Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So powerful response of Cavusoglu! This is the response she deserved. Arrogant actions like that must be crushed with iron fist.
Well we all saw the reactions of some of the diplomats there representing poor and dependent countries which seem to have waited such a reaction against the arrogant politics of countries like France and the US. Turkey must not be a country which excuse me is letting to be fvcked in the *** in front of other diplomatic representatives on its own soil with arguments based on lies and speech full of provocation not only based on the "Armenian Genocide" propaganda but even regarding the PKK terrorist organization which is not a terrorist organization in some countries as we heard.In the diplomacy your power backs your rhetoric up, so what has been/will be gained with this rhetoric?
I think I understood what you are trying to say. So if we can't oppose the US maybe the only super power on earth militarily, economically, culturally, technologically and with human resource we must be quiet so they don't sanction us. Lets be realistic. When will Turkey be able to oppose the US or France economically? If ever possible it will be after many years and changes. Does that mean that when somebody is throwing lies we must be quiet?First of all, please keep it short to the point, (except this one) no time for each paragraph that sails to refere to multiple fields to be answered.
No power means no justice and order since the beginning of the community life of human nature for the elite to get away from anything unlike the rest just like in today's global order, you should have understood this already in this (ironically defence) forum (if not already in the real life) before typing the convention article (ironically written by the elite).
In diplomacy/brain, The power/muscle has many faces like economy, culture, technology, human resource etc. and the first one in the list is the military against the opponent, but (unless backed by those muscles) not hot speeches(words) that otherwise signal weakness not only to the current opponent but also rest of the world to hit harder you with real actions in return as seen after every hot speeches of the current government in foreign affairs. However, none works well unless national strategy and policy involved to lead the way.
To factually illustrate... Before/During and After the crisis in the North Iraq referendum, election propaganda in Netherlands and Germany, One minute, Armenian G-word recognition in countries, PKK-YPG terrorism, Syria, Agean sea, Russian jet shoting-down, FETÖ case, nowadays Med. Sea oil drills, Sudan and Libya and so on... Hot speeches only serve to touch public ego, and in the end nothing happens till the next opponent hit harder thanks to no national strategy/policy and hereby the weakness that has been globally shown.
To make it easier... No such things happen to USA or France but repetitively to Turkey is coincident?
That brings us back to the question:
- What has been/will be gained with this rhetoric?
Well we all saw the reactions of some of the diplomats there representing poor and dependent countries which seem to have waited such a reaction against the arrogant politics of countries like France and the US. Turkey must not be a country which excuse me is letting to be fvcked in the *** in front of other diplomatic representatives on its own soil with arguments based on lies and speech full of provocation not only based on the "Armenian Genocide" propaganda but even regarding the PKK terrorist organization which is not a terrorist organization in some countries as we heard.
There is nothing to do about the "Armenian Genocide" case. All those decisions are part of the internal affairs of the countries. That what really matters is the decision of the International Court of Justice which is not there because there is not any cases. We purposed to the Armenian side to form international commission that would investigate the case with unlimited access of both Armenian and Turkish archives in order to find out what really happened and the Turkish side promised that whatever the end result is Turkey will obey to the decision of the international court.Usually, political rhetoric does not translate into solid action -- especially the rhetoric is more aimed at domestic constituency rather than the sole purpose of international diplomacy.
Need more solid action, and less rhetoric. Most of the international relations must be unknown to the regular citizen. IR is just another level and must be mostly limited to those involved and highly knowledgeable.
Solid action and the result should be known by the citizens, not the way the state achieves the stated goals.
Interestingly, Turkey's trade has increased with all the countries that officially recognize the Armenian Genocide. In this case, regular people will only take the rhetoric as real, whereas ground reality betrays it.
If Tanju Özcan and those two would compete for the mayor of the same city, who would win?
Some hint:
''
Türkiye'de Kutuplaşmanın Boyutları Araştırması-2017
Bilgi Üniversitesi (5 Şubat 2018)
- Suriyeliler Ülkelerine Geri Gönderilmeli mi? “Evet” Diyenlerin Oranı (Suriye’deki savaş bittiğinde bütün Suriyeliler ülkelerine geri gönderilmelidir)
- AK Parti %83.2
- CHP %92.8
- HDP %75.9
- MHP %88.9
- İYİ Parti %94.9
Kaynak: https://goc.bilgi.edu.tr/media/uplo...erkezi-kutuplasmanin-boyutlari-2017-sunum.pdf
- Genel %86.2
''
https://www.keeptalkinggreece.com/2019/04/02/imamoglu-pontus-greek-dance-video/
Funny how people attack Erdogan for being Georgian while ignoring this.