Cell_DbZ
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2017
- Messages
- 487
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
A 'bodycount' is a bad way to compare, this way, the Chinese could justify killing 9 million Japanese, because in wwII Japan killed 10 million Chinese.So, could you able to count those hundreds and thousands killed by Allies in Heroshima and Nagasaki - none of them were innocents?
Hundreds and thousands killed in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Palestine - none of them was innocent.
Please compare the facts.
You count how many innocents killed in both scenarios and then decide yourself who deserves to be the terrorists and who does not deserve a grain? a dust particle of sympathy.
My friend, word 'innocent' does not only belongs to your part of the world, it is to be used for whole world or humanity.
Never defended Usa/NATO killings accross the globe. I really feel for the people in the middle East, they suffered, but as soon you're going to kill innocent people around the world, you indeed deserve not even an atom of respect. Let's not forget that the main victim of terror are muslim people too.
You seem to be defending ISIS in their murderous Jihad, many people in the Usa seemed to advicate agains the war in Iraq as soon as it was clear there were no WMD's. Innocent people cannot be the victim for what their rotten governement did and that goes against everyone.