Balkar-Karachais do call themselves Alans and Ases, all their neighbors, including Ossetes, call them Alans and Ases, and nobody calls Ossetes Alans and Ases, including the Ossetes themselves.
No. This is not good answer . Y dna explain how their ancestors look like . But ıf presentday these people dont look like their ancestors that's mean is they were mixed with mongolid females. Still i say same thing. But still you dont understand that is your mind problem .
The genetic graphs demonstrate the spuriousness of theAltaic category, and its continued use in genetic research not only was failing to model an analyzable concept, but also tends to produce misleading results and superficial conclusions. Fortunately, the macro-Altaic category, heavily advocated in the past century, by now is pretty much discredited.
Graphs show what would happened after waves after waves of migrations would keep replacing their maternal mtDNA with the local mtDNA over and over again. Depending on particular circumstances would change the appearance of the migrants and the locals, their language even if not completely replaced, their traditions, and their culture. The male-driven economy, military aptitude, class structure, and social organization would be propagated.
Statistically, the vast majority of the population hold its genome and its haplogroup, that is, they marry their neighbors; offspring repeat the distribution of haplogroups of their ancestors: the dominant Y-DNA haplogroup of the fathers remains a dominant Y-DNA haplogroup of the sons, and the dominant mtDNA haplogroup of the mothers remains a dominant mtDNA haplogroup of the sons and daughters, with only daughters passing their mtDNA on.
The picture changes dramatically with replacement of the previous male population (hostile invasion). The dominant mtDNA haplogroup of the mothers remains a dominant mtDNA haplogroup of the sons and daughters, while the dominant Y-DNA haplogroup of the population is changing radically. Analysis of mtDNA does not catch such migratory changes due to the limited statistics.
@eastwatch If you want to learn turkish education sytem level. you have to compare turkey and bangladesh. Answer is there
How can you be related to those wonderful peoples when you don't have continuous history, meaning Kurdish history connecting with previous peoples you mentioned there. There is thousand of years of gaps between Medes people and Kurds. It sounds to me you are just making up history because you don't have history. Explain to me the timeline from the first ancient Kurd to today's Kurd. (with years)
I talked to a Kurdish barber who I trust and he said they can't understand each other. The dialects have nothing in common. It is just mishmash language.
Is that a statement or question? You first make something up and then put question mark behind it.
No, Circassians and Laz don't look the same. I don't know in which country you live but I know for sure you never been in Turkey and seen both Laz and Circassian peoples. Alans are not Iranic either. Alans have own history in that region. And saying "everybody agrees with this" where do you base that on? Wikipedia? Haha, you really haven't changed your attitude since your last account. This is just "greater Iran" bullshit as usual.
How can you be related to those wonderful peoples when you don't have continuous history, meaning Kurdish history connecting with previous peoples you mentioned there. There is thousand of years of gaps between Medes people and Kurds. It sounds to me you are just making up history because you don't have history. Explain to me the timeline from the first ancient Kurd to today's Kurd. (with years)
I talked to a Kurdish barber who I trust and he said they can't understand each other. The dialects have nothing in common. It is just mishmash language.
Is that a statement or question? You first make something up and then put question mark behind it.
Ne yapisirsa artik diye dusunuyor
Oh God friend, I honestly can not be bothered to lecture you in Kurdish history. It is a very controversial and disputed subject. And it is also true that very little is written of the Kurdish people prior to the 9th century. because the feudal Kurdish aristocracy typically worked for other empires and dynasties ( The Ayyubids and the Rawandids are good example of this) thus easily becoming integrated. Salahaddin Eyyubi is another good example. But the time of working for other countries is over now. That is history now. Now it is time to find the roots of the Kurds and some organisations and entities are doing a great job at this. 
I think he doesn't even speak Kurdish. He was not even aware of the dialects, and I also just found out he doesn't know anything about Kurdish history since I asked a timeline (with years) and he doesn't provide it. At least he admits that there were no records of Kurds before 1000 ad.
