Psychic
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2015
- Messages
- 3,164
- Reaction score
- 29
- Country
- Location
But Pakistan was isolated.When was the last time US solved a problem anywhere in the world ? No one has experienced this first hand better ( actually worse) than your nation.
Next, you guys are relatively new to the machinations of Politicians & their spoken word. Since 1947 till now we have seen 13 US Presidents each ( may) have suggested something or the other . Indian policy has remained steadfast- 'No thank you'
As regards trolling , India does not get trolled so fast. The Seventh Fleet , sanctions etc did not deter us from what we felt was right for our national interests , why should things change now ?
Sit back & enjoy the ride
A terrorist pariah state.
Nobody gives any importance to Pakistan but India which is a superpower with flag on moon.
Moe D said he has isolated Pakistan.
Is that's how isolation is supposed to look like?
You utterly failed to get the point @The Eagle was trying to make. He clearly mentioned that Trump's statement won't change anything on ground. What this whole episode shows is that fact that Pakistan's image has improved tremendously despite facing rabid propaganda. Relationships with GCC, China, Russia and now USA have improved causing stomach ache to a billion people. And don't forget the main agenda for the talks i.e Afghanistan which will have zero Indian role in it despite a multi-billion dollar Bharti investment destined to go down the drain.
So Pakistan staying neutral after 9/11 was a possibility? The exodus of AQ from Afghanistan to Pakistan post-invasion would have drawn us in regardless of our neutrality.And that is fine, but if a moderator is baiting straw incidence to generalize a nationality, I am going to point it out. As far as foreign policy, Pakistan threw its a door open to US to it's own detriment across the cold war + 15 years, now it's doing the same vis-a-vis china.
Stoping AQ or it's US pursuers from crossing over would've ended our neutrality right there and then. Add to that 196 countries siding with the US at UN.
Then the same bunch accuses us of playing double games and harboring Haqqanis and whatnot. Can you make up your mind first about us acting as slaves or pursuing our interests of harboring enemies of a super power and succeeding at that?
Had we been slaves for couple of jets, there would've been no nuclear program and no JF17 for starters.