Truth Behind Sinking Of INS Khukri -1971

[DESERT FIGHTER]

It reality because its a Pakistani report ? Statements like this show the intention of the author

It's reality because the author was part of PNS Hangor crew..
And what is wrong with that statement? And the "intentions" of an awarded war hero ? To hurt your fragile little feelings/ego?



Unlike idiots who are blaming USA for sinkin their ship... And other face saving,propoganda conspiracy theory.

 

[gslv mk3]

It's reality because the author was a crew member of PNS Hangor

That might also be enough to fit my theory too.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

That might also be enough to fit my theory too.

Your theory sucks ***... A lame attempt at saving face ... Another shitty theory tht Khurki was sunk by an American sub after 4 decades ... Without a single ffn proof or clue abt it.

And a troll who knows more abt the khurkis sinking than Hangor crew officer who was involved in that operation and later retired as a vice admiral.


Meanwhile what should be investigated is Ghazi that by neutral account sank during an accident laying mines .. As according to the egyptian cadet etc present at the indian port n eye witness ... And your very own gen Jacob .. Not to forget the "lost" records of indian navy on ghazi ... To prove otherwise ...


Also Hangor had left Karachi before the war had started n was a top notch sub commissioned in 1970... Lots of inaccuracies from the survivor of Hangor who "thinks" he has a reason to believe tht an American sub was involved without even knowin the basic facts ab the subs operations and capabilities ..

 

[gslv mk3]

Your theory sucks ***... A lame attempt at saving face

My theory is the one given in post #15.

 

[kurup]

He was lucky ... A survivor of ins Khurki is accusing the captain of Kirpan for displaying cowardice abandoning the survivors of ins Khurki..

All these are news reports ..... None of these claims can be verified unless Navy releases the details .

Lets say the survivor was right .

Even in that case the captain took the right decision keeping in mind the scenario at that time .

He could try to save the survivors pushing into risk his own ship and it's crew or he could come back and save the survivors when the threat is gone .

 

[Echo_419]

US is every where- over the ocean under the ocean- thats besides the point-
Question is Why US sank INS Kurki-

Becuz they were on your side then

 

[Areesh]

Let them drag it to the surface ...they will then claim it upon aliens ....or may be on ice berg

It can be martians. Anyone except Pakistanis. The ghairat of baighairat Modi fans can't accept that it was Pakistan who sank the ship.

So it is US. Definitely not Pakistan.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

All these are news reports ..... None of these claims can be verified unless Navy releases the details .

Lets say the survivor was right .

Even in that case the captain took the right decision keeping in mind the scenario at that time .

He could try to save the survivors pushing into risk his own ship and it's crew or he could come back and save the survivors when the threat is gone .

Apart frm the he alleges tht Kirpan comd was so scared tht he didn't return .. N more survivors could have been saved .. Tht was just 1 sub against almost 3 ships (kothar?) didn't didn't even come close when Hangor engaged it ..

 

[kurup]

It's reality because the author was part of PNS Hangor crew..
And what is wrong with that statement? And the "intentions" of an awarded war hero ? To hurt your fragile little feelings/ego?

The same can be said about Pakistanis also .

Any reports from Indian media or Indians are discarded by Pakistanis simply because they are Indian .

So why expecting us to believe your stories

Unlike idiots who are blaming USA for sinkin their ship... And other face saving,propoganda conspiracy theory.

There are some other idiots who think that Russians were the one who sank their ship and not Indians .

Do you think the same about them too ....... And other face saving,propoganda conspiracy theory.

Apart frm the he alleges tht Kirpan comd was so scared tht he didn't return .. N more survivors could have been saved .. Tht was just 1 sub against almost 3 ships (kothar?) didn't didn't even come close when Hangor engaged it ..

As I said unproven stories .

 

[Sage]

All these are news reports ..... None of these claims can be verified unless Navy releases the details .

Lets say the survivor was right .

Even in that case the captain took the right decision keeping in mind the scenario at that time .

He could try to save the survivors pushing into risk his own ship and it's crew or he could come back and save the survivors when the threat is gone .

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

The same can be said about Pakistanis also .

Any reports from Indian media or Indians are discarded by Pakistanis simply because they are Indian .

So why expecting us to believe your stories

You should ask your dad.. If he believes tht or not .. .. Nor do we lie about fake battles.

There are some other idiots who think that Russians were the one who sank their ship and not Indians .

Do you think the same about them too ....... And other face saving,propoganda conspiracy theory.

Nah .. Only idiots believe tht the whole world is like them/you...

 

[kurup]

Ya ..... what's so surprising .

You should should your dad.. If he believes tht or not .. .. Nor do we lie about fake battles.

I will ask my Dad and will reply about it later .

Nah .. Only idiots believe tht the whole world is like them/you...

Many Pakistani members believes so like windy who posted something related to it the other day .

 

[Windjammer]

Meanwhile another survivor from INS Kukri has another story to blow the lid.

Correct Naval history, says INS Khukri survivor - The Times of India

CHANDIGARH: Did the crew of INS Kirpan, the Indian Navy frigate which was honoured with gallantry award for its role in 1971 Indo-Pak war play an ignominious role by deserting sailors who were drowning in INS Khukri?

Nearly 40 years after the sinking of INS Khukri, this is the question being raised by one of the survivors of the ill-fated frigate of Indian Navy.

A retired sailor, Chanchal Singh Gill, who served in the Indian Navy for 14 years, has moved the Chandigarh bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) seeking correction of Naval history related to the INS Khukri.

A comprehensive time bound inquiry by a commission, withdrawal of gallantry awards from those who allegedly showed cowardice, including officers and Commanding Officer of INS Kirpan, and fixing responsibility for the Indian Navy's ''greatest cover up after the greatest tragedy'', besides their court martial, has also been sought.

The main allegations of 58-year old Gill — who was on duty as artificer apprentice on the fateful night of December 9, 1971 when the Pakistani submarine PNS Hangor hit the INS Khukri — is that the record prepared by the Historical Cell of Directorate of Naval Operations, at Naval Headquarters, New Delhi, pertaining to INS Khukri is ''far away from the truth''.

While pointing out ''glaring errors'' in the records, which came to his notice in February 2004, that 'Khukri sank just by one torpedo hit whereas INS Kirpan manoeuvered to deflect torpedo attacks', Gill claims that actually three torpedoes had hit Khukri and instead of joining action to counter the attack, INS Kirpan ''fled away''. After reading the official account, Gill immediately sent letters to parliamentary standing committee on defence seeking correction of the records but has not heard from them till now.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Meanwhile another survivor from INS Kukri has another story to blow the lid.

Correct Naval history, says INS Khukri survivor - The Times of India

CHANDIGARH: Did the crew of INS Kirpan, the Indian Navy frigate which was honoured with gallantry award for its role in 1971 Indo-Pak war play an ignominious role by deserting sailors who were drowning in INS Khukri?

Nearly 40 years after the sinking of INS Khukri, this is the question being raised by one of the survivors of the ill-fated frigate of Indian Navy.

A retired sailor, Chanchal Singh Gill, who served in the Indian Navy for 14 years, has moved the Chandigarh bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) seeking correction of Naval history related to the INS Khukri.

A comprehensive time bound inquiry by a commission, withdrawal of gallantry awards from those who allegedly showed cowardice, including officers and Commanding Officer of INS Kirpan, and fixing responsibility for the Indian Navy's ''greatest cover up after the greatest tragedy'', besides their court martial, has also been sought.

The main allegations of 58-year old Gill — who was on duty as artificer apprentice on the fateful night of December 9, 1971 when the Pakistani submarine PNS Hangor hit the INS Khukri — is that the record prepared by the Historical Cell of Directorate of Naval Operations, at Naval Headquarters, New Delhi, pertaining to INS Khukri is ''far away from the truth''.

While pointing out ''glaring errors'' in the records, which came to his notice in February 2004, that 'Khukri sank just by one torpedo hit whereas INS Kirpan manoeuvered to deflect torpedo attacks', Gill claims that actually three torpedoes had hit Khukri and instead of joining action to counter the attack, INS Kirpan ''fled away''. After reading the official account, Gill immediately sent letters to parliamentary standing committee on defence seeking correction of the records but has not heard from them till now.

 

[Chak Bamu]

That might also be enough to fit my theory too.

I am not aware that torpedoes fly flags. Or that attacking subs inform victim vessel officers of their intentions and origins. How would the victims know the 'nationality' of the torpedo that hit them?

Desperate rubbish.