What's new

Turkey President to visit India

in fact there is a reactor successfully tested based on FBR. it is LWBR and it first started service in 1977 in USA.

i really wonder the result of the meeting... lets wait and see :tup:

India’s fast breeder n-reactor achieves second milestone


CHENNAI - India’s first indigenously designed 500MW fast breeder nuclear power project at Kalpakkam achieved its second milestone when the huge main vessel was lowered into the safety vessel, an official said Sunday.

“We have been waiting to do this for quite sometime but were not permitted by the rain gods. As the sky was clear, we decided to go ahead with the lowering of the main vessel and completed it Saturday,” project director Prabhat Kumar told IANS from Kalpakkam in Tamil Nadu.

The Rs.5,600 crore project is being built by the Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam Limited (Bhavini) at the Kalpakkam nuclear enclave, around 80 km from here.

A fast breeder reactor is one which breeds more material for a nuclear fission reaction than it consumes and key to India’s three stage nuclear power programme.

Lowering of the huge stainless steel main vessel - 12.9 metres in diameter and 12.94 metres in height, weighing 206 tonnes - is considered a major step in completing the 500 MW power project by the September 2011 deadline.

The lowering of main vessel was delayed as civil construction works are on and the officials did not want to risk even a speck of dust inside the vessel that would hold the coolant liquid sodium, reactor fuel and grid plates.

The sodium-cooled fast reactor designed by the Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IGCAR) has three vessels - a safety vessel, a main vessel and an inner vessel.

Outermost is the stainless steel safety vessel, which was lowered into the reactor vault last June - the first milestone.

The third and smallest of the three vessels is the inner vessel - 11 metres tall. It houses pumps, heat exchangers and other equipment. Together, they all go inside the main vessel.

The cone-shaped inner vessel, thermal baffle, grid plate and primary pipes are also ready and officials expect the roof slab of the nuclear reactor to be closed by next March.

As for the power generation part of the project, erection of the gas-insulated switchyard is nearing completion and the gas filling process has begun.

Brother,

Only problem that i can see is Turkey's cosying up with Pakistan.

It should not become a obstacle in our friendship.

Because a friend of Pakistan can't be a true friend of India.
 
.
Mr. X,
i m really impressed and i see that india follows her own way on the path of using Thorium reserves. i think people in my country who disagree on using thorium fuel reactors should read all about this and they need to study on indian experience.
You know, before this option the only country who gave offer was russia. Turkey buys gas from russia and uses it to produce electiric. While we are so dependent on russia on energy field, it would be silly to give them the nuclear reactor construction job. So india became an alternative for us :) This will help us too much against russians and we will earn experience to be able to build our own plant...
i always thought that building a reactor can be possible with the present industrial capability and capacity of Turkey. what we needed was experience and long term strategies. Finally Indian example will be used.
honestly i didnt know if india had this capability. may be i underestimated you a little bit. What do you say Sir? :lol:
 
.
BTW, do you know?

Indian company GMR have constructed Istanbul Airport project

Times of India | New Delhi | 10 November 2009

High on the success of Hyderabad airport and with most of Delhi airport modernization set for completion before the Commonwealth Games, the GMR Group has notched up an international success as well. With the opening of a new terminal at Istanbul Sabiha (okam Jnternational Airport (ISCIA) on October31, it became the first Indian firm to operate an airport abroad

GMR bagged the contract on a build-operate-transfer (BOT) basis In partnership with Turkish company LI mak Holding and Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad Airports in July 2007 for a period of 20 years. It went on to complete the 18-month project three days ahead of schedule. Referring to a Turkish saying In his speech that two bands are more effective than one, GMR group chairman G M Rao said, “Three hands have broken a record; to work In Turkey Is a privilege.

At the Inauguration of the new terminal, civil aviation minister Praful Patel said, “With the opening of this terminal building a new era of relationship and economic partnership has begun. This has opened many more avenues for the Indian arid Turkish companies to join bands.” The facility was inaugurated by Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, The new terminal, built on the Asian side of the bi continental city, is expected to handle 25 million passengers annually

The new terminal building, built at a cost of Rs 4,000 crore, has been designed to handle an extra 20 million passengers as the old terminal building has become nearly full,” Rao said

The new terminal will have a four-storey car park with a capacity of 4,700 cars and 72 buses. It will have 112 cheek-in counters and a 124- room airport hotel adjacent to the terminal

Asked about Delhi airport, the GMR chairman said, “The terminal building would be ready by March31, 2010 but It will be commissioned only in July after Delhi Metro completes the Airport Express Line in June.
 
.
BTW, do you know?

Indian company GMR have constructed Istanbul Airport project

Times of India | New Delhi | 10 November 2009

High on the success of Hyderabad airport and with most of Delhi airport modernization set for completion before the Commonwealth Games, the GMR Group has notched up an international success as well. With the opening of a new terminal at Istanbul Sabiha (okam Jnternational Airport (ISCIA) on October31, it became the first Indian firm to operate an airport abroad

GMR bagged the contract on a build-operate-transfer (BOT) basis In partnership with Turkish company LI mak Holding and Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad Airports in July 2007 for a period of 20 years. It went on to complete the 18-month project three days ahead of schedule. Referring to a Turkish saying In his speech that two bands are more effective than one, GMR group chairman G M Rao said, “Three hands have broken a record; to work In Turkey Is a privilege.

At the Inauguration of the new terminal, civil aviation minister Praful Patel said, “With the opening of this terminal building a new era of relationship and economic partnership has begun. This has opened many more avenues for the Indian arid Turkish companies to join bands.” The facility was inaugurated by Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, The new terminal, built on the Asian side of the bi continental city, is expected to handle 25 million passengers annually

The new terminal building, built at a cost of Rs 4,000 crore, has been designed to handle an extra 20 million passengers as the old terminal building has become nearly full,” Rao said

The new terminal will have a four-storey car park with a capacity of 4,700 cars and 72 buses. It will have 112 cheek-in counters and a 124- room airport hotel adjacent to the terminal

Asked about Delhi airport, the GMR chairman said, “The terminal building would be ready by March31, 2010 but It will be commissioned only in July after Delhi Metro completes the Airport Express Line in June.


Yes they do it with Turkish Limak=) Sabiha Gokcen airport is a small one but they enlarge it. and i wish it wasnt so far for the people of istanbul=) usually domestic line passengers use it. But main airport is Ataturk and it is really huge =) Also its really useful, you can go there by metro and this is a great advantage :cheesy:
 
. .
Mr. X,
i m really impressed and i see that india follows her own way on the path of using Thorium reserves. i think people in my country who disagree on using thorium fuel reactors should read all about this and they need to study on indian experience.
You know, before this option the only country who gave offer was russia. Turkey buys gas from russia and uses it to produce electiric. While we are so dependent on russia on energy field, it would be silly to give them the nuclear reactor construction job. So india became an alternative for us :) This will help us too much against russians and we will earn experience to be able to build our own plant...
i always thought that building a reactor can be possible with the present industrial capability and capacity of Turkey. what we needed was experience and long term strategies. Finally Indian example will be used.
honestly i didnt know if india had this capability. may be i underestimated you a little bit. What do you say Sir? :lol:


India Developing Thorium Based Fast Breeder Nuclear Reactor

A team of scientists at a premier Indian nuclear facility has made a theoretical design of an innovative reactor that can run on thorium - available in abundance in the country - and will eventually do away with the need for uranium.

But the success of the project largely depends on the US playing ball. The novel Fast Thorium Breeder Reactor (FTBR) being developed by V. Jagannathan and his team at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Mumbai has received global attention after a paper was submitted to the International Conference on Emerging Nuclear Energy Systems (ICENES) held June 9-14 in Istanbul.

This was reported on NEWSPost India.

Power reactors of today mostly use a fissile fuel called uranium-235 (U-235), whose 'fission' releases energy and some 'spare' neutrons that maintain the chain reaction. But only seven out of 1,000 atoms of naturally occurring uranium are of this type. The rest are 'fertile', meaning they cannot fission but can be converted into fissionable plutonium by neutrons released by U-235.

Thorium, which occurs naturally, is another 'fertile' element that can be turned by neutrons into U-233, another uranium isotope. U-233 is the only other known fissionable material. It is also called the 'third fuel'.

Thorium is three times more abundant in the earth's crust than uranium but was never inducted into reactors because - unlike uranium - it has no fissionable atoms to start the chain reaction.

But once the world's uranium runs out, thorium - and the depleted uranium discharged by today's power reactors - could form the 'fertile base' for nuclear power generation, the BARC scientists claim in their paper.

They believe their FTBR is one such 'candidate' reactor that can produce energy from these two fertile materials with some help from fissile plutonium as a 'seed' to start the fire.

By using a judicious mix of 'seed' plutonium and fertile zones inside the core, the scientists show theoretically that their design can breed not one but two nuclear fuels - U-233 from thorium and plutonium from depleted uranium - within the same reactor.

This totally novel concept of fertile-to-fissile conversion has prompted its designers to christen their baby the Fast 'Twin' Breeder Reactor.

Their calculations show the sodium-cooled FTBR, while consuming 10.96 tonnes of plutonium to generate 1,000 MW of power, breeds 11.44 tonnes of plutonium and 0.88 tonnes of U-233 in a cycle length of two years.

According to the scientists, their FTBR design exploits the fact that U-233 is a better fissile material than plutonium. Secondly, they were able to maximise the breeding by putting the fertile materials inside the core rather than as a 'blanket' surrounding the core as done traditionally.

'At present, there are no internal fertile blankets or fissile breeding zones in power reactors operating in the world,' the paper claims.

The concept has won praise from nuclear experts elsewhere. 'Core heterogeneity is the best way to help high conversion,' says Alexis Nuttin, a French nuclear scientist at the LPSC Reactor Physics Group in Grenoble.

Thorium-based fuels and fuel cycles have been used in the past and are being developed in a few countries but are yet to be commercialised.

France is also studying a concept of 'molten salt reactor' where the fuel is in liquid form, while the US is considering a gas-cooled reactor using thorium. McLean, Virginia-based Thorium Power Ltd of the US, has been working with nuclear engineers and scientists of the Kurchatov Institute in Moscow for over a decade to develop designs that can be commercialised.

But BARC's FTBR is claimed to be the first design that truly exploits the concept of 'breeding' in a reactor that uses thorium. The handful of fast breeder reactors (FBRs) in the world today - including the one India is building in Kalpakkam near Chennai - use plutonium as fuel.

These breeders have to wait until enough plutonium is accumulated through reprocessing of spent fuel discharged by thermal power reactors that run on uranium.

Herein lies the rub.

India does not have sufficient uranium to build enough thermal reactors to produce the plutonium needed for more FBRs of the Kalpakkam type. The India-US civilian nuclear deal was expected to enable India import uranium and reprocess spent fuel to recover plutonium for its FBRs. But this deal has hit a roadblock.

'Jagannathan's design is one way of utilising thorium and circumventing the delays in building plutonium-based FBRs,' says former BARC director P.K. Iyengar.

Meanwhile, India's 300,000 tonnes of thorium reserves - the third largest in the world - in the beach sands of Kerala and Orissa states are waiting to be tapped. The BARC scientists say that thorium should be inducted into power reactors when the uranium is still available, rather than after it is exhausted.

But the FTBR still needs an initial inventory of plutonium to kick-start the thorium cycle and eventually to generate electricity. A blanket ban on India re-processing imported uranium - a condition for nuclear cooperation with the US - could make India's thorium programme a non-starter.

Iyengar has one suggestion that he says must be acceptable to the US if it is serious about helping India to solve its energy problem.

'The US and Russia have piles of plutonium from dismantled nuclear weapons,' Iyengar told IANS, adding: 'They should allow us to borrow this plutonium needed to start our breeders. We can return the material after we breed enough.'
 
.
India unveils 'world's safest nuclear reactor'

India [ Images ] unveiled before the international commuity Thursday its revolutionary design of 'A Thorium Breeder Reactor' that can produce 600 MW of electricity for two years 'with no refuelling and practically no control manoeuvres.'

Designed by scientists of the Mumbai-based Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, the ATBR is claimed to be far more economical and safer than any power reactor in the world.

Most significantly for India, ATBR does not require natural or enriched uranium which the country is finding difficult to import. It uses thorium -- which India has in plenty -- and only requires plutonium as 'seed' to ignite the reactor core initially.

Eventually, the ATBR can run entirely with thorium and fissile uranium-233 bred inside the reactor (or obtained externally by converting fertile thorium into fissile Uranium-233 by neutron bombardment).

BARC scientists V Jagannathan and Usha Pal revealed the ATBR design in their paper presented at the week-long 'international conference on emerging nuclear energy systems' in Brussels. The design has been in the making for over seven years.

According to the scientists, the ATBR while annually consuming 880 kg of plutonium for energy production from 'seed' rods, converts 1,100 kg of thorium into fissionable uranium-233. This diffrential gain in fissile formation makes ATBR a kind of thorium breeder.

The uniqueness of the ATBR design is that there is almost a perfect 'balance' between fissile depletion and production that allows in-bred U-233 to take part in energy generation thereby extending the core life to two years.

