This certainly, cannot be called duplicates.
I think Indian logic is flawed. Perhaps a little self-degradation might advance the race as a whole, if done so properly.