Turkish MILGEM corvette arrives in Pakistan amid talks of potential export

[Penguin]

Meh I think I made you misunderstood my point. People always refer to have a VLS deployed but rather not specify the missile as Mk41 can employ various types of munitions ranging from VL-ASROC, Tomahawk to SAM missiles. Secondly I don't know the state of US relationship with Pakistan that may eventually lead to a blockade to prevent the platform sale.

I think my post amply demonstrates the VLSs ability to launch a variet of missiles. Whether it is the US Mk41 or the French Sylver. Or some other VLSs e.g. from China.

 

[HRK]

I think my post amply demonstrates the VLSs ability to launch a variet of missiles. Whether it is the US Mk41 or the French Sylver. Or some other VLSs e.g. from China.

We are developing our own system (most probably a VLS as other options are already available) which will support Land attack & Anti ship missile, target date of development is October 2018; confirmed by Ministry of Defence Production

 

[-------]

Any plans to further indigenize Turkish naval ships with having Turkish onboard radars, combat systems, and weapons package (including AAMs, surface attack missiles like harpoons etc?)

In the long run, Turks should aim to develop even the engine required for massive ships and aircrafts.

@cabatli_53

 

[Penguin]

We are developing our own system (most probably a VLS as other options are already available) which will support Land attack & Anti ship missile, target date of development is October 2018; confirmed by Ministry of Defence Production

To quote @Oscar, that would probably be an amalgem rather than a fully new domestic development from clean sheet, to keep cost low.

 

[Basel]

I believe the MBDA CAMM or Aster-15 could be options.

CAMM-ER from Italy will be more possible and better option, although South Africa also have new SAM in which PN seems to be interested.

http://www.mbda-systems.com/camm-solution/camm-er/

 

[HRK]

To quote @Oscar, that would probably be an amalgem rather than a fully new domestic development from clean sheet, to keep cost low.

actually bases already exist, all what are required to make that system compatible with seaborne requirements should be addressed now in this development phase .... (u can say this is my guesswork)

& yes I agree we act more like INTEGRATOR then INVENTOR to meet our existing & near future requirements