Sineva
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 24, 2018
- Messages
- 4,657
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Your moniker is well chosen I see...Reagen actually did apologise (while not using the word apologise) on the incident in two separate letter, one open, one private to the Iranian counter part.
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/doc...-the-united-states-navy-over-the-persian-gulf (The open letter/statement)
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-07-06-mn-5341-story.html (Mentioned he send a private letter and think he apologised enough for the incident)
While nobody knows what the private notes said, it is probably a diplomatic letter as take responsibility for the action. The open letter though, was the standard "Regret loss of life" letter, which could mean something or mean nothing.
And finally, in term of civil law, US paid the compensation is in itself an admission of guilt. If you are not a guilty part, you will not pay the compensation.
As for defending itself, no country would directly take "Hey, what we did was wrong" approach, of almost all of the accidental shoot down incident. Nobody would ever admit they should not have done so, but will say things like "regret", "unfortunate" and sometime even without warrant an response.
In 1954 PLA fighters shot down a Cathay Pacific DC-4, in it's "Apology" it mentioned only "accidental and unfortunate incident", the pilot were promoted, mostly because of the limited air war that follow the rescue operation.
In 1955, Bulgaria fighters shot down an Israeli flight El Al 402, the Bulguria blame El Al 402 for intruding its airspace (Which was disputed) but in its "Apology" the Bulgarian claim their fighter pilot made a hasty decision. The pilots were considered jail term and demotion, none were made.
In 1978, Soviet Union fighters shot down Korean Flight 902 intruding into SU airspace due to navigation error. 10 of the passenger and crew was killed. SU did not issue an apology to the incident, rather, they send KAL a $100,000 bill for the fighter interception and shipping of the remain of KAL flight and body back to Korea.
In 1980, an Italian Itavia Flight 870 DC-9 was shot down, presumably by French via missile (At least this is what Italy court rules, the missile part, not the French part), no apology was record from anyone, no blame as to recorded for anyone. Italy court order Italy Military to compensate partly to the incident in 2013 (Yes, 33 years later) and currently there are no responsibility being assign to this incident.
In 1983, the famous (or rather infamous) KAL 007 incident. SU did not offer an apology nor offer any compensation (It was compensated by US via a court case in the end), SU still maintain KAL007 is a Spy Plane (RC-135) and was right to shoot them down, and blame CIA for the incident, even tho fighter send to intercept clearly see it is an civilian airline.
The compensation was paid ex gratia ie the giver does not admit any liability or legal obligation
Still you do raise some very good points for which I thank you.I guess then that iran doesnt need to apologise or to accept responsibility or even offer compensation,in that case maybe we`ll even get to see the tor operators get some medals.....or bonuses,or both.....or not.
I do have to wonder tho,which newsweek cover will more accurately portray the media narrative on the flight 752 shoot down?