This does not happen in the present day power reactors because fissile depletion takes place much faster than production of new fissile ones.

BARC scientists say that "the ATBR with plutonium feed can be regarded as plutonium incinerator and it produces the intrinsically proliferation resistant U-233 for sustenance of the future reactor programme."

They say that long fuel cycle length of two years with no external absorber management or control manoeuvres "does not exist in any operating reactor."

The ATBR annually requires 2.2 tonnes of plutonium as 'seed'. Althouth India has facilities to recover plutonium by reprocessing spent fuel, it requires plutonium for its Fast Breeder Reactor programme as well. Nuclear analysts say that it may be possible for India to obtain plutonium from friendly countries wanting to dismantle their weapons or dispose of their stockpiled plutonium.
 
.
Yes brother i am facing the identity crisis because of you.

Even send a request to mods to look into this.

Never mind.

Now defense.pk have become double X :devil:

it will be a fun when we have triple X
 
.
In India, both Kakrapar-1 and -2 units are loaded with 500 kg of thorium fuel in order to improve their operation when newly-started. Kakrapar-1 was the first nuclear reactor in the world to use thorium, rather than depleted uranium, to achieve power flattening across the reactor core. In 1995, Kakrapar-1 achieved about 300 days of full power operation and Kakrapar-2 about 100 days utilizing thorium fuel. The use of thorium-based fuel is planned in Kaiga-1 and -2 and Rajasthan-3 and -4 reactors.

In India, the Kamini 30 kWth experimental neutron-source research reactor using 233U, recovered from ThO2 fuel irradiated in another reactor, started up in 1996 near Kalpakkam. The reactor was built adjacent to the 40 MWt Fast Breeder Test Reactor, in which the ThO2 is irradiated.

With about six times more thorium than uranium, India has made utilization of thorium for large-scale energy production a major goal in its nuclear power program, utilizing a three-stage concept:

Concepts for advanced nuclear power reactors based on thorium-fuel cycles include:

* Light Water Reactors (LWRs) - With fuel based on plutonium oxide (PuO2), thorium oxide (ThO2) and/or uranium oxide (UO2) particles arranged in fuel rods.
* High-Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGRs) of two kinds: pebble bed and with prismatic fuel elements.
* Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactors (GT-MHRs) - Research on HTGRs in the USA led to a concept using a prismatic fuel. The use of helium as a coolant at high temperature, and the relatively small power output per module (600 MWth), permit direct coupling of the MHR to a gas turbine (a Brayton cycle), resulting in generation at almost 50% thermal efficiency. The GT-MHR core can accommodate a wide range of fuel options, including HEU/Th, 233U/Th and Pu/Th. The use of HEU/Th fuel was demonstrated in the Fort St Vrain reacto.
* Pebble-Bed Modular Reactors (PBMRs) - Arising from German work, the PBMR was conceived in South Africa and is now being developed by a multinational consortium. It can potentially use thorium in its fuel pebbles.
* Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs) - This is an advanced breeder concept, in which the fuel is circulated in molten salt, without any external coolant in the core. The primary circuit runs through a heat exchanger, which transfers the heat from fission to a secondary salt circuit for steam generation. It was studied in depth in the 1960s, and is now being revived because of the availability of advanced technology for the materials and components.
* There is now renewed interest in the MSR concept in Japan, Russia, France and the USA, and one of the six generation IV designs selected for further development is the MSR. In 2002 a Thorium MSR was designed in France with a fissile zone where most power would be produced and a surrounding fertile zone where most conversion of Th-232 to U-233 would occur.
* Advanced Heavy Water Reactors (AHWRs) - India is working on this design, and like the Canadian CANDU-NG, the 250 MWe design is light water-cooled. The main part of the core is subcritical with Th/233U oxide, mixed so that the system is self-sustaining in 233U. A few seed regions with conventional MOX fuel will drive the reaction and give a negative void coefficient overall.
* Plutonium disposition - Today, MOX (U,Pu) fuels are used in some conventional nuclear reactors, with 239Pu providing the main fissile ingredient. An alternative is to use Th/Pu fuel, with plutonium being consumed and fissile 233U bred. The remaining 233U after separation could be used in a Th/U fuel cycle.

Use of thorium in Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS)

In an Accelerator Driven System (ADS), high-energy neutrons are produced through the spallation reaction of high-energy protons from an accelerator striking heavy target nuclei (lead, lead-bismuth or other material). These neutrons can be directed to a subcritical reactor containing thorium, where the neutrons breed 233U and promote the fission of it. There is therefore the possibility of sustaining a fission reaction which can readily be turned off, and used either for power generation or destruction of actinides resulting from the U/Pu fuel cycle. The use of thorium instead of uranium means that less actinides are produced in the ADS itself.
Developing a thorium-based fuel cycle

Despite the thorium fuel cycle having a number of attractive features, development even on the scale of India's has always run into difficulties.

The main attractive features are:
• the possibility of utilising a very abundant resource which has hitherto been of so little interest that it has never been quantified properly,
• the production of power with few long-lived transuranic elements in the waste,
• reduced radioactive wastes generally.

Problems include

• the high cost of fuel fabrication due partly to the high radioactivity of 233U chemically separated from the irradiated thorium fuel. Separated U-233 is always contaminated with traces of 232U (69 year half life but whose daughter products such as thallium-208 are strong gamma emitters with very short half lives);

• the similar problems in recycling thorium due to highly radioactive 228Th (an alpha emitter with two-year half life) present;

• the technical problems (not yet satisfactorily solved) in reprocessing solid fuels.

Much development work is still required before the thorium fuel cycle can be commercialized, and the effort required seems unlikely while (or where) abundant uranium is available. In this respect international moves to bring India into the ambit of international trade are critical. If India has ready access to traded uranium and conventional reactor designs, it may not persist with the thorium cycle.

Nevertheless, the thorium fuel cycle, with its potential for breeding fuel without the need for fast neutron reactors, holds considerable potential in the long-term. It is a key factor in the sustainability of nuclear energy.

* Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs), elsewhere known as CANDUs fuelled by natural uranium, plus light water reactors, produce plutonium;
* Fast Breeder Reactors (FBRs) use this plutonium-based fuel to breed 233U from thorium. The blanket around the core will have uranium as well as thorium, so that further plutonium (ideally high-fissile Pu) is produced as well as the 233U; and then
* Advanced Heavy Water Reactors (AHWRs) burn the 233U and this plutonium with thorium, getting about 75% of their power from the thorium.


The used fuel will then be reprocessed to recover fissile materials for recycling.

This Indian program has moved from aiming to be sustained simply with thorium to one "driven" with the addition of further fissile uranium and plutonium, to give greater efficiency.

Another option for the third stage, while continuing with the PHWR and FBR programs, is the subcritical Accelerator-Driven Systems (ADS) (see below).

Estimated World thorium resources
(RAR + IR to USD 80/kg Th)
Country tonnes % of world
Australia 425,000 18
USA 400,000 16
Turkey 344,000 13
India 319,000 12
Brazil 302,000 12
Venezuela 300,000 12
Norway 132,000 5
Egypt 100,000 4
Russia 75,000 3
Greenland 54,000 2
Canada 44,000 2
South Africa 18,000 1
Other countries 95,000 1
World total 2,573,000

Source: OECD/NEA Uranium 2007: Resources, Production and Demand (Red Book) 2008

:victory::chilli::yahoo::flame:
 
.
In 2007, trade between the two countries was at $2,647 million. What are the latest figures?

Any plans of handing over Dhruv's (ordered by Turkey) to the Turkish PM?

GB
 
.
In 2007, trade between the two countries was at $2,647 million. What are the latest figures?

Any plans of handing over Dhruv's (ordered by Turkey) to the Turkish PM?

GB


India is natural partner for Turkey, ambassador says


India an attractive market for Turkish construction companies

The trade volume between Turkey and India has doubled in the past three years, increasing to $3 billion.

“It is below the potential, but there are signs of it picking up again. Mutual investments are going on,” Jassal said.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan set a target of $6 billion in mutual trade when he visited India along with 200 businessmen in 2008. Because of the global downturn, however, Turkey’s foreign trade decreased in general.

Indian investments in Turkey have exceeded $1.2 billion and include packaging material, passenger buses and participation in big projects such as construction of the Sabiha Gökçen Airport in Istanbul.

Turkish construction companies have already entered the Indian market while Çelebi, an airport ground handling company, manages all airport operations in Mumbai and cargo operations in New Delhi, Jassal said.

With growth of 7.5 percent even during the crisis, India continues to present an attractive market for Turkish construction companies. “After the crisis, we will go back to over 9 percent. We are going to invest $500 billion in infrastructure in the next few years. This is a huge opportunity. Turkey has a good reputation in construction,” he said.

India seeking free trade with European market

India is looking for a free trade agreement with the European Union. “We are [also] in the process of starting the process for a free trade agreement between India and Turkey. You have a customs union with the EU. We are negotiating a free trade agreement with the EU, too,” he said.
 
.
Turkey joins India in battling terror, backs global convention

New Delhi, Feb 9 (IANS) Putting the 'misunderstanding' over a recent conclave on Afghanistan behind, Turkey Tuesday turned a new chapter in its ties with India by agreeing to jointly combat terror and backed the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism.

Turkey, a flag-bearer of the 57-nation Organisation of the Islamic Conference, is the first country in the group that has agreed to work with India in pushing the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT) that has been embroiled in differences over competing definitions of terrorism.

The two sides decided to firm up an action plan with timelines and specific measures to jointly combat terrorism after wide-ranging talks between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and visiting Turkish President Abdullah Gul.

The two sides also agreed to intensify scientific and technological cooperation and gave an impetus to trade and investment between the two growing economies.

They also agreed to take forward their talks on a free trade area that has the potential to multiply their current $3 billion trade manifold.

Manmohan Singh set the tone for improving relations, which had remained distant in the past due to Turkey's perceived closeness to Pakistan on the one hand and the Western alliance on the other.

Gul's visit is 'an important milestone to review the state of our bilateral relations and to chart a forward-looking agenda for advancing our multi-faceted cooperation,' the prime minister said.

Keen to assuage India after excluding it from a conclave on Afghanistan in Ankara last month, allegedly at the behest of Islamabad, Turkey went on a damage control exercise and lauded India's contribution to Afghanistan.

Stressing that the special relationship between Turkey and Pakistan 'did not in any way create obstructions for Turkey-India relations', Gul expressed the desire to work together with India in bringing stability to Afghanistan.

The Turkish president sought to allay India's concerns, saying Turkey would 'have liked India to be there and hoped that India would be able to participate in yet another meeting relating to developments in Afghanistan that would be hosted in Turkey later this year'.

'He wished to avoid any misunderstanding relating to a recent meeting in Istanbul on Afghanistan, which emerged from a trilateral format involving Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkey,' the external affairs ministry said.

The joint declaration on terrorism came as a shot in the arm for New Delhi as India has been pushing for the finalisation of the CCIT since 1996. The two sides agreed to work together and with other like-minded States for the finalisation of the CCIT at the earliest, said the joint declaration on terrorism.

The convention has been embroiled in differences over the definitions of terrorism with the OIC countries opposing a bid to bring armed forces of states within its purview.

The declaration recognises that 'terrorism poses a great threat to global peace and stability, denounces those who sponsor, abet and instigate terrorism and provide them safe heavens, decides to enhance cooperation in this field by developing an action plan with timelines and specific measures'.

Indo Asian News Service

Turkey joins India in battling terror, backs global convention - Yahoo! India News
 
.
Turkey promises to work with India for a stable Afghanistan - dnaindia.com

New Delhi: Turkish president Abdullah Gul, currently on a four-day visit to the country, was given a warm welcome in the capital even though Ankara had snubbed India last month by leaving it out of a regional conference on Afghanistan held in Istanbul

“India protested, Ankara apologised, and we’ve moved on,’’ a senior official confirmed. The matter was settled before Gul landed in India on Sunday. The Turkish president’s major meetings with government leaders took place on Tuesday.

During delegation-level talksbetween prime minister Manmohan Singh and president Gul, Afghanistan came up for discussion. “Gul said India’s contribution to Afghanistan is very important and expressed the desire to work with India in bringing stability in that country,” a statement by the external affairs ministry said.

Turkey has invited India to be part of the next regional conference on Afghanistan. Ankara’s decision to exclude India from the regional meet was at Pakistan’s insistence. Overlooking this, New Delhi and Ankara issued a joint declaration on terrorism in which both agreed to work towards finalising the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism, which India had proposed at the UN in 1996.
 
.
And there is a parallel thread goin on India vs Turkey .. lolzz

I am not sure what anti India-Turkey friendship trolls will say ..

Looking forward to this visit ..

Turkish girls are so pretty <3 :D :D
 
.
And there is a parallel thread goin on India vs Turkey .. lolzz

I am not sure what anti India-Turkey friendship trolls will say ..

Looking forward to this visit ..

Turkish girls are so pretty <3 :D :D

We need alliance with turkey for various reasons and don't forget turkish girls :smitten:
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom