What's new

Top security official warns 'drums of war are beating' amid rising China tensions

Uncensored

BANNED
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Messages
182
Reaction score
-15
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
One of the Federal Government's top national security officials has warned the "drums of war" are beating amid rising tensions with China.

In an Anzac Day message to staff, Home Affairs Department Secretary Mike Pezzullo said Australia must work to reduce the risk of
war
"but not at the cost of our precious liberty".

"Today, as free nations again hear the beating drums and watch worryingly the militarisation of issues that we had, until recent years, thought unlikely to be catalysts for war, let us continue to search unceasingly for the chance for peace while bracing again, yet again, for the curse of war," Mr Pezzullo said.

1619474959764.png

A top Australian national security official has warned that the 'drums of war' are beating amid China's rise in the Asia Pacific. (AP)


Security expert John Blaxland told Today Mr Pezzullo's words were "chilling" but a realistic summary of the security threats faced by Australia.

"It is chilling but it is sobering ... Inside government bureaucracy we are seeing a reminder that the stakes are getting high," Professor Blaxland said.

Professor Blaxland, from the Australian National University (ANU), said Mr Pezzullo's speech was a wake-up call for the Federal Government and defence planners.

He said the Australian Defence Force needed more resources to respond to China's rise.

"We are way off any kind of ability to respond," he said this morning.

"We have a boutique defence force that, you know, in terms of just in land power terms alone, it is about one-and-a-half divisions. In the Second World War at its peak we had 14."

1619475023988.png

China's military build up in the South China Sea includes building artificial reefs that can be used as defence bases. (Getty images)


In contrast, China has launched a massive military expansion program along with increased cyber warfare capabilities.

"The number of ships that China has in the South China Sea is mind blowing and they are intimidating, Malaysia, the Philippines - anybody except probably Vietnam - are intimidated to do anything."

In his speech, Mr Pezzullo, warned that Australia must be prepared "to send off, yet again, our warriors to fight".

"Today, as free nations again hear the beating drums and watch worryingly the militarisation of issues that we had, until recent years, thought unlikely to be catalysts for war, let us continue to search unceasingly for the chance for peace while bracing again, yet again, for the curse of war," Mr Pezzullo said.

Home Affairs Minister Karen Andrews told Today the Australian government was "alert but not alarmed" about regional threats.

"I think the overarching message from government is that we need to be alert but not alarmed. That is going to be the consistent messaging from us," she said.

"We're obviously very conscious as a government of what is happening in the Pacific region, in particular, and we will always put Australians first, second and third."

But Labor frontbencher Bill Shorten told Today that top government officials such as Mr Pezzullo should avoid "inflammatory" language.

"I don't understand why they are using such inflammatory language.

"So by all means we need to stand up for our trade, stand up for rule rights, but language like 'drums of war', I think that is pretty hyper-excited language," Mr Shorten said.

1619475076920.png

Defence Minister Peter Dutton has warned China is militarising ports in the Asia Pacific region. (9News)


Earlier this week, Defence Minister Peter Dutton warned that China was militarising ports in the region.

"We need to recognise that our region is changing," Mr Dutton said on Sunday.

"China is militarising ports across our region. We need to deal with all of that, and that is exactly what we are now focused on."

The comments follow the contentious decision by Foreign Minister Marise Payne to scrap Victoria's controversial infrastructure agreement with Beijing linked to China's Belt and Road initiative.

 
.
Seems like someone has finally seen the reality on the ground and how things have changed and constantly changing
 
.
China is no match for Royal Navy

UK is sending its £3 billion carrier right to Chinas front door

its like me sending my Bugatti to my enemy front door and double dare him to touch it, and he doesnt

humiliation and loss of respect and credibility

make note, UK is sending its top assets into enemy territory, basically parking a carrier in someones back yard not even neutral territory, so you can image what would happen if UK and China met in open ocean in the Pacific

shows the guts and faith UK has in its naval assets, China on the other hand in 10 years of CV-16 being commissioned does not even have the confidence to send it outside South China Sea

and 15 years of Type 071 LPD and its never conducted a single over the horizon amphibious landing
 
.
Salaam

China is no match for Royal Navy

UK is sending its £3 billion carrier right to Chinas front door

its like me sending my Bugatti to my enemy front door and double dare him to touch it, and he doesnt

humiliation and loss of respect and credibility

make note, UK is sending its top assets into enemy territory, basically parking a carrier in someones back yard not even neutral territory, so you can image what would happen if UK and China met in open ocean in the Pacific

shows the guts and faith UK has in its naval assets, China on the other hand in 10 years of CV-16 being commissioned does not even have the confidence to send it outside South China Sea

and 15 years of Type 071 LPD and its never conducted a single over the horizon amphibious landing

I'm not sure if you are being serious a facetious.

The UK may be the Ships however, it's not a local neighborhood rivalry where you beat them up just like that. The Chinese, as far as I can tell, are not desirous of war. They have little to gain with going to war and lot to lose.

These sorts of things, I imagine, have to be managed with great care and sense for proportion. I imagine, the Chinese will make a point in due time but it will likely be in the context of its situation - that is both of where it stand and where it is coming from. As in, about 20 years ago, was the UK able to send its fleet there? Has the Chinese area of influence and assertion increased from 20 years ago?
 
.
Salaam



I'm not sure if you are being serious a facetious.

The UK may be the Ships however, it's not a local neighborhood rivalry where you beat them up just like that. The Chinese, as far as I can tell, are not desirous of war. They have little to gain with going to war and lot to lose.

These sorts of things, I imagine, have to be managed with great care and sense for proportion. I imagine, the Chinese will make a point in due time but it will likely be in the context of its situation - that is both of where it stand and where it is coming from. As in, about 20 years ago, was the UK able to send its fleet there? Has the Chinese area of influence and assertion increased from 20 years ago?

China doesn't want war because it is bad for business, but make no mistake - they will be watched by satellite, recon drone and patrol plane, and at the first sign of aggression, their navy will become a historical term only.

For Australia, their national infrastructure and urban planning dictates that they have weak internal supply lines that are easily cut off in certain situations.
 
.
China is no match for Royal Navy

UK is sending its £3 billion carrier right to Chinas front door

its like me sending my Bugatti to my enemy front door and double dare him to touch it, and he doesnt

humiliation and loss of respect and credibility

make note, UK is sending its top assets into enemy territory, basically parking a carrier in someones back yard not even neutral territory, so you can image what would happen if UK and China met in open ocean in the Pacific

shows the guts and faith UK has in its naval assets, China on the other hand in 10 years of CV-16 being commissioned does not even have the confidence to send it outside South China Sea

and 15 years of Type 071 LPD and its never conducted a single over the horizon amphibious landing
Why do we need to send our navy to the UK? If we need to we just nuke them. Or more likely after the Queen dies Scotland will go independent and the union will disintegrate.
 
.
China is no match for Royal Navy

UK is sending its £3 billion carrier right to Chinas front door

its like me sending my Bugatti to my enemy front door and double dare him to touch it, and he doesnt

humiliation and loss of respect and credibility

make note, UK is sending its top assets into enemy territory, basically parking a carrier in someones back yard not even neutral territory, so you can image what would happen if UK and China met in open ocean in the Pacific

shows the guts and faith UK has in its naval assets, China on the other hand in 10 years of CV-16 being commissioned does not even have the confidence to send it outside South China Sea

and 15 years of Type 071 LPD and its never conducted a single over the horizon amphibious landing



Are the lands falling under UK known to have IQ lowering radiations or something for people who stay there for longer periods?
 
. . . .

Totally fake

Same thing happened with Qing Dynastie who build a 1,000 ship navy with Chinese junks, the junks is a name for Chinese ship not used literally but they lived up to their name

Entire navy was sunk in less than few days and Qing dynasties defeat still hurts Chinese today

Best part is the Royal Navy was a tiny force and they still won without any major loses

Looks like China never learn from history
 
.
Totally fake

Same thing happened with Qing Dynastie who build a 1,000 ship navy with Chinese junks, the junks is a name for Chinese ship not used literally but they lived up to their name

Entire navy was sunk in less than few days and Qing dynasties defeat still hurts Chinese today

Best part is the Royal Navy was a tiny force and they still won without any major loses

Looks like China never learn from history
LOL the Qing Dynasty didn't even have nukes. Tell me how many megatons of nuclear airbursts can London absorb? :rofl:
 
.
In an Anzac Day message to staff, Home Affairs Department Secretary Mike Pezzullo said Australia must work to reduce the risk of
war
"but not at the cost of our precious liberty".
Fact is China never sent one warship to Australia water while Australia sent their ships to SCS. China is the one that is supposed to feel threatened.

Australia is not working to reduce risk of war. On the contary it is creating hot air.
 
.
Totally fake

Same thing happened with Qing Dynastie who build a 1,000 ship navy with Chinese junks, the junks is a name for Chinese ship not used literally but they lived up to their name

Entire navy was sunk in less than few days and Qing dynasties defeat still hurts Chinese today

Best part is the Royal Navy was a tiny force and they still won without any major loses

Looks like China never learn from history

Your every post makes you sound more desperate and gullible.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom