What's new

Turkish Missile Programs


@ 26:00 He says " Daha yetenekli ve uzun menzilli sistemlerin yine türkiye'de yerli olarak üretilmesiyle ilgili geliştirilme projelerimiz de açıklanmaya hazır beklemekte."

He says we have more capable & long ranged ready systems to unveil...
 
.
@ 26:00 He says " Daha yetenekli ve uzun menzilli sistemlerin yine türkiye'de yerli olarak üretilmesiyle ilgili geliştirilme projelerimiz de açıklanmaya hazır beklemekte."

Burada Çinden alınacak füzeleri kastediyor olabilir. Çünkü cümlenin başında acil ihtiyaç kapsamında daha yetenekli ve uzun menzilli füzelerin alımından bahsetmiş. Bu füzelerin ortak üretimi kastediliyo olabalir. Bu da acaba Çin ile anlaşıldıda karar bazı sebeplerden dolayı bekletiliniyormu sorusunu doğuruyor. ?

Yerli olarak üretilmesi: Ortak üretim Füze, Radar veya Komuta kontrol sistemlerinin bir kısmının Türkiyede teknoloj, transferi ile yerli üretilmesini içeriyor.

Ama dediğin gibi sıfırdan bir projede kastediliyo olunabilinir ki o da zaten mevcudiyette



3uYVWDY.png


tuFN0o1.png


2JWRYP0.jpg


m98MeSV.png


7gP81xE.png


LZlE2cG.png


WMqD42H.png


FNwvsJi.png
 
Last edited:
.
@ 26:00 He says " Daha yetenekli ve uzun menzilli sistemlerin yine türkiye'de yerli olarak üretilmesiyle ilgili geliştirilme projelerimiz de açıklanmaya hazır beklemekte."

Burada Çinden alınacak füzeleri kastediyor tahminim. Çünkü cümlenin başında acil ihtiyaç kapsamında daha uzun menzilli alınacak füzelerin Türkiyede üretilmek şartıyla hazır bir şkeilde beklemekte diyor. Anladığım kadarıyla Çin ile anlaşmaya varılmış... bazı nedenlerden dolayı kararın açıklanması bekletiliyor.



3uYVWDY.png


tuFN0o1.png


2JWRYP0.jpg


m98MeSV.png


7gP81xE.png


LZlE2cG.png


WMqD42H.png


Zi6ZweD.jpg

He says "Yerli olarak üretilmesi ile ilgili geliştirilme projelerimiz de açıklanmaya hazır beklemekte."

But i think both of us are right... We already know there are more advanced and long ranged projects other then YILDIRIM... When it comes to chinese systems, yes it is most probably ok too...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

ROKETSAN official says there will be atleast 4 different kind of SOM...

BTW guys what's this ?.. @cabatli_53 @Combat-Master

8.jpg


And here NSM launcher... Is that missile an NSM?..

NSM Füzesi İçin Lançer Üretimi « Roketsan

1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
7.jpg
 
Last edited:
. . . . . .
Will be hard to compete . Go Türkiye. Go.

Nammo AS - Rocket Motors


Missile Products Division at Raufoss
Missile Products Division has developed and produced advanced Rocket Motors, primarily for the NATO market since the early 1960's. Our main niches within tactical propulsion technologies are Rocket Motors for short-range Air-to-Air missiles and Boosters for medium to large size Naval missiles as well as Separation & Acceleration Boosters for Space applications. Some of these rocket motors also have a lightweight and high performance Thrust Vector Control (TVC) system based on Nammo’s in-house technology.
Missile Products Division is responsible for the Rocket Motor design/production in the following programs:
  • AMRAAM (Advanced Medium Range Air to Air Missile)
  • ESSM (Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile) – Raytheon
  • IRIS-T (Air to Air Missile with TVC) – Diehl BGT Defence
  • IRIS-T SL (Surface Lauch IRIS-T with TVC) – Diehl BGT Defence
  • EXOCET MM40 B3 Booster (Anti-Ship Missile with TVC) - MBDA
  • Sidewinder AIM-9L (Air to Air Missile) – Diehl BGT Defence
  • Penguin MK2 Boost & Sustain Motor Anti Ship Missiles) - Kongsberg
  • NSM Booster (Naval Strike Missile) - Kongsberg
  • IDAS (Interactive Defence & Attack for Submarines) – Diehl BGT Defence
  • ARIANE 5 (Separation & Acceleration Boosters) – Airbus DS
  • Hybrid Rocket Motors & Monopropellant Thrusters for Space - ESA
Rocket Motors from Nammo Talley in the US
The rocket motor and catapult product line at Nammo Talley consists of various types and sizes of specialized solid propellant rocket motors and catapults.
 
Last edited:
.
ASELSAN Solution Missile for Polands Short Range Air Defence Missile System


GglNjrq.jpg


KLcE13R.jpg


ASELSAN Polonya İle İşbirliğini Geliştiriyor | Haberler | Basın Odası | ASELSAN


It looks like RF-guided Hisar to be used for both AA and SAM roles similar to Amraam, offered to Poland as a SAM variant similar to NASSM.

He says "Yerli olarak üretilmesi ile ilgili geliştirilme projelerimiz de açıklanmaya hazır beklemekte."

But i think both of us are right... We already know there are more advanced and long ranged projects other then YILDIRIM... When it comes to chinese systems, yes it is most probably ok too...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

ROKETSAN official says there will be atleast 4 different kind of SOM...

BTW guys what's this ?.. @cabatli_53 @Combat-Master

View attachment 253788

And here NSM launcher... Is that missile an NSM?..

NSM Füzesi İçin Lançer Üretimi « Roketsan

View attachment 253789 View attachment 253790 View attachment 253791 View attachment 253792 View attachment 253793 View attachment 253794 View attachment 253795


It is the first time I have seen such a thing bro. Howitzer muhimmatı desem değil, füze desem o da değil... :D
 
. . .
Who knows? Maybe bro. But whatever they opt for I don't think it won't be any different than Mk141 canisters.

We heard that (and talked about it here also) our experts worked on MK141 lauchers on our ships... If i don't remember wrong our experts worked on size of MK141... If inner space of MK141 and this NSM launcher is same or both of them is avaliable for ATMACA IMO we can see a better launcher then MK141 for our ATMACAs... I mean this NSM launcher when i'm talking about 'better launcher' , if it's also being produced for ATMACA also... That's just my opinion... It can be wrong for sure...
 
Last edited:
.
We heard that (and talked about it here also) our experts worked on MK141 lauchers on our ships... If i don't remember wrong our experts worked on size of MK141... If inner space of MK141 and this NSM launcher is same or both of them is avaliable for ATMACA IMO we can see a better launcher then MK141 for our ATMACAs... I mean this NSM launcher when i'm talking about 'better launcher' , if it's also being produced for ATMACA also... That's just my opinion... It can be wrong for sure...

I see, its acceptable. But the launching canister is not a big deal to spend too much time on it. Flexible integration ease on different hull-sized platforms is enough :). The thing I wonder most would be whether there any UGM (submarine launch) variants..will they ever be integrated on currently active boats, Type 209 1200/1400.
 
.
It is the first time I have seen such a thing bro. Howitzer muhimmatı desem değil, füze desem o da değil... :D

Bro. if we look at the tip of it, it seems it has guidence, maybe it has laser guidence... Am i wrong ?..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom