What's new

Trump drops US commitment to 'two-state' solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
US President Donald Trump halted Washington's quest for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict Wednesday, saying he would back a single state if it led to peace.

The new president warmly welcomed Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House and hailed the “unbreakable” bond between their countries.

And — while he urged Netanyahu to “hold back” from building Jewish settlements for a “little bit” — Trump broke with the international consensus insisting on two states.

“So I'm looking at two state and one state, and I like the one that both parties like. I'm very happy with the one that both parties like. I can live with either one,” he said.

“I thought for a while the two-state looked like it may be the easier of the two but, honestly, if Israel and the Palestinians are happy, I am happy with the one they like the best.”

If this change in the US stance was calculated to please Netanyahu and his right-wing coalition, Trump's views on the shortcomings of the Palestinian position will delight them.

“I think the Palestinians have to get rid of some of that hate that they're taught from a very young age,” he said, echoing Netanyahu's argument that Palestinians are not ready for peace.

“They're taught tremendous hate. I have seen what they're taught... it starts in the school room, and they have to acknowledge Israel.”

Netanyahu had warm words for the US alliance, and hammered home his own prerequisites for peace.

“First, the Palestinians must recognise the Jewish state. They have to stop calling for Israel's destruction,” he said.

“Second, in any peace agreement, Israel must retain the overriding security control over the entire area west of the Jordan River,” he added.

This area contains the entire West Bank area that would represent the heart of any Palestinian state as conceived in all previous international agreements.

The change in the US stance, which was trailed overnight by a US official, triggered Palestinian despair and consternation in international capitals.

The second ranking official in the Palestine Liberation Organisation, Saeb Erekat, denounced it as an attempt to “bury the two state solution and eliminate the state of Palestine.” And he warned that any single state that emerged would lose Israel's Jewish character.

“There's only one alternative,” he told a news conference. “A single democratic state that guarantees the rights of all: Jews, Muslims and Christians.”

Victory cry
The new US message deliberately echoed the long-standing Israeli position: No peace deal can be imposed from outside and the agenda for talks must reflect the reality on the ground.

Naftali Bennett, the right-wing leader of the hardliner Jewish Home party and an opponent of any Palestinian state cried victory.

“A new era. New ideas. No need for third Palestinian state beyond Jordan and Gaza. Big day for Israelis and reasonable Arabs. Congrats,” he tweeted.

But Trump's decision flew in the face of an international consensus that any final status agreement must be based on a return to Israel's 1967 border — albeit with land swaps.

Just five days before Trump's January 20 inauguration, Barack Obama's outgoing US administration was among 70 countries to endorse this vision at a peace conference in Paris.

And just a month before that, Obama's ambassador to the United Nations broke with longstanding US policy to allow a UN motion that criticised Israeli settlement building.

Addressing a US-Israeli conference in December, the then secretary of state John Kerry called settlements a “barrier” to progress.

Under Trump, that vision appears dead, and Washington has aligned itself with Netanyahu's government and its supporters in the right-wing settler movement.

Speaking in Cairo after talks with Egypt's President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, UN chief Antonio Guterres warned that “everything must be done” to preserve the two-state solution.

France, which organised the January peace conference, was also unimpressed. Its ambassador to the UN, Francois Delattre told reporters “our commitment to the two-state solution is stronger than ever.”

Trump has tapped son-in-law Jared Kushner and lawyer Jason Greenblatt to lead peace efforts. Kushner had dinner with Netanyahu — a long time family friend — and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on Tuesday night.
 
.
Trump drops US commitment to 'two-state' solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
AFP — UPDATED 42 minutes ago
WHATSAPP
0 COMMENTS
PRINT
58a4b012d7683.jpg

US President Donald Trump\ and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hold a joint press conference. -AFP
US President Donald Trump halted Washington's quest for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict Wednesday, saying he would back a single state if it led to peace.

The new president warmly welcomed Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House and hailed the “unbreakable” bond between their countries.

And — while he urged Netanyahu to “hold back” from building Jewish settlements for a “little bit” — Trump broke with the international consensus insisting on two states.

“So I'm looking at two state and one state, and I like the one that both parties like. I'm very happy with the one that both parties like. I can live with either one,” he said.

“I thought for a while the two-state looked like it may be the easier of the two but, honestly, if Israel and the Palestinians are happy, I am happy with the one they like the best.”

If this change in the US stance was calculated to please Netanyahu and his right-wing coalition, Trump's views on the shortcomings of the Palestinian position will delight them.

“I think the Palestinians have to get rid of some of that hate that they're taught from a very young age,” he said, echoing Netanyahu's argument that Palestinians are not ready for peace.

“They're taught tremendous hate. I have seen what they're taught... it starts in the school room, and they have to acknowledge Israel.”

Netanyahu had warm words for the US alliance, and hammered home his own prerequisites for peace.

“First, the Palestinians must recognise the Jewish state. They have to stop calling for Israel's destruction,” he said.

“Second, in any peace agreement, Israel must retain the overriding security control over the entire area west of the Jordan River,” he added.

This area contains the entire West Bank area that would represent the heart of any Palestinian state as conceived in all previous international agreements.

The change in the US stance, which was trailed overnight by a US official, triggered Palestinian despair and consternation in international capitals.

The second ranking official in the Palestine Liberation Organisation, Saeb Erekat, denounced it as an attempt to “bury the two state solution and eliminate the state of Palestine.” And he warned that any single state that emerged would lose Israel's Jewish character.

“There's only one alternative,” he told a news conference. “A single democratic state that guarantees the rights of all: Jews, Muslims and Christians.”

Victory cry
The new US message deliberately echoed the long-standing Israeli position: No peace deal can be imposed from outside and the agenda for talks must reflect the reality on the ground.

Naftali Bennett, the right-wing leader of the hardliner Jewish Home party and an opponent of any Palestinian state cried victory.

“A new era. New ideas. No need for third Palestinian state beyond Jordan and Gaza. Big day for Israelis and reasonable Arabs. Congrats,” he tweeted.

But Trump's decision flew in the face of an international consensus that any final status agreement must be based on a return to Israel's 1967 border — albeit with land swaps.

Just five days before Trump's January 20 inauguration, Barack Obama's outgoing US administration was among 70 countries to endorse this vision at a peace conference in Paris.

And just a month before that, Obama's ambassador to the United Nations broke with longstanding US policy to allow a UN motion that criticised Israeli settlement building.

Addressing a US-Israeli conference in December, the then secretary of state John Kerry called settlements a “barrier” to progress.

Under Trump, that vision appears dead, and Washington has aligned itself with Netanyahu's government and its supporters in the right-wing settler movement.

Speaking in Cairo after talks with Egypt's President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, UN chief Antonio Guterres warned that “everything must be done” to preserve the two-state solution.

France, which organised the January peace conference, was also unimpressed. Its ambassador to the UN, Francois Delattre told reporters “our commitment to the two-state solution is stronger than ever.”

Trump has tapped son-in-law Jared Kushner and lawyer Jason Greenblatt to lead peace efforts. Kushner had dinner with Netanyahu — a long time family friend — and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on Tuesday night.
 
.
A single state solution - in the current environment will lead to an apartheid state which is already what it is and that isn't a solution to the problem a two state solution is the only solution to the situation the Americans and the Israelis have never been serious to commit to it and implement it
 
Last edited:
.
A single state solution would create a civil war like in Syria.
 
.
even when the 'commitment' was there for decades the Palestinian state was no where close to becoming a reality and was blocked every step of the way so what does this change really ? what was the use of that useless 'commitment'
 
. .
A one state solution would mean citizenship and equal voting rights for Palestinians. Let's see how Israelis feel about that...
 
.
yeah saw some arab media journalist spreading fake news about this issue.trump is into something else,he just nailed the last coffin on this issue.
 
.
This is serious trouble. One state solution means a free pass for Israel. It is not very difficult to predict that the conflict between Israel and Palestine is about to enter a whole new phase.

Let's see if the Arabs welcome this news just like they welcomed the ban.
 
.
This is serious trouble. One state solution means a free pass for Israel. It is not very difficult to predict that the conflict between Israel and Palestine is about to enter a whole new phase.

Let's see if the Arabs welcome this news just like they welcomed the ban.

The Gulf countries are the most spineless backstabbing cowards I have ever seen. See how they rejoiced when Trump banned their Arab brothers and extended a ban themselves. They are more concerned about cornering Iran than giving a Sh!t about the Palestinians.

And you are right, this is likely going to cause an outburst of violence unlike before if PLO completely withdraws from negotiations, not that there much left now with this statement of Trumps.
 
.
Not surprising. I have been saying this will happen for some time.

The Palestinians are cooked. No one cares anymore evidently.

What a shame for the Muslim world.
 
.
he just said he is happy with one option which israelis and pallys are happy with.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom