Empires are for men, civilisations is for cucks.
Are you going to spend time debating philosophy or are you going take concubines like the Alpha Male Nomad!!!
Turkish Geopolitics/ Foreign Affairs
- Thread starter Neptune
- Start date
Empires are for men, civilisations is for cucks.
Are you going to spend time debating philosophy or are you going take concubines like the Alpha Male Nomad!!!
Indeed I love seeing these so called master race civilisation cucks cry about how the Nomads conquered.
Not so superior anymore am I right hahaha
Exclusive: Turkey holds up NATO military plans over Syria dispute - sources
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...lans-over-syria-dispute-sources-idUSKBN1Y01W0
Finally. Make them understand that pissing on our national security has its consequences. Lets hope that russia takes the balticum.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...lans-over-syria-dispute-sources-idUSKBN1Y01W0
Finally. Make them understand that pissing on our national security has its consequences. Lets hope that russia takes the balticum.
rajvoSa
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 872
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
and it worked judging by the statments after the metinings. France got steamrolled by other european NATO countries. Germany played a good role in countering French in this, as is UK. France almost since the begining of NATO played its own selfinterested game, I dunno how many remeber France's pulling out of NATO command and ordering European NATO HQ to move from Paris. European NATO countries understand that for keeping Mediterain see a NATO lake Turkey is the most important peace to that strategy. Also by US signaling lesser comitment for the defence of EU NATO states paired with blackmail over trade policies, they see Turkey future role more important. And if Turkey succedes to gain and increase its influence across <North Africa (Tunisa/Libya) it will make it even more influental in NATO, esspecially in eurpean NATO circles.
MKALE1
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2018
- Messages
- 568
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Türkiye'nin Libya gibi bir mesafeye operasyon yapma kapasitesi var mı? Bu kukla isyancılara bir operasyon yapılması gerekiyor aksi halde bunlar başımıza bela olacaklar. İzmir Trablus arası bin km, sürekli biz mi şaşıracagiz biraz da şaşırtalım.
Nurhak40
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2016
- Messages
- 430
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Aslında GNA tam bastırır iken biz de libyanı kıyılarına arada bir vur kaç operasyonlar yapmamız gerekiyor
rajvoSa
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 872
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
GlobalMillitary96
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,344
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Never forget that the Saudi's destroyed a historic Ottoman fortress right next to Mecca in order to build that clock tower..
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajyad_Fortress
I still think that they deserve a huge punishment for this. Just disgusting.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajyad_Fortress
I still think that they deserve a huge punishment for this. Just disgusting.
dani92
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2019
- Messages
- 1,216
- Reaction score
- -19
- Country
- Location
GlobalMillitary96
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,344
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
People calling for the destruction of historical structures are sick in the mind.
Major changes ahead in post-pandemic period
BY BURHANETTIN DURAN
COLUMNS
APR 08, 2020 12:05 AM GMT+3
A man wearing a face mask walks across the road in the Akihabara district of Tokyo, Tuesday, April 7, 2020. (AFP Photo)
The coronavirus pandemic is likely to bring many changes in the world, and nations should start getting ready for them
The biggest problem with the coronavirus isn’t the soaring number of confirmed cases or the lack of a vaccine or cure. That the virus keeps mutating and could hurt people even after making a full recovery is what really gets me. At the same time, we now know that the world needs to prepare for future pandemics – even if we defeat the coronavirus today. In other words, the current crisis will have long-term repercussions.
Although China and Germany have shown some signs of recovery, the likelihood of second and third waves of infection suggests that total normalization won’t happen overnight. We must be ready for restrictions, followed by some normalization, followed by fresh restrictions. Although many experts agree that the coronavirus pandemic will continue for some time, there is growing interest in the post-pandemic period.
In a recent opinion piece, former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger stressed the importance of preparation. He argues that humanity must get ready to transition into the post-coronavirus world, as it keeps fighting the virus. Talking about building the future against the backdrop of crisis management, Kissinger maintains that it won’t be enough for governments around the world to develop national responses alone. Instead, the former diplomat warns that failure to promote global cooperation will lead to the worst outcome for individual countries and the international community as a whole.
Building on the legacy of the Marshall Plan and the Manhattan Project, Kissinger urges the U.S. to take three steps: support the global fight against the coronavirus, help the world economy recover and uphold the principles of the liberal world order.
As the number of confirmed cases continues to rise all around the world and many European health care systems are crushed under the pandemic’s weight, some people might think that it is too early to prepare for the post-pandemic situation. However, it is already obvious that countries, which do not prepare for the prolonged pandemic’s aftermath are bound to suffer the consequences. To be clear, how humanity responds to the crisis itself largely charts their course for its aftermath.
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that countries, which have been confiscating each other’s medical supplies, won’t back down from an economic fight to the death. The ongoing oil price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia supports this view. The coronavirus pandemic is likely to impact the international system no less than the world wars. What remains unclear is whether the post-pandemic power struggle will lead to fresh conflicts.
Other people, including European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, realize that this dark tunnel could lead us somewhere really scary. Calling on European Union members to allocate additional funds to help pandemic-stricken nations recover from the resulting economic crisis, she recently made the case that a Marshall Plan was needed for Europe.
To be clear, the European leader’s push for a new Marshall Plan was hardly a coincidence. The coronavirus pandemic seriously discredited the idea of EU solidarity. It seems unlikely that the bloc will be able to keep going without undergoing certain changes after the pandemic. Italy and Spain have already voiced their frustration with the EU. “Solidarity between Europeans is a key principle of the EU treaties,” Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez wrote in several newspapers. “Without solidarity, there can be no cohesion; without cohesion, there will be disaffection and the credibility of the European project will be severely damaged.”
The idea of a European Marshall Plan makes perfect sense on paper. But who’s going to pay for it? The obvious candidates are the U.S., China and Germany. If U.S. President Donald Trump gets reelected in November, he probably won’t be interested in Kissinger’s proposal. If the Democratic presidential candidate wins, Washington could pursue global leadership anew. What remains unclear, however, is if the U.S. economy will be powerful enough (after an estimated 47 million Americans lose their jobs due to the coronavirus pandemic) to take the incoming president where he wants to go.
If China, the second candidate, were to make an effort to save Southern Europe’s devastated economy, that would be a full-blown push for global leadership. However, Beijing seems unlikely to devise such an audacious plan, so long as its economy is slowing down and failing to create sufficient jobs.
Finally, Germany would have to shoulder the EU’s entire burden if it were to implement something akin to the Marshall Plan as a European power. A financial burden without the benefit of political leadership, however, would stir controversy in German politics. To be honest, it is hard to say whether a German politician could rise to that challenge in the post-Merkel era.
Another potential outcome is a separation of the EU between Northern and Southern Europe. In this case, Germany would lead the Northwest and turn it into the new European Union. And the Southeast would look for a new direction in light of its rapprochement with China.
Turkey, which has immense experience in crisis management, needs to prepare for a post-pandemic world dominated by competition and conflict rather than international cooperation.
https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/columns/major-changes-ahead-in-post-pandemic-period
BY BURHANETTIN DURAN
COLUMNS
APR 08, 2020 12:05 AM GMT+3
A man wearing a face mask walks across the road in the Akihabara district of Tokyo, Tuesday, April 7, 2020. (AFP Photo)
The coronavirus pandemic is likely to bring many changes in the world, and nations should start getting ready for them
The biggest problem with the coronavirus isn’t the soaring number of confirmed cases or the lack of a vaccine or cure. That the virus keeps mutating and could hurt people even after making a full recovery is what really gets me. At the same time, we now know that the world needs to prepare for future pandemics – even if we defeat the coronavirus today. In other words, the current crisis will have long-term repercussions.
Although China and Germany have shown some signs of recovery, the likelihood of second and third waves of infection suggests that total normalization won’t happen overnight. We must be ready for restrictions, followed by some normalization, followed by fresh restrictions. Although many experts agree that the coronavirus pandemic will continue for some time, there is growing interest in the post-pandemic period.
In a recent opinion piece, former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger stressed the importance of preparation. He argues that humanity must get ready to transition into the post-coronavirus world, as it keeps fighting the virus. Talking about building the future against the backdrop of crisis management, Kissinger maintains that it won’t be enough for governments around the world to develop national responses alone. Instead, the former diplomat warns that failure to promote global cooperation will lead to the worst outcome for individual countries and the international community as a whole.
Building on the legacy of the Marshall Plan and the Manhattan Project, Kissinger urges the U.S. to take three steps: support the global fight against the coronavirus, help the world economy recover and uphold the principles of the liberal world order.
As the number of confirmed cases continues to rise all around the world and many European health care systems are crushed under the pandemic’s weight, some people might think that it is too early to prepare for the post-pandemic situation. However, it is already obvious that countries, which do not prepare for the prolonged pandemic’s aftermath are bound to suffer the consequences. To be clear, how humanity responds to the crisis itself largely charts their course for its aftermath.
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that countries, which have been confiscating each other’s medical supplies, won’t back down from an economic fight to the death. The ongoing oil price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia supports this view. The coronavirus pandemic is likely to impact the international system no less than the world wars. What remains unclear is whether the post-pandemic power struggle will lead to fresh conflicts.
Other people, including European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, realize that this dark tunnel could lead us somewhere really scary. Calling on European Union members to allocate additional funds to help pandemic-stricken nations recover from the resulting economic crisis, she recently made the case that a Marshall Plan was needed for Europe.
To be clear, the European leader’s push for a new Marshall Plan was hardly a coincidence. The coronavirus pandemic seriously discredited the idea of EU solidarity. It seems unlikely that the bloc will be able to keep going without undergoing certain changes after the pandemic. Italy and Spain have already voiced their frustration with the EU. “Solidarity between Europeans is a key principle of the EU treaties,” Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez wrote in several newspapers. “Without solidarity, there can be no cohesion; without cohesion, there will be disaffection and the credibility of the European project will be severely damaged.”
The idea of a European Marshall Plan makes perfect sense on paper. But who’s going to pay for it? The obvious candidates are the U.S., China and Germany. If U.S. President Donald Trump gets reelected in November, he probably won’t be interested in Kissinger’s proposal. If the Democratic presidential candidate wins, Washington could pursue global leadership anew. What remains unclear, however, is if the U.S. economy will be powerful enough (after an estimated 47 million Americans lose their jobs due to the coronavirus pandemic) to take the incoming president where he wants to go.
If China, the second candidate, were to make an effort to save Southern Europe’s devastated economy, that would be a full-blown push for global leadership. However, Beijing seems unlikely to devise such an audacious plan, so long as its economy is slowing down and failing to create sufficient jobs.
Finally, Germany would have to shoulder the EU’s entire burden if it were to implement something akin to the Marshall Plan as a European power. A financial burden without the benefit of political leadership, however, would stir controversy in German politics. To be honest, it is hard to say whether a German politician could rise to that challenge in the post-Merkel era.
Another potential outcome is a separation of the EU between Northern and Southern Europe. In this case, Germany would lead the Northwest and turn it into the new European Union. And the Southeast would look for a new direction in light of its rapprochement with China.
Turkey, which has immense experience in crisis management, needs to prepare for a post-pandemic world dominated by competition and conflict rather than international cooperation.
https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/columns/major-changes-ahead-in-post-pandemic-period
GlobalMillitary96
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,344
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Similar threads
