Bismarck
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Messages
- 4,807
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
I heard hakan fidan fired
Your intelligence service chief?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I heard hakan fidan fired
I don't think "acquitted" is the right word. The Malta proceedings were halted due to lack of documentary evidence: Turks testified that documents were "stolen" from military archives.- NO INTERNATIONAL COURT has ever designated these tragic events as "genocide" as of today...The British convened the Malta Tribunals (1919-1921) to try 144 Ottoman officials for alleged crimes against armenians after WWI. ALL of the accused were acquitted...
Oh god not this life insurance BS again, how many Armenians made life insurance on American companies? And why would Ottoman goverment get the money anyway?I don't think "acquitted" is the right word. The Malta proceedings were halted due to lack of documentary evidence: Turks testified that documents were "stolen" from military archives.
However, I wonder if they were looking in the wrong places for evidence, since I read an account that the orders regarding the Armenians were handled through the parallel civil government, rather than through the military command.
There's no question that millions of Armenians died. There's no question that the Ottomans claimed credit for this - the core of the Ottoman argument to U.S. diplomats that U.S. life insurance companies who wrote policies for Armenians should pay the Ottoman government the proceeds was that the Ottoman had made sure there were no survivors: link. But the proof of who ordered what to whom was not uncovered and that halted prosecutions of the accused.
It's not "BS". Under the principle of escheat, the property of people who die without heirs or a will is transferred to the state.Oh god not this life insurance BS again, how many Armenians made life insurance on American companies? And why would Ottoman goverment get the money anyway?
Still, how much was the total number of people who had a insurance on a American institution that it was worth a ''genocide''?It's not "BS". Under the principle of escheat, the property of people who die without heirs or a will is transferred to the state.
You are the first person I've heard suggest that collecting Armenians' life insurance was the possible motivation for the Ottomans to kill them.Still, how much was the total number of people who had a insurance on a American institution that it was worth a ''genocide''?
Huh? Didnt you just post about it?You are the first person I've heard suggest that collecting Armenians' life insurance was the possible motivation for the Ottomans to kill them.
I'm not sure you want to use this. The crux of its argument is that in the absence of documentation proving genocidal intentions it has to be assumed Ottoman intentions were good. Yet proof of Ottoman ill-will towards Armenians is available from diplomatic, Turkish, and German military accounts, whereas proof of good intentions - like building new housing for relocated Armenians and having provisions and clothing available for their forced marches - is lacking.The link is for those who care honour of their past and anscestors and therefore want to prove it is only relocation of Ottoman armenians.
I'm not sure you want to use this. The crux of its argument is that in the absence of documentation proving genocidal intentions it has to be assumed Ottoman intentions were good. Yet proof of Ottoman ill-will towards Armenians is available from diplomatic, Turkish, and German military accounts, whereas proof of good intentions - like building new housing for relocated Armenians and having provisions and clothing available for their forced marches - is lacking.
I don't think "acquitted" is the right word. The Malta proceedings were halted due to lack of documentary evidence: Turks testified that documents were "stolen" from military archives.
However, I wonder if they were looking in the wrong places for evidence, since I read an account that the orders regarding the Armenians were handled through the parallel civil government, rather than through the military command.
There's no question that millions of Armenians died. There's no question that the Ottomans claimed credit for this - the core of the Ottoman argument to U.S. diplomats that U.S. life insurance companies who wrote policies for Armenians should pay the Ottoman government the proceeds was that the Ottoman had made sure there were no survivors: link. But the proof of who ordered what to whom was not uncovered and that halted prosecutions of the accused.
It is true that hundreds of thousands of innocent Armenians suffered under Ottoman flag. But called it millions is factually wrong. There were 1.5 million Armenians in ottoman Turkey by 1914. In 1922 this was 360 thousand. French, Russian and English authorities counted 850 thousand Armenian refugees. This means than 400 thousand Armenians died. In the same years, 2 million Muslims died. Everyone suffered, all big parties did horrible things. I think everybody must recognize that and mourn their dead together. But this genocide thing is still based on too much rumour and hear say, instead of facts.