TPP failure would cost the US trade dominance

[cochine]

The point is, you will unlikely get the benefits of the TPP, other than being a cheap-labor paradise, if it ever be approved by the US power elite.

Don't cry when Trump got elected. LOL

we don't care what do you think and troll here.

 

[Bussard Ramjet]

U can be in self-denial political correct mode. Sorry, we won't. Dream your demographic dividend dream.

Study some demographic policy. Then you would know the technical definition of demographic dividend, and other associated terms. Right now, you are just throwing around terms like anything.

 

[AndrewJin]

Study some demographic policy. Then you would know the technical definition of demographic dividend, and other associated terms. Right now, you are just throwing around terms like anything.

Ok ok, you will have the best demographic dividend in 2050 like in americano, ok?

 

[Bussard Ramjet]

Ok ok, you will have the best demographic dividend in 2050 like in americano, ok?

That is what I said, you are misusing the term demographic dividend. It is a very specific term, and signifies something in the demographic evolution of countries.

 

[AndrewJin]

That is what I said, you are misusing the term demographic dividend. It is a very specific term, and signifies something in the demographic evolution of countries.

I agree you will have the demongraphic dividend in 2012, cheap flag makers will dominate.

 

[windywine]

For example, Fox is uber PRO-GOP, they will only support GOP whenever or whatever their decision. As they are controlled by the Party like you said, HOWEVER, you should also notice that there are 4 Major Media Outlet there are, Fox, CBS, NBC and ABC, with almost equal share of Audience and they all have different Political Different, they will basically attack each other political value, and hence out cannot get out of being complacent and incompetent, because there are ALWAYS another type of media who will go into deep length and doubt your political value, and whichever side you are (GOP or Democrats) there will always be at least half a country doubt what you do at any given time.

Again wrong. Whenever or whatever PRO-GOP medias attack Democratic or PRO-Demo medias attacks GOP doesn't touch the core value of the system. Capital owns those medias. The attacks among those medias shown to public are just part of game.

 

[jhungary]

Again wrong. Whenever or whatever PRO-GOP medias attack Democratic or PRO-Demo medias attacks GOP doesn't touch the core value of the system. Capital owns those medias. The attacks among those medias shown to public are just part of game.

This is not wrong, in fact, this is an opinion, you have your own opinion and I have mine, whether or not you think the media is holding close to the core political value is your own opinion, I cannot say yours wrong as much as you can say mine's wrong. You can believe in anything you want, again, this is your own opinion

You are wrong to say the medias are not independent. As Media ARE independent, the fact that we have more than one major media outlet ensure medias (as a whole) is independent from the current government.

The Chinese Media, on the other hand, is not independent.

 

[windywine]

This is US, not China.

Of course China medias are controlled by China government. However, the criticisms on China are from Western medias. Those criticisms, no matter right or wrong, true or fake, always directly are on the core value of China's system. And those voice are profound and dominant. On the other hand, the opposition voice on Western is too weak. That's the huge issue for Western society.

As Media ARE independent, the fact that we have more than one major media outlet ensure medias (as a whole) is independent from the current government.

No media are independent. Capital owns US medias and also the US politicians.

 

[jhungary]

Of course China medias are controlled by China government. However, the criticisms on China are from Western medias. Those criticisms, no matter right or wrong, true or fake, always directly are on the core value of China's system. And those voice are profound and dominant. On the other hand, the opposition voice on Western is too weak. That's the huge issue for Western society.


No media are independent. Capital owns US medias and also the US politicians.

Agin, you can have your own opinion

And no, I mean MEDIAS (as in all the medias in general) not a single medias. Medias are not dependent to Political System.

The media system in the US by design is so not to be controlled by the government, as you have 4 major Television outlet in the US, but only 2 party. The definition of media diversity itself means they are not depending on US Government.

 

[windywine]

And no, I mean MEDIAS (as in all the medias in general) not a single medias. Medias are not dependent to Political System

Wrong again. In US Capital owns medias and owns the politicians Therefore Medias and political system are not independent with each other.

Agin, you can have your own opinion

And no, I mean MEDIAS (as in all the medias in general) not a single medias. Medias are not dependent to Political System.

The media system in the US by design is so not to be controlled by the government, as you have 4 major Television outlet in the US, but only 2 party. The definition of media diversity itself means they are not depending on US Government.

The media system in the US is not controlled by us government, is controlled by capital.

 

[jhungary]

Wrong again. In US Capital owns medias and owns the politicians Therefore Medias and political system are not independent with each other.

Just because you keep saying it, it does not make it true.

The media system in the US is not controlled by anybody, the very fact that there are multiple major outlet itself make sure the media cannot be controlled by a single party.

When GOP is in the government, both CBS and NBC will go against it, and when Democrats in charge, Fox and ABC almost always attack the government, hence it is IMPOSSIBLE for any party to control the media as a whole.

The media system in the US is not controlled by us government, is controlled by capital.

What do you mean by capital? You mean capitalism or capital hill?

 

[windywine]

The media system in the US is not controlled by anybody, the very fact that there are multiple major outlet itself make sure the media cannot be controlled by a single party.

Medias in US are controlled by capital. Does that make it clear to you?

 

[jhungary]

Medias in US are controlled by capital. Does that make it clear to you?

no, again, what do you mean by "capital"?

 

[jhungary]

~_~ Who is GOD in US? Its money. Of course the term of capital I uses here is blongs to capitalism

You should have use Money.......instead of keep saying capital, capital here can mean capital hill, especially when you say US capital.

 

[windywine]

no, again, what do you mean by "capital"?

The term of capital I used here is related to capitalism

You should have use Money.......instead of keep saying capital, capital here can mean capital hill, especially when you say US capital.

Now you understand my point?