What's new

Trump to approve bill to declare Pakistan a terror state: Shalabh

Dawood Ibrahim

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 25, 2016
Messages
3,475
Reaction score
3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
US President-elect Donald Trump will approve a Congress bill to declare Pakistan a terror state when the legislation reaches him, said Shalabh Kumar, a key Indian-origin member of Donald Trump’s advisory council and prominent businessman.

A key step that the new president is expected to take is to give assent to the US Congress bill that has been introduced in the house to declare Pakistan a terror state when the legislation reaches him,” Kumar said in an interview.

Two US Congressmen, for the first time ever, introduced a legislation to designate Pakistan as a terror state by the administration in Washington last September. House Subcommittee on Terrorism chairman Congressman Ted Poe along with Congressman Dana Rohrabacher introduced the ‘Pakistan State Sponsor of Terrorism Designation Act’ in the House.

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/201...l-to-declare-pakistan-a-terror-state-shalabh/


@GreenFalcon @war&peace @Morse_Code @Major d1 @Indus Falcon @Khafee @El_Swordsmen @Farah Sohail @PaklovesTurkiye
 
.
We already have a thread running about this.
 
.
US President-elect Donald Trump will approve a Congress bill to declare Pakistan a terror state when the legislation reaches him, said Shalabh Kumar, a key Indian-origin member of Donald Trump’s advisory council and prominent businessman.

A key step that the new president is expected to take is to give assent to the US Congress bill that has been introduced in the house to declare Pakistan a terror state when the legislation reaches him,” Kumar said in an interview.

Two US Congressmen, for the first time ever, introduced a legislation to designate Pakistan as a terror state by the administration in Washington last September. House Subcommittee on Terrorism chairman Congressman Ted Poe along with Congressman Dana Rohrabacher introduced the ‘Pakistan State Sponsor of Terrorism Designation Act’ in the House.

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/201...l-to-declare-pakistan-a-terror-state-shalabh/


@GreenFalcon @war&peace @Morse_Code @Major d1 @Indus Falcon @Khafee @El_Swordsmen @Farah Sohail @PaklovesTurkiye

Says who???
An Indian!
Whose sole pride is Sir jee Kal Strike
1f642.png
:)

Kumar , What an imagination Bro!
 
Last edited:
.
US President-elect Donald Trump will approve a Congress bill to declare Pakistan a terror state when the legislation reaches him, said Shalabh Kumar, a key Indian-origin member of Donald Trump’s advisory council and prominent businessman.

A key step that the new president is expected to take is to give assent to the US Congress bill that has been introduced in the house to declare Pakistan a terror state when the legislation reaches him,” Kumar said in an interview.

Two US Congressmen, for the first time ever, introduced a legislation to designate Pakistan as a terror state by the administration in Washington last September. House Subcommittee on Terrorism chairman Congressman Ted Poe along with Congressman Dana Rohrabacher introduced the ‘Pakistan State Sponsor of Terrorism Designation Act’ in the House.

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/201...l-to-declare-pakistan-a-terror-state-shalabh/


@GreenFalcon @war&peace @Morse_Code @Major d1 @Indus Falcon @Khafee @El_Swordsmen @Farah Sohail @PaklovesTurkiye

I do not know if this is true, as a state, Pakistan is far better than many other countries where US has relation with. It is complely incorrect to say a nation as a Terrorist state. Rather US Gov should try to specifically target the groups withing Pakistan which is trying side with terrorist or its thoughts...But again, US has made its hand very dirty...whoever is trorist for US now, 30 years back, they are their allies. So i doubt US will be in a situation to do that in a legal way...
 
. . .
Shalabh “Shalli” Kumar is an Indian American industrialist and a philanthropist based out of Chicago. He is also a conservative commentator, community activist and a political donor.
 
.
Pressler all over again? Hope not.



114th CONGRESS
2d Session


H. R. 6069

To require a report on the designation of Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 20, 2016
Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself and Mr. Rohrabacher) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL
To require a report on the designation of Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “Pakistan State Sponsor of Terrorism Designation Act”.

SEC. 2. Report on designation of Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism.

(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:

(1) Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, al-Qaeda leaders and the Afghan Taliban fled Afghanistan to Pakistan and settled in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). Joint Task Force Guantanamo threat assessments subsequently revealed that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) facilitated al-Qaeda’s movement of fighters to and from Afghanistan as well as the terrorist organization’s purchase of weapons.

(2) The Government of Pakistan, and the ISI in particular, provide support and a safe haven to groups designated as foreign terrorist organizations pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189) by the United States Government. Then Chairman of the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen testified in 2011 that “the Haqqani Network … acts as a veritable arm of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency. With ISI support, Haqqani operatives planned and conducted” various attacks against United States personnel and interests in Afghanistan, including a 2011 attack on the United States Embassy in Kabul.

(3) The founder and leader of al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, was found and killed in the Pakistani military town of Abbottabad in 2011. The Government of Pakistan subsequently condemned the raid that killed the terrorist leader and continues to imprison Dr. Shakil Afridi, the Pakistani doctor who played an instrumental role in identifying Osama bin Laden’s hiding place.

(4) A 2012 NATO report indicated that the Afghan Taliban is directly assisted by the Pakistani security services and noted that “Pakistan’s manipulation of the Taliban senior leadership continues [unabated]”. The report also suggested that Pakistan is aware of the locations of senior Taliban leaders, including one who maintained a residence in the immediate vicinity of the ISI headquarters in Islamabad.

(5) The leader of the Afghan Taliban, Mullah Akhtar Mansour, was located in southwestern Pakistan at the time of his death by a United States drone strike on May 21, 2016. Pakistan’s Baluchistan Province has long been a haven for the Afghan Taliban, and the group’s top leadership is headquartered in the city of Quetta in Baluchistan Province.

(6) The Department of State’s 2016 Country Reports on Terrorism noted that Pakistan “did not take substantial action against the Afghan Taliban or HQN (the Haqqani Network), or substantially limit their ability to threaten United States interests in Afghanistan”. The report also stated that “Pakistan has not taken sufficient action against other externally-focused groups such as Laskar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), which continued to cooperate, train, organize, and fundraise in Pakistan”. Moreover, since passage of Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), the Secretary of Defense has been unable to certify that Pakistan has taken adequate action against the Haqqani Network in accordance with section 1222(f) of such Act.

(7) Pakistan has not taken steps to demonstrate its commitment to prevent the Haqqani Network from using North Waziristan as a safe haven, nor has it shown progress in arresting and prosecuting Haqqani Network senior leaders and mid-level operatives.

(b) Reports.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the Secretary of State and in consultation with the heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that determines whether—

(A) (i) with respect to each of the acts described in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a), the Government of Pakistan, including any agents or instrumentalities of such Government, directly or indirectly, committed, conspired to commit, attempted, aided, or abetted any such act; or

(ii) the Government of Pakistan, including any agents or instrumentalities of such Government, directly or indirectly, committed, conspired to commit, attempted, aided, or abetted any act not referred to in clause (i) that constitutes an act of international terrorism; and

(B) any such act referred to in subparagraph (A)(i) constitutes an act of or support for international terrorism.

(2) FOLLOW-UP.—Not later than 30 days after the submission of the report required under paragraph (1), the Secretary of State shall determine if any act referred to in such paragraph constitutes support for international terrorism and shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains—

(A) a determination that the Government of Pakistan is a state sponsor of terrorism; or

(B) a detailed justification as to why the conduct described in the report required under such paragraph does not meet the legal criteria for such a determination.

(c) Form.—The reports required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex, if appropriate.

SEC. 3. Definitions.

In this Act:

(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—

(A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and

(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

(2) STATE SPONSOR OF TERRORISM.—The term “state sponsor of terrorism” means a country the government of which the Secretary of State has determined, for purposes of section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 4605(j)) (as continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)), section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371), section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780), or any other provision of law, is a government that has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/6069/text
 
. .
US President-elect Donald Trump will approve a Congress bill to declare Pakistan a terror state when the legislation reaches him, said Shalabh Kumar, a key Indian-origin member of Donald Trump’s advisory council and prominent businessman.

Whose interests is Shalabh Kumar is pursuing? It cannot be America's because declaring Pakistan a terrorist state would be detrimental to US influence in the region. I swear sometimes these Indian-American are more Indians than Americans.
 
. .
I would not ridicule this outrangeous thread.

TRUMP is capable of doing some strange things
 
.
And what will happen to money US owe to Pakistan for their loyal service all these years.. They can settle their dues with Haqqanis and others without any prob but US due will be a great loss
 
.
It is constantly Ted Poe and Dana Rohrabacher that bring up anti Pakistan stuff in Congress. Sell outs of such a shameless scale they don't even try to act "neutral" while still secretly pushing their agenda. My guess is they r on Indian Lobby's payroll.

As for the bill if it passes it'll only push Pakistan in China's camp sooner than later. It would be a bad move in this international chess game. Unlike the previous sanctions it would achieve very little. Since for economic and military needs Pakistan can now rely on China more than ever. While US would only lose an ally and any remaining leverage.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